BATT vs. CARS

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

BATT (Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF) is Lithium & Battery Metals fund actively managed by Amplify, while CARS (Cars.com Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 5 years, BATT returned 2.12%/yr vs -7.70%/yr for CARS. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

BATT vs. CARS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF (BATT) and Cars.com Inc. (CARS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BATT achieves a 20.36% return, which is significantly higher than CARS's -18.93% return.

BATT

• 1D: 0.24%
• 1M: -0.60%
• YTD: 20.36%
• 6M: 19.88%
• 1Y: 93.32%
• 3Y*: 12.58%
• 5Y*: 2.12%
• 10Y*: —

CARS

• 1D: -0.60%
• 1M: 2.49%
• YTD: -18.93%
• 6M: -22.92%
• 1Y: -11.62%
• 3Y*: -18.96%
• 5Y*: -7.70%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BATT vs. CARS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
BATT Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF	20.36%	59.70%	-13.93%	-7.05%	-32.25%	16.52%	44.43%	-2.40%	-42.27%
CARS Cars.com Inc.	-18.93%	-29.60%	-8.65%	37.76%	-14.42%	42.39%	-7.53%	-43.16%	-18.87%

Correlation

The correlation between BATT and CARS is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.14
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.27
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.38
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 6, 2018	0.38

Over the past year, the correlation between BATT and CARS has dropped to 0.14 - well below their long-term average of 0.38, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

BATT vs. CARS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BATT

BATT Risk / Return Rank: 85
BATT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
BATT Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
BATT Omega Ratio Rank: 78
BATT Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
BATT Martin Ratio Rank: 88

CARS

CARS Risk / Return Rank: 32
CARS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 32
CARS Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
CARS Omega Ratio Rank: 30
CARS Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
CARS Martin Ratio Rank: 32

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BATT vs. CARS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF (BATT) and Cars.com Inc. (CARS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BATT	CARS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.91	-0.25	+3.16
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.25	-0.05	+3.30
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.44	0.99	+0.45
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.51	-0.26	+5.77
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	18.21	-0.55	+18.76

BATT vs. CARS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BATT Sharpe Ratio is 2.91, which is higher than the CARS Sharpe Ratio of -0.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BATT and CARS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BATT vs. CARS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BATT drawdown since its inception was -69.38%, smaller than the maximum CARS drawdown of -88.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BATT and CARS.

Drawdown Indicators

	BATT	CARS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-69.38%	-88.88%	+19.50%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.03%	-45.03%	+28.00%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-47.65%	-66.77%	+19.12%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-61.98%	-66.77%	+4.79%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.88%	-69.54%	+61.66%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-34.62%	-48.84%	+14.22%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.14%	21.15%	-16.01%

Volatility

BATT vs. CARS - Volatility Comparison

Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF (BATT) has a higher volatility of 11.78% compared to Cars.com Inc. (CARS) at 10.98%. This indicates that BATT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CARS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BATT	CARS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.78%	10.98%	+0.80%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	26.63%	34.78%	-8.15%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	32.33%	46.30%	-13.97%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	29.90%	44.55%	-14.65%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	30.72%	56.80%	-26.08%

Dividends

BATT vs. CARS - Dividend Comparison

BATT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.54%, while CARS has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
BATT Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF	1.54%	1.85%	3.17%	3.23%	4.14%	2.32%	0.21%	3.22%	0.89%
CARS Cars.com Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BATT and CARS in my portfolio?

BATT and CARS have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BATT or CARS?

BATT has higher volatility (11.78%) compared to CARS (10.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BATT dropped -69.38% vs CARS's -88.88%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BATT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.91 vs -0.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.