PortfoliosLab logo
HAL vs. RIG
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between HAL and RIG is 0.36, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

HAL vs. RIG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Halliburton Company (HAL) and Transocean Ltd. (RIG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

HAL:

-1.12

RIG:

-0.94

Sortino Ratio

HAL:

-1.61

RIG:

-1.45

Omega Ratio

HAL:

0.79

RIG:

0.83

Calmar Ratio

HAL:

-0.63

RIG:

-0.58

Martin Ratio

HAL:

-1.65

RIG:

-1.52

Ulcer Index

HAL:

25.98%

RIG:

37.57%

Daily Std Dev

HAL:

39.21%

RIG:

60.93%

Max Drawdown

HAL:

-92.99%

RIG:

-99.48%

Current Drawdown

HAL:

-65.71%

RIG:

-97.98%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

HAL:

$18.27B

RIG:

$2.31B

EPS

HAL:

$2.39

RIG:

-$0.98

PEG Ratio

HAL:

11.83

RIG:

-22.91

PS Ratio

HAL:

0.81

RIG:

0.63

PB Ratio

HAL:

1.76

RIG:

0.23

Total Revenue (TTM)

HAL:

$22.56B

RIG:

$3.67B

Gross Profit (TTM)

HAL:

$4.10B

RIG:

$2.50B

EBITDA (TTM)

HAL:

$4.32B

RIG:

$627.00M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HAL achieves a -22.70% return, which is significantly higher than RIG's -30.93% return. Over the past 10 years, HAL has outperformed RIG with an annualized return of -5.86%, while RIG has yielded a comparatively lower -18.39% annualized return.


HAL

YTD

-22.70%

1M

-7.37%

6M

-30.60%

1Y

-43.64%

3Y*

-15.58%

5Y*

13.53%

10Y*

-5.86%

RIG

YTD

-30.93%

1M

13.60%

6M

-39.77%

1Y

-57.05%

3Y*

-12.75%

5Y*

12.15%

10Y*

-18.39%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Halliburton Company

Transocean Ltd.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

HAL vs. RIG — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HAL
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of HAL is 55
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of HAL is 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of HAL is 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of HAL is 55
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of HAL is 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of HAL is 33
Martin Ratio Rank

RIG
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of RIG is 88
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of RIG is 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of RIG is 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of RIG is 88
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of RIG is 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of RIG is 66
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

HAL vs. RIG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Halliburton Company (HAL) and Transocean Ltd. (RIG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current HAL Sharpe Ratio is -1.12, which is comparable to the RIG Sharpe Ratio of -0.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HAL and RIG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

HAL vs. RIG - Dividend Comparison

HAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.26%, while RIG has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
HAL
Halliburton Company
3.26%2.50%1.77%1.22%0.79%1.67%2.94%2.71%1.47%1.33%2.12%1.60%
RIG
Transocean Ltd.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%8.48%15.33%

Drawdowns

HAL vs. RIG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HAL drawdown since its inception was -92.99%, smaller than the maximum RIG drawdown of -99.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HAL and RIG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

HAL vs. RIG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Halliburton Company (HAL) is 11.91%, while Transocean Ltd. (RIG) has a volatility of 19.90%. This indicates that HAL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RIG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

HAL vs. RIG - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Halliburton Company and Transocean Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B6.00B20212022202320242025
5.42B
906.00M
(HAL) Total Revenue
(RIG) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

HAL vs. RIG - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Halliburton Company and Transocean Ltd. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%20212022202320242025
16.2%
31.8%
(HAL) Gross Margin
(RIG) Gross Margin
HAL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Halliburton Company reported a gross profit of 879.00M and revenue of 5.42B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 16.2%.

RIG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Transocean Ltd. reported a gross profit of 288.00M and revenue of 906.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 31.8%.

HAL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Halliburton Company reported an operating income of 431.00M and revenue of 5.42B, resulting in an operating margin of 8.0%.

RIG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Transocean Ltd. reported an operating income of 64.00M and revenue of 906.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 7.1%.

HAL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Halliburton Company reported a net income of 204.00M and revenue of 5.42B, resulting in a net margin of 3.8%.

RIG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Transocean Ltd. reported a net income of -79.00M and revenue of 906.00M, resulting in a net margin of -8.7%.