HACK vs. ARMH

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about ETFMG Prime Cyber Security ETF (HACK) and Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF (ARMH).

HACK and ARMH are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. HACK is a passively managed fund by ETFMG that tracks the performance of the Prime Cyber Defense Index. It was launched on Nov 11, 2014. ARMH is an actively managed fund by Precidian. It was launched on Mar 13, 2025.

Performance

HACK vs. ARMH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ETFMG Prime Cyber Security ETF (HACK) and Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF (ARMH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

HACK vs. ARMH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
HACK ETFMG Prime Cyber Security ETF	-6.57%	11.23%
ARMH Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF	39.97%	-2.01%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HACK achieves a -6.57% return, which is significantly lower than ARMH's 39.97% return.

HACK

• 1D: 3.66%
• 1M: 2.64%
• YTD: -6.57%
• 6M: -13.43%
• 1Y: 4.66%
• 3Y*: 16.40%
• 5Y*: 6.37%
• 10Y*: 12.57%

ARMH

• 1D: 9.71%
• 1M: 20.77%
• YTD: 39.97%
• 6M: 9.09%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HACK vs. ARMH - Expense Ratio Comparison

HACK has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than ARMH's 0.19% expense ratio.

HACK

ETFMG Prime Cyber Security ETF

ARMH

Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF

Return for Risk

HACK vs. ARMH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HACK

HACK Risk / Return Rank: 17
HACK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 17
HACK Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
HACK Omega Ratio Rank: 18
HACK Calmar Ratio Rank: 16
HACK Martin Ratio Rank: 16

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HACK vs. ARMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETFMG Prime Cyber Security ETF (HACK) and Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF (ARMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	HACK	ARMH	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.18	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.44	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.06	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.18	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	0.49	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HACK	ARMH	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.18	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.27	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.55	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.46	0.80	-0.34

Correlation

The correlation between HACK and ARMH is 0.34, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

HACK vs. ARMH - Dividend Comparison

HACK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.08%, less than ARMH's 2.42% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
HACK ETFMG Prime Cyber Security ETF	0.08%	0.07%	0.14%	0.20%	0.24%	0.26%	1.11%	0.14%	0.09%	0.01%	1.23%
ARMH Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF	2.42%	2.64%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

HACK vs. ARMH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HACK drawdown since its inception was -42.68%, roughly equal to the maximum ARMH drawdown of -42.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HACK and ARMH.

Drawdown Indicators

	HACK	ARMH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-42.68%	-42.04%	-0.64%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-20.67%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-38.68%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-38.68%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-15.73%	-13.75%	-1.98%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.70%	-16.33%	+4.63%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.75%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	HACK	ARMH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.05%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.03%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	26.02%	50.59%	-24.57%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.31%	50.59%	-27.28%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.85%	50.59%	-27.74%