PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
BATT vs. LIT
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

BATT vs. LIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF (BATT) and Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF (LIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-20.00%-10.00%0.00%10.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-2.22%
3.54%
BATT
LIT

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BATT achieves a -12.06% return, which is significantly lower than LIT's -9.98% return.


BATT

YTD

-12.06%

1M

0.32%

6M

-0.64%

1Y

-6.80%

5Y (annualized)

0.45%

10Y (annualized)

N/A

LIT

YTD

-9.98%

1M

5.85%

6M

4.57%

1Y

-5.36%

5Y (annualized)

13.77%

10Y (annualized)

8.03%

Key characteristics


BATTLIT
Sharpe Ratio-0.30-0.20
Sortino Ratio-0.27-0.07
Omega Ratio0.970.99
Calmar Ratio-0.13-0.11
Martin Ratio-0.55-0.36
Ulcer Index14.16%18.12%
Daily Std Dev25.71%32.77%
Max Drawdown-69.38%-62.61%
Current Drawdown-50.38%-51.34%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BATT vs. LIT - Expense Ratio Comparison

BATT has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than LIT's 0.75% expense ratio.


LIT
Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
Expense ratio chart for LIT: current value at 0.75% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.75%
Expense ratio chart for BATT: current value at 0.59% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.59%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.9

The correlation between BATT and LIT is 0.87, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

BATT vs. LIT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF (BATT) and Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF (LIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for BATT, currently valued at -0.30, compared to the broader market0.002.004.00-0.30-0.20
The chart of Sortino ratio for BATT, currently valued at -0.27, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.00-0.27-0.07
The chart of Omega ratio for BATT, currently valued at 0.97, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.000.970.99
The chart of Calmar ratio for BATT, currently valued at -0.13, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.00-0.13-0.11
The chart of Martin ratio for BATT, currently valued at -0.55, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00-0.55-0.36
BATT
LIT

The current BATT Sharpe Ratio is -0.30, which is lower than the LIT Sharpe Ratio of -0.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BATT and LIT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.50-1.00-0.500.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-0.30
-0.20
BATT
LIT

Dividends

BATT vs. LIT - Dividend Comparison

BATT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.67%, more than LIT's 1.33% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
BATT
Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF
3.67%3.23%4.14%2.32%0.22%3.22%0.90%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LIT
Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
1.33%1.11%0.99%0.22%0.40%1.85%2.52%3.26%2.15%0.24%1.07%0.32%

Drawdowns

BATT vs. LIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BATT drawdown since its inception was -69.38%, which is greater than LIT's maximum drawdown of -62.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BATT and LIT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-60.00%-55.00%-50.00%-45.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-50.38%
-51.34%
BATT
LIT

Volatility

BATT vs. LIT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF (BATT) is 8.31%, while Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF (LIT) has a volatility of 10.48%. This indicates that BATT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
8.31%
10.48%
BATT
LIT