HACK vs. MJ

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

HACK (ETFMG Prime Cyber Security ETF) and MJ (ETFMG Alternative Harvest ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HACK is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Prime Cyber Defense Index, while MJ is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Prime Alternative Harvest Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, HACK returned 11.82%/yr vs -35.31%/yr for MJ. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HACK charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for MJ.

Performance

HACK vs. MJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ETFMG Prime Cyber Security ETF (HACK) and ETFMG Alternative Harvest ETF (MJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HACK achieves a 27.17% return, which is significantly higher than MJ's -14.07% return.

HACK

• 1D: -3.00%
• 1M: 24.54%
• YTD: 27.17%
• 6M: 21.31%
• 1Y: 21.52%
• 3Y*: 27.72%
• 5Y*: 11.82%
• 10Y*: 15.84%

MJ

• 1D: -3.25%
• 1M: -5.09%
• YTD: -14.07%
• 6M: 1.76%
• 1Y: 40.95%
• 3Y*: -7.86%
• 5Y*: -35.31%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HACK vs. MJ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
HACK ETFMG Prime Cyber Security ETF	27.17%	7.97%	23.49%	37.44%	-28.16%	7.03%	41.51%	23.39%	5.54%
MJ ETFMG Alternative Harvest ETF	-14.07%	13.07%	-23.97%	-24.18%	-61.55%	-22.79%	-16.18%	-31.36%	-22.57%

Correlation

The correlation between HACK and MJ is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.17
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.25
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.41
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 8, 2018	0.42

Over the past year, the correlation between HACK and MJ has dropped to 0.17 - well below their long-term average of 0.42, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

HACK vs. MJ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	HACK	MJ
Technology	93.0%	0.6%
Industrials	6.9%	-
Financial Services	0.1%	0.3%
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	0.9%
Consumer Defensive	-	18.6%
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	76.5%
Real Estate	-	3.0%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

HACK vs. MJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HACK

HACK Risk / Return Rank: 23
HACK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 24
HACK Sortino Ratio Rank: 23
HACK Omega Ratio Rank: 24
HACK Calmar Ratio Rank: 23
HACK Martin Ratio Rank: 21

MJ

MJ Risk / Return Rank: 21
MJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 16
MJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
MJ Omega Ratio Rank: 25
MJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 19
MJ Martin Ratio Rank: 16

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HACK vs. MJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETFMG Prime Cyber Security ETF (HACK) and ETFMG Alternative Harvest ETF (MJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	HACK	MJ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.85	0.47	+0.37
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.27	1.51	-0.24
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	1.17	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.05	0.85	+0.20
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.52	1.52	+1.00
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

HACK vs. MJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HACK Sharpe Ratio is 0.85, which is higher than the MJ Sharpe Ratio of 0.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HACK and MJ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HACK	MJ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.85	0.47	+0.37
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.49	-0.59	+1.08
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.68	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.57	-0.48	+1.06

Drawdowns

HACK vs. MJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HACK drawdown since its inception was -42.68%, smaller than the maximum MJ drawdown of -96.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HACK and MJ.

Drawdown Indicators

	HACK	MJ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-42.68%	-96.55%	+53.87%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-20.67%	-48.66%	+27.99%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.90%	-69.73%	+47.83%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-38.68%	-93.27%	+54.59%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-38.68%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.00%	-94.45%	+91.45%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.63%	-69.20%	+57.57%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.58%	27.08%	-18.50%

Volatility

HACK vs. MJ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ETFMG Prime Cyber Security ETF (HACK) is 10.68%, while ETFMG Alternative Harvest ETF (MJ) has a volatility of 11.92%. This indicates that HACK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HACK	MJ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.68%	11.92%	-1.24%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	21.52%	59.46%	-37.94%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	25.47%	86.70%	-61.23%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.18%	59.89%	-35.71%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.27%	55.74%	-32.47%

HACK vs. MJ - Expense Ratio Comparison

HACK has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than MJ's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

HACK vs. MJ - Dividend Comparison

HACK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.06%, less than MJ's 2.31% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
HACK ETFMG Prime Cyber Security ETF	0.06%	0.07%	0.14%	0.20%	0.24%	0.26%	1.11%	0.14%	0.09%	0.01%	1.23%
MJ ETFMG Alternative Harvest ETF	2.31%	1.98%	13.80%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HACK and MJ in my portfolio?

HACK and MJ have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, HACK or MJ?

MJ has higher volatility (11.92%) compared to HACK (10.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HACK dropped -42.68% vs MJ's -96.55%.

Which ETF is better, HACK or MJ?

On 5-year performance, HACK leads with 11.82% vs -35.31% for MJ. On fees, HACK is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, HACK has been the lower-risk option at 10.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, HACK or MJ?

Over the 5-year period, HACK has performed better with a 11.82% return vs -35.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, HACK or MJ?

HACK is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for MJ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, HACK or MJ?

MJ has the higher dividend yield at 2.31%, compared with 0.06% for HACK.

What is the main difference between HACK and MJ?

HACK is categorized as Technology Equities, while MJ is Small Cap Blend Equities. HACK tracks Prime Cyber Defense Index, while MJ tracks Prime Alternative Harvest Index. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for HACK and 0.75% for MJ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

HACK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.85 vs 0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.