HACK vs. ASMH

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

HACK (Amplify Cybersecurity ETF) and ASMH (ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - HACK tracks the Nasdaq ISE Cyber Security Select Index while ASMH tracks the ASML Holding NV Sponsored ADR. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, HACK returned 31.36% vs 143.52% for ASMH. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HACK charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for ASMH.

Performance

HACK vs. ASMH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify Cybersecurity ETF (HACK) and ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF (ASMH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HACK achieves a 36.99% return, which is significantly lower than ASMH's 71.44% return.

HACK

• 1D: -1.02%
• 1M: 14.80%
• 6M: 37.75%
• YTD: 36.99%
• 1Y: 31.36%
• 3Y*: 29.27%
• 5Y*: 12.92%
• 10Y*: 16.35%

ASMH

• 1D: -2.11%
• 1M: 0.25%
• 6M: 36.58%
• YTD: 71.44%
• 1Y: 143.52%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HACK vs. ASMH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
HACK Amplify Cybersecurity ETF	36.99%	17.45%
ASMH ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF	71.44%	59.22%

Correlation

The correlation between HACK and ASMH is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.23
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 23, 2025	0.24

Return for Risk

HACK vs. ASMH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HACK

HACK Risk / Return Rank: 36
HACK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
HACK Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
HACK Omega Ratio Rank: 38
HACK Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
HACK Martin Ratio Rank: 31

ASMH

ASMH Risk / Return Rank: 95
ASMH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
ASMH Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
ASMH Omega Ratio Rank: 89
ASMH Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
ASMH Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HACK vs. ASMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Cybersecurity ETF (HACK) and ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF (ASMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	HACK	ASMH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.17	3.37	-2.20
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.68	3.73	-2.04
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	1.45	-0.24
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.52	9.79	-8.26
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.59	28.17	-24.58

HACK vs. ASMH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HACK Sharpe Ratio is 1.17, which is lower than the ASMH Sharpe Ratio of 3.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HACK and ASMH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

HACK vs. ASMH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HACK drawdown since its inception was -42.68%, which is greater than ASMH's maximum drawdown of -15.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HACK and ASMH.

Drawdown Indicators

	HACK	ASMH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-42.68%	-15.89%	-26.79%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-20.67%	-14.75%	-5.92%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.90%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-38.68%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-38.68%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.67%	-10.51%	+6.84%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.57%	-4.41%	-7.16%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.76%	5.17%	+3.59%

Volatility

HACK vs. ASMH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amplify Cybersecurity ETF (HACK) is 9.31%, while ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF (ASMH) has a volatility of 18.11%. This indicates that HACK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ASMH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HACK	ASMH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.31%	18.11%	-8.80%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	23.45%	34.14%	-10.69%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	27.02%	43.78%	-16.76%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.60%	41.26%	-16.66%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.33%	41.26%	-17.93%

HACK vs. ASMH - Expense Ratio Comparison

HACK has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than ASMH's 0.19% expense ratio.

Dividends

HACK vs. ASMH - Dividend Comparison

HACK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.05%, less than ASMH's 1.63% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
ASMH ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF	1.63%	0.19%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
HACK Amplify Cybersecurity ETF	0.05%	0.07%	0.14%	0.20%	0.24%	0.26%	1.11%	0.14%	0.09%	0.01%	1.23%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HACK and ASMH in my portfolio?

HACK and ASMH have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, HACK or ASMH?

ASMH has higher volatility (18.11%) compared to HACK (9.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HACK dropped -42.68% vs ASMH's -15.89%.

Which ETF is better, HACK or ASMH?

On 1-year performance, ASMH leads with 143.52% vs 31.36% for HACK. On fees, ASMH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, HACK has been the lower-risk option at 9.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, HACK or ASMH?

Over the 1-year period, ASMH has performed better with a 143.52% return vs 31.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, HACK or ASMH?

ASMH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for HACK.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, HACK or ASMH?

ASMH has the higher dividend yield at 1.63%, compared with 0.05% for HACK.

What is the main difference between HACK and ASMH?

HACK tracks Nasdaq ISE Cyber Security Select Index, while ASMH tracks ASML Holding NV Sponsored ADR. They also come from different issuers: Amplify and Precidian Funds. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for HACK and 0.19% for ASMH.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ASMH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.37 vs 1.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.