HACK vs. SEA

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

HACK (Amplify Cybersecurity ETF) and SEA (U.S. Global Sea to Sky Cargo ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HACK is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq ISE Cyber Security Select Index, while SEA is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the U.S. Global Sea to Sky Cargo Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, HACK returned 25.16%/yr vs 18.92%/yr for SEA. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.60% expense ratio.

Performance

HACK vs. SEA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify Cybersecurity ETF (HACK) and U.S. Global Sea to Sky Cargo ETF (SEA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with HACK having a 19.40% return and SEA slightly higher at 19.71%.

HACK

• 1D: 1.24%
• 1M: 1.17%
• YTD: 19.40%
• 6M: 17.34%
• 1Y: 14.12%
• 3Y*: 25.16%
• 5Y*: 9.42%
• 10Y*: 15.64%

SEA

• 1D: -0.59%
• 1M: -2.00%
• YTD: 19.71%
• 6M: 18.58%
• 1Y: 28.19%
• 3Y*: 18.92%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HACK vs. SEA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
HACK Amplify Cybersecurity ETF	19.40%	7.97%	23.49%	37.44%	-21.01%
SEA U.S. Global Sea to Sky Cargo ETF	19.71%	16.78%	2.52%	19.33%	-18.36%

Correlation

The correlation between HACK and SEA is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.22
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.25
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 20, 2022	0.38

The correlation between HACK and SEA shifts across timeframes, from 0.22 (1 year) to 0.38 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

HACK vs. SEA - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	HACK	SEA
Technology	92.7%	-1.6%
Industrials	7.2%	83.8%
Financial Services	0.1%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	0.0%
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	16.2%
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

HACK vs. SEA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HACK

HACK Risk / Return Rank: 17
HACK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 17
HACK Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
HACK Omega Ratio Rank: 17
HACK Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
HACK Martin Ratio Rank: 16

SEA

SEA Risk / Return Rank: 55
SEA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
SEA Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
SEA Omega Ratio Rank: 50
SEA Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
SEA Martin Ratio Rank: 62

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HACK vs. SEA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Cybersecurity ETF (HACK) and U.S. Global Sea to Sky Cargo ETF (SEA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	HACK	SEA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.55	1.71	-1.17
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.90	2.45	-1.55
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.11	1.30	-0.18
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.69	2.66	-1.97
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.61	10.67	-9.06

HACK vs. SEA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HACK Sharpe Ratio is 0.55, which is lower than the SEA Sharpe Ratio of 1.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HACK and SEA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

HACK vs. SEA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HACK drawdown since its inception was -42.68%, which is greater than SEA's maximum drawdown of -39.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HACK and SEA.

Drawdown Indicators

	HACK	SEA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-42.68%	-39.53%	-3.15%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-20.67%	-10.67%	-10.00%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.90%	-32.42%	+10.52%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-38.68%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-38.68%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.93%	-3.94%	-4.99%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.62%	-14.17%	+2.55%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.80%	2.65%	+6.15%

Volatility

HACK vs. SEA - Volatility Comparison

Amplify Cybersecurity ETF (HACK) has a higher volatility of 11.83% compared to U.S. Global Sea to Sky Cargo ETF (SEA) at 5.28%. This indicates that HACK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SEA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HACK	SEA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.83%	5.28%	+6.55%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	21.94%	12.55%	+9.39%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	26.06%	16.54%	+9.52%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.30%	21.64%	+2.66%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.25%	21.64%	+1.61%

HACK vs. SEA - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both HACK and SEA have an expense ratio of 0.60%.

Dividends

HACK vs. SEA - Dividend Comparison

HACK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.06%, less than SEA's 5.64% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
HACK Amplify Cybersecurity ETF	0.06%	0.07%	0.14%	0.20%	0.24%	0.26%	1.11%	0.14%	0.09%	0.01%	1.23%
SEA U.S. Global Sea to Sky Cargo ETF	5.64%	6.76%	18.47%	9.85%	18.73%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HACK and SEA in my portfolio?

HACK and SEA have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, HACK or SEA?

HACK has higher volatility (11.83%) compared to SEA (5.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HACK dropped -42.68% vs SEA's -39.53%.

Which ETF is better, HACK or SEA?

On 3-year performance, HACK leads with 25.16% vs 18.92% for SEA. Both ETFs have the same 0.60% expense ratio. On volatility, SEA has been the lower-risk option at 5.28%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, HACK or SEA?

Over the 3-year period, HACK has performed better with a 25.16% return vs 18.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, HACK or SEA?

HACK and SEA have the same expense ratio: 0.60% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, HACK or SEA?

SEA has the higher dividend yield at 5.64%, compared with 0.06% for HACK.

What is the main difference between HACK and SEA?

HACK is categorized as Technology Equities, while SEA is Industrials Equities. HACK tracks Nasdaq ISE Cyber Security Select Index, while SEA tracks U.S. Global Sea to Sky Cargo Index - Benchmark TR Gross. They also come from different issuers: Amplify and US Global.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SEA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.71 vs 0.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.