BATT vs. CARS
BATT (Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF) is Lithium & Battery Metals fund actively managed by Amplify, while CARS (Cars.com Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 5 years, BATT returned -2.05%/yr vs -0.38%/yr for CARS. Their 0.37 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
BATT vs. CARS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BATT achieves a 3.91% return, which is significantly higher than CARS's -2.87% return.
BATT
- 1D
- -0.62%
- 1M
- -5.22%
- 6M
- -5.47%
- YTD
- 3.91%
- 1Y
- 49.49%
- 3Y*
- 3.98%
- 5Y*
- -2.05%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -1.93%
CARS
- 1D
- -0.25%
- 1M
- 4.68%
- 6M
- 4.31%
- YTD
- -2.87%
- 1Y
- -4.59%
- 3Y*
- -19.45%
- 5Y*
- -0.38%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -7.96%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $677.09K | $717.59K | $1.32M | |
CARS Cars.com Inc. | $7.44M | $7.71M | $8.52M |
BATT vs. CARS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BATT Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF | 3.91% | 59.70% | -13.93% | -7.05% | -32.25% | 16.52% | 44.43% | -2.40% | -42.27% |
CARS Cars.com Inc. | -2.87% | -29.60% | -8.65% | 37.76% | -14.42% | 42.39% | -7.53% | -43.16% | -18.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between BATT and CARS is 0.09, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.09 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.25 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.37 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 6, 2018 | 0.37 |
Over the past year, the correlation between BATT and CARS has dropped to 0.09 - well below their long-term average of 0.37, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BATT vs. CARS — Risk / Return Rank
BATT
CARS
BATT vs. CARS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF (BATT) and Cars.com Inc. (CARS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BATT | CARS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.63 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.85 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.01 | +0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.13 | -0.18 | +2.31 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.06 | -0.36 | +6.43 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BATT vs. CARS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BATT drawdown since its inception was -69.38%, smaller than the maximum CARS drawdown of -88.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BATT and CARS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BATT | CARS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.38% | -88.88% | +19.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.02% | -45.03% | +22.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -45.26% | -64.28% | +19.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -61.98% | -66.77% | +4.79% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -20.47% | -63.50% | +43.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -34.40% | -49.03% | +14.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.08% | 21.93% | -13.85% |
Volatility
BATT vs. CARS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF (BATT) is 10.06%, while Cars.com Inc. (CARS) has a volatility of 14.72%. This indicates that BATT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CARS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BATT | CARS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.06% | 14.72% | -4.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.05% | 37.34% | -9.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.66% | 47.71% | -14.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.00% | 44.75% | -14.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.78% | 56.74% | -25.96% |
Dividends
BATT vs. CARS - Dividend Comparison
BATT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.78%, while CARS has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BATT Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF | 1.78% | 1.85% | 3.17% | 3.23% | 4.14% | 2.32% | 0.21% | 3.22% | 0.89% |
CARS Cars.com Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BATT and CARS have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CARS has higher volatility (14.72%) compared to BATT (10.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BATT dropped -69.38% vs CARS's -88.88%.
BATT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.46 vs -0.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BATT and CARS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer