PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Risk Analysis
Optimization
Factor Model
See All Tools
Portfolio Analysis
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
MJ vs. CNBS
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


MJCNBS
YTD Return32.89%32.79%
1Y Return37.10%45.38%
3Y Return (Ann)-39.53%-40.28%
Sharpe Ratio0.590.75
Daily Std Dev60.83%57.79%
Max Drawdown-92.53%-91.40%
Current Drawdown-87.87%-85.79%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.9

The correlation between MJ and CNBS is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Performance

MJ vs. CNBS - Performance Comparison

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with MJ having a 32.89% return and CNBS slightly lower at 32.79%. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-90.00%-85.00%-80.00%-75.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-82.59%
-76.41%
MJ
CNBS

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


ETFMG Alternative Harvest ETF

Amplify Seymour Cannabis ETF

MJ vs. CNBS - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both MJ and CNBS have an expense ratio of 0.75%.


MJ
ETFMG Alternative Harvest ETF
Expense ratio chart for MJ: current value at 0.75% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.75%
Expense ratio chart for CNBS: current value at 0.75% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.75%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

MJ vs. CNBS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETFMG Alternative Harvest ETF (MJ) and Amplify Seymour Cannabis ETF (CNBS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MJ
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for MJ, currently valued at 0.59, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.005.000.59
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for MJ, currently valued at 1.39, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.001.39
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for MJ, currently valued at 1.16, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.501.16
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for MJ, currently valued at 0.39, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.000.39
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for MJ, currently valued at 1.68, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.001.68
CNBS
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CNBS, currently valued at 0.75, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.005.000.75
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for CNBS, currently valued at 1.54, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.001.54
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for CNBS, currently valued at 1.19, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.501.19
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for CNBS, currently valued at 0.47, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.000.47
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for CNBS, currently valued at 2.37, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.002.37

MJ vs. CNBS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MJ Sharpe Ratio is 0.59, which roughly equals the CNBS Sharpe Ratio of 0.75. The chart below compares the 12-month rolling Sharpe Ratio of MJ and CNBS.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.00-0.500.000.501.00December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
0.59
0.75
MJ
CNBS

Dividends

MJ vs. CNBS - Dividend Comparison

MJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.06%, while CNBS has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016
MJ
ETFMG Alternative Harvest ETF
4.06%3.59%4.12%1.93%4.60%5.26%2.23%2.64%16.22%
CNBS
Amplify Seymour Cannabis ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.58%0.58%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

MJ vs. CNBS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MJ drawdown since its inception was -92.53%, roughly equal to the maximum CNBS drawdown of -91.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MJ and CNBS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-90.00%-88.00%-86.00%-84.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-85.95%
-85.79%
MJ
CNBS

Volatility

MJ vs. CNBS - Volatility Comparison

ETFMG Alternative Harvest ETF (MJ) and Amplify Seymour Cannabis ETF (CNBS) have volatilities of 31.12% and 31.02%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%30.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
31.12%
31.02%
MJ
CNBS