MJ vs. CNBS
Compare and contrast key facts about ETFMG Alternative Harvest ETF (MJ) and Amplify Seymour Cannabis ETF (CNBS).
MJ and CNBS are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. MJ is a passively managed fund by ETFMG that tracks the performance of the Prime Alternative Harvest Index. It was launched on Dec 2, 2015. CNBS is an actively managed fund by Amplify Investments. It was launched on Jul 23, 2019.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: MJ or CNBS.
Performance
MJ vs. CNBS - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MJ achieves a -14.73% return, which is significantly higher than CNBS's -23.28% return.
MJ
-14.73%
-26.38%
-28.00%
-10.52%
-28.81%
N/A
CNBS
-23.28%
-31.26%
-33.28%
-20.68%
-25.67%
N/A
Key characteristics
| MJ | CNBS | |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | -0.17 | -0.33 |
| Sortino Ratio | 0.16 | -0.09 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.02 | 0.99 |
| Calmar Ratio | -0.11 | -0.22 |
| Martin Ratio | -0.48 | -0.84 |
| Ulcer Index | 21.45% | 24.14% |
| Daily Std Dev | 59.04% | 61.38% |
| Max Drawdown | -92.53% | -92.39% |
| Current Drawdown | -92.22% | -91.79% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MJ vs. CNBS - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both MJ and CNBS have an expense ratio of 0.75%.
Correlation
The correlation between MJ and CNBS is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
MJ vs. CNBS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETFMG Alternative Harvest ETF (MJ) and Amplify Seymour Cannabis ETF (CNBS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
MJ vs. CNBS - Dividend Comparison
MJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.46%, while CNBS has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MJ ETFMG Alternative Harvest ETF | 13.46% | 3.59% | 4.13% | 1.93% | 4.60% | 5.26% | 2.23% | 2.64% | 16.22% |
CNBS Amplify Seymour Cannabis ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.58% | 0.58% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
MJ vs. CNBS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MJ drawdown since its inception was -92.53%, roughly equal to the maximum CNBS drawdown of -92.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MJ and CNBS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
MJ vs. CNBS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ETFMG Alternative Harvest ETF (MJ) is 23.43%, while Amplify Seymour Cannabis ETF (CNBS) has a volatility of 29.32%. This indicates that MJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CNBS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.