PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
HACK vs. BATT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

HACK vs. BATT

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

HACK (Amplify Cybersecurity ETF) and BATT (Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HACK is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq ISE Cyber Security Select Index, while BATT is a Lithium & Battery Metals fund actively managed by Amplify. HACK is passively managed, while BATT is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, HACK returned 9.42%/yr vs 1.08%/yr for BATT. A 0.50 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HACK charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for BATT.

Performance

HACK vs. BATT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify Cybersecurity ETF (HACK) and Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF (BATT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HACK achieves a 19.40% return, which is significantly higher than BATT's 14.35% return.

HACK

1D
1.24%
1M
1.17%
YTD
19.40%
6M
17.34%
1Y
14.12%
3Y*
25.16%
5Y*
9.42%
10Y*
15.64%

BATT

1D
-5.00%
1M
-5.57%
YTD
14.35%
6M
13.17%
1Y
80.97%
3Y*
10.67%
5Y*
1.08%
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HACK vs. BATT - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
HACK
Amplify Cybersecurity ETF		19.40%7.97%23.49%37.44%-28.16%7.03%41.51%23.39%-11.88%
BATT
Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF		14.35%59.70%-13.93%-7.05%-32.25%16.52%44.43%-2.40%-42.27%

Correlation

The correlation between HACK and BATT is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.38

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 6, 2018

0.50

Over the past year, the correlation between HACK and BATT has dropped to 0.26 - well below their long-term average of 0.50, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

HACK vs. BATT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
HACK
BATT

Technology

92.7%
5.1%

Industrials

7.2%
16.8%

Financial Services

0.1%
0.3%

Basic Materials

-

58.7%

Communication Services

-

0.0%

Consumer Cyclical

-

18.0%

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

HACK
92.7%
BATT
5.1%

Industrials

HACK
7.2%
BATT
16.8%

Financial Services

HACK
0.1%
BATT
0.3%

Basic Materials

HACK

-

BATT
58.7%

Communication Services

HACK

-

BATT
0.0%

Consumer Cyclical

HACK

-

BATT
18.0%

Consumer Defensive

HACK

-

BATT

-

Energy

HACK

-

BATT

-

Healthcare

HACK

-

BATT

-

Real Estate

HACK

-

BATT

-

Utilities

HACK

-

BATT

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Amplify Cybersecurity ETF

Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF

Often compared with HACK:
HACK vs. CIBRHACK vs. BUGHACK vs. WCBRHACK vs. VOOHACK vs. QQQHACK vs. FEATXHACK vs. SPAM
Often compared with BATT:
BATT vs. LITBATT vs. LITPBATT vs. IDRVBATT vs. TDVBATT vs. CARSBATT vs. ILITBATT vs. IVW

Return for Risk

HACK vs. BATT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
HACK
HACK Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
HACK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HACK Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
HACK Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
HACK Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
HACK Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
BATT
BATT Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
BATT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BATT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
BATT Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
BATT Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
BATT Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HACK vs. BATT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Cybersecurity ETF (HACK) and Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF (BATT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

HACKBATTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
0.55
2.49

-1.95

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
0.90
2.88

-1.98

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.39

-0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.69

4.78

-4.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.61

15.62

-14.01

HACK vs. BATT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HACK Sharpe Ratio is 0.55, which is lower than the BATT Sharpe Ratio of 2.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HACK and BATT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HACK vs. BATT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HACK drawdown since its inception was -42.68%, smaller than the maximum BATT drawdown of -69.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HACK and BATT.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

HACKBATTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.68%

-69.38%

+26.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.67%

-17.03%

-3.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.90%

-47.65%

+25.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.68%

-61.98%

+23.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.68%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.93%

-12.48%

+3.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.62%

-34.60%

+22.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.80%

5.20%

+3.60%

Volatility

HACK vs. BATT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amplify Cybersecurity ETF (HACK) is 11.83%, while Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF (BATT) has a volatility of 12.72%. This indicates that HACK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BATT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

HACKBATTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.83%

12.72%

-0.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.94%

27.15%

-5.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.06%

32.69%

-6.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.30%

29.95%

-5.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.25%

30.76%

-7.51%

HACK vs. BATT - Expense Ratio Comparison

HACK has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than BATT's 0.59% expense ratio.

Dividends

HACK vs. BATT - Dividend Comparison

HACK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.06%, less than BATT's 1.62% yield.

PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
BATT
Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF		1.62%1.85%3.17%3.23%4.14%2.32%0.21%3.22%0.89%0.00%0.00%
HACK
Amplify Cybersecurity ETF		0.06%0.07%0.14%0.20%0.24%0.26%1.11%0.14%0.09%0.01%1.23%

Frequently Asked Questions

HACK and BATT have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BATT has higher volatility (12.72%) compared to HACK (11.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HACK dropped -42.68% vs BATT's -69.38%.

On 5-year performance, HACK leads with 9.42% vs 1.08% for BATT. On fees, BATT is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, HACK has been the lower-risk option at 11.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, HACK has performed better with a 9.42% return vs 1.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BATT is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for HACK.

BATT has the higher dividend yield at 1.62%, compared with 0.06% for HACK.

HACK is categorized as Technology Equities, while BATT is Lithium & Battery Metals. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for HACK and 0.59% for BATT.

BATT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.49 vs 0.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HACK and BATT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer