BATT vs. IVW
Compare and contrast key facts about Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF (BATT) and iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF (IVW).
BATT and IVW are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BATT is an actively managed fund by Amplify Investments. It was launched on Jun 6, 2018. IVW is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P 500/Citigroup Growth Index. It was launched on May 22, 2000.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: BATT or IVW.
Key characteristics
| BATT | IVW | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | -10.35% | 9.10% |
| 1Y Return | -18.89% | 29.56% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -13.12% | 6.53% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | -2.28% | 13.99% |
| Sharpe Ratio | -0.79 | 2.07 |
| Daily Std Dev | 23.80% | 13.93% |
| Max Drawdown | -69.38% | -57.35% |
| Current Drawdown | -49.42% | -3.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between BATT and IVW is 0.61, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
BATT vs. IVW - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, BATT achieves a -10.35% return, which is significantly lower than IVW's 9.10% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BATT vs. IVW - Expense Ratio Comparison
BATT has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than IVW's 0.18% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
BATT vs. IVW - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF (BATT) and iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF (IVW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
BATT vs. IVW - Dividend Comparison
BATT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.60%, more than IVW's 0.81% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BATT Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF | 3.60% | 3.23% | 4.14% | 2.32% | 0.21% | 3.22% | 0.89% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IVW iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF | 0.81% | 1.03% | 0.89% | 0.46% | 0.82% | 1.62% | 1.27% | 1.30% | 1.51% | 1.51% | 1.36% | 1.44% |
Drawdowns
BATT vs. IVW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BATT drawdown since its inception was -69.38%, which is greater than IVW's maximum drawdown of -57.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BATT and IVW. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
BATT vs. IVW - Volatility Comparison
Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF (BATT) has a higher volatility of 7.39% compared to iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF (IVW) at 5.70%. This indicates that BATT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IVW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.