PortfoliosLab logo
MJ vs. MJUS
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between MJ and MJUS is 0.32, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.3

Performance

MJ vs. MJUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ETFMG Alternative Harvest ETF (MJ) and ETFMG U.S. Alternative Harvest ETF (MJUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-92.00%-90.00%-88.00%-86.00%-84.00%-82.00%-80.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-90.09%
-91.92%
MJ
MJUS

Key characteristics

Returns By Period


MJ

YTD

-24.55%

1M

-0.15%

6M

-49.90%

1Y

-52.57%

5Y*

-30.92%

10Y*

N/A

MJUS

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


MJ vs. MJUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both MJ and MJUS have an expense ratio of 0.75%.


Expense ratio chart for MJ: current value is 0.75%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
MJ: 0.75%
Expense ratio chart for MJUS: current value is 0.75%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
MJUS: 0.75%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

MJ vs. MJUS — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MJ
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MJ is 11
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MJ is 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MJ is 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MJ is 00
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MJ is 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MJ is 33
Martin Ratio Rank

MJUS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MJUS is 11
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MJUS is 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MJUS is 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MJUS is 00
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MJUS is 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MJUS is 00
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

MJ vs. MJUS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETFMG Alternative Harvest ETF (MJ) and ETFMG U.S. Alternative Harvest ETF (MJUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The chart of Sharpe ratio for MJ, currently valued at -0.95, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.00
MJ: -0.96
MJUS: -0.94
The chart of Sortino ratio for MJ, currently valued at -1.56, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.00
MJ: -1.56
MJUS: -1.47
The chart of Omega ratio for MJ, currently valued at 0.81, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.00
MJ: 0.81
MJUS: 0.77
The chart of Calmar ratio for MJ, currently valued at -0.57, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.00
MJ: -0.57
MJUS: -0.65
The chart of Martin ratio for MJ, currently valued at -1.28, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.00
MJ: -1.28
MJUS: -1.19


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.00-0.500.000.50NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-0.96
-0.94
MJ
MJUS

Dividends

MJ vs. MJUS - Dividend Comparison

MJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.03%, while MJUS has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM202420232022202120202019201820172016
MJ
ETFMG Alternative Harvest ETF
15.03%13.84%3.59%4.13%1.93%4.60%5.26%2.23%1.98%1.35%
MJUS
ETFMG U.S. Alternative Harvest ETF
4.03%8.85%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

MJ vs. MJUS - Drawdown Comparison


-94.00%-92.00%-90.00%-88.00%-86.00%-84.00%-82.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-91.37%
-92.38%
MJ
MJUS

Volatility

MJ vs. MJUS - Volatility Comparison

ETFMG Alternative Harvest ETF (MJ) has a higher volatility of 19.26% compared to ETFMG U.S. Alternative Harvest ETF (MJUS) at 0.00%. This indicates that MJ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MJUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
19.26%
0
MJ
MJUS