PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Portfolios
Screeners
Discussions
MJ vs. MJUS
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

MJ vs. MJUS

Last updated May 18, 2025

Compare and contrast key facts about ETFMG Alternative Harvest ETF (MJ) and ETFMG U.S. Alternative Harvest ETF (MJUS).

MJ and MJUS are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. MJ is a passively managed fund by ETFMG that tracks the performance of the Prime Alternative Harvest Index. It was launched on Dec 2, 2015. MJUS is an actively managed fund by ETFMG. It was launched on May 12, 2021.

Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: MJ or MJUS.

Correlation

The correlation between MJ and MJUS is 0.32, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

MJ vs. MJUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ETFMG Alternative Harvest ETF (MJ) and ETFMG U.S. Alternative Harvest ETF (MJUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Returns By Period

MJ

YTD

-23.88%

1M

9.18%

6M

-34.96%

1Y

-57.26%

5Y*

-30.42%

10Y*

N/A

MJUS

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

MJ vs. MJUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both MJ and MJUS have an expense ratio of 0.75%.

MJ
ETFMG Alternative Harvest ETF
MJUS
ETFMG U.S. Alternative Harvest ETF

Risk-Adjusted Performance

MJ vs. MJUS — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
MJ
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MJ is 00
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MJ is 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MJ is 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MJ is 00
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MJ is 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MJ is 11
Martin Ratio Rank
MJUS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MJUS is 11
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MJUS is 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MJUS is 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MJUS is 00
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MJUS is 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MJUS is 00
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

MJ vs. MJUS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETFMG Alternative Harvest ETF (MJ) and ETFMG U.S. Alternative Harvest ETF (MJUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Loading data...

Dividends

MJ vs. MJUS - Dividend Comparison

MJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.89%, while MJUS has not paid dividends to shareholders.

TTM202420232022202120202019201820172016
MJ
ETFMG Alternative Harvest ETF		14.89%13.82%3.59%4.12%1.93%4.60%5.26%2.23%1.98%1.35%
MJUS
ETFMG U.S. Alternative Harvest ETF		4.03%8.85%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

MJ vs. MJUS - Drawdown Comparison

Loading data...

Volatility

MJ vs. MJUS - Volatility Comparison

Loading data...