HAL vs. RIG

In the year-to-date period, HAL achieves a -22.77% return, which is significantly higher than RIG's -37.87% return. Over the past 10 years, HAL has outperformed RIG with an annualized return of -6.53%, while RIG has yielded a comparatively lower -18.17% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Halliburton Company (HAL) and Transocean Ltd. (RIG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current HAL Sharpe Ratio is -1.17, which is comparable to the RIG Sharpe Ratio of -1.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HAL and RIG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

HAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.26%, while RIG has not paid dividends to shareholders.

The maximum HAL drawdown since its inception was -92.99%, smaller than the maximum RIG drawdown of -99.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HAL and RIG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

The current volatility for Halliburton Company (HAL) is 26.51%, while Transocean Ltd. (RIG) has a volatility of 35.83%. This indicates that HAL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RIG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Halliburton Company and Transocean Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.