PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
HACK vs. HDV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

HACK vs. HDV

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

HACK (Amplify Cybersecurity ETF) and HDV (iShares Core High Dividend ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HACK is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq ISE Cyber Security Select Index, while HDV is a Dividend fund tracking the Morningstar Dividend Yield Focus Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, HACK returned 15.64%/yr vs 9.45%/yr for HDV. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HACK charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for HDV.

Performance

HACK vs. HDV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify Cybersecurity ETF (HACK) and iShares Core High Dividend ETF (HDV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HACK achieves a 19.40% return, which is significantly higher than HDV's 14.07% return. Over the past 10 years, HACK has outperformed HDV with an annualized return of 15.64%, while HDV has yielded a comparatively lower 9.45% annualized return.

HACK

1D
1.24%
1M
1.17%
YTD
19.40%
6M
17.34%
1Y
14.12%
3Y*
25.16%
5Y*
9.42%
10Y*
15.64%

HDV

1D
1.33%
1M
-1.35%
YTD
14.07%
6M
14.08%
1Y
21.06%
3Y*
15.48%
5Y*
11.09%
10Y*
9.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HACK vs. HDV - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HACK
Amplify Cybersecurity ETF		19.40%7.97%23.49%37.44%-28.16%7.03%41.51%23.39%6.61%19.68%
HDV
iShares Core High Dividend ETF		14.07%11.90%14.16%1.72%7.05%19.45%-6.48%20.22%-3.01%13.40%

Correlation

The correlation between HACK and HDV is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.12

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 12, 2014

0.39

The correlation between HACK and HDV shifts across timeframes, from -0.11 (1 year) to 0.39 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

HACK vs. HDV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
HACK
HDV

Technology

92.7%
0.2%

Industrials

7.2%
3.5%

Financial Services

0.1%
4.7%

Basic Materials

-

0.8%

Communication Services

-

5.7%

Consumer Cyclical

-

9.2%

Consumer Defensive

-

24.5%

Energy

-

20.2%

Healthcare

-

22.6%

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

8.1%

Technology

HACK
92.7%
HDV
0.2%

Industrials

HACK
7.2%
HDV
3.5%

Financial Services

HACK
0.1%
HDV
4.7%

Basic Materials

HACK

-

HDV
0.8%

Communication Services

HACK

-

HDV
5.7%

Consumer Cyclical

HACK

-

HDV
9.2%

Consumer Defensive

HACK

-

HDV
24.5%

Energy

HACK

-

HDV
20.2%

Healthcare

HACK

-

HDV
22.6%

Real Estate

HACK

-

HDV

-

Utilities

HACK

-

HDV
8.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Amplify Cybersecurity ETF

iShares Core High Dividend ETF

Often compared with HACK:
HACK vs. CIBRHACK vs. BUGHACK vs. WCBRHACK vs. VOOHACK vs. QQQHACK vs. FEATXHACK vs. SPAM
Often compared with HDV:
HDV vs. SCHDHDV vs. VYMHDV vs. SPYDHDV vs. DGROHDV vs. DVYHDV vs. VIGHDV vs. SPY

Return for Risk

HACK vs. HDV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
HACK
HACK Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
HACK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HACK Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
HACK Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
HACK Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
HACK Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
HDV
HDV Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
HDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
HDV Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
HDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
HDV Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HACK vs. HDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Cybersecurity ETF (HACK) and iShares Core High Dividend ETF (HDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

HACKHDVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
0.55
2.13

-1.58

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
0.90
3.13

-2.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.36

-0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.69

4.09

-3.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.61

11.19

-9.58

HACK vs. HDV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HACK Sharpe Ratio is 0.55, which is lower than the HDV Sharpe Ratio of 2.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HACK and HDV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HACK vs. HDV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HACK drawdown since its inception was -42.68%, which is greater than HDV's maximum drawdown of -37.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HACK and HDV.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

HACKHDVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.68%

-37.04%

-5.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.67%

-5.18%

-15.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.90%

-10.49%

-11.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.68%

-15.42%

-23.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.68%

-37.04%

-1.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.93%

-1.35%

-7.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.62%

-3.08%

-8.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.80%

1.89%

+6.91%

Volatility

HACK vs. HDV - Volatility Comparison

Amplify Cybersecurity ETF (HACK) has a higher volatility of 11.83% compared to iShares Core High Dividend ETF (HDV) at 3.64%. This indicates that HACK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

HACKHDVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.83%

3.64%

+8.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.94%

7.61%

+14.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.06%

9.93%

+16.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.30%

12.81%

+11.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.25%

15.73%

+7.52%

HACK vs. HDV - Expense Ratio Comparison

HACK has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than HDV's 0.08% expense ratio.

Dividends

HACK vs. HDV - Dividend Comparison

HACK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.06%, less than HDV's 2.90% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HACK
Amplify Cybersecurity ETF		0.06%0.07%0.14%0.20%0.24%0.26%1.11%0.14%0.09%0.01%1.23%0.00%
HDV
iShares Core High Dividend ETF		2.90%3.22%3.67%3.82%3.56%3.47%4.07%3.27%3.67%3.27%3.28%3.92%

Frequently Asked Questions

HACK and HDV have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HACK has higher volatility (11.83%) compared to HDV (3.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HACK dropped -42.68% vs HDV's -37.04%.

On 10-year performance, HACK leads with 15.64% vs 9.45% for HDV. On fees, HDV is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, HDV has been the lower-risk option at 3.64%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, HACK has performed better with a 15.64% return vs 9.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HDV is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for HACK.

HDV has the higher dividend yield at 2.90%, compared with 0.06% for HACK.

HACK is categorized as Technology Equities, while HDV is Dividend. HACK tracks Nasdaq ISE Cyber Security Select Index, while HDV tracks Morningstar Dividend Yield Focus Index. They also come from different issuers: Amplify and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for HACK and 0.08% for HDV.

HDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs 0.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HACK and HDV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer