GXTG vs. USL
GXTG (Global X Thematic Growth ETF) and USL (United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP) are both exchange-traded funds - GXTG is a Global Equities fund tracking the Solactive Thematic Growth Index, while USL is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the 12 Month Light Sweet Crude Oil. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GXTG returned -7.87%/yr vs 17.41%/yr for USL. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GXTG charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.88%/yr for USL.
Performance
GXTG vs. USL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GXTG achieves a 25.21% return, which is significantly lower than USL's 63.07% return.
GXTG
- 1D
- -2.35%
- 1M
- 8.75%
- YTD
- 25.21%
- 6M
- 20.12%
- 1Y
- 22.25%
- 3Y*
- 6.51%
- 5Y*
- -7.87%
- 10Y*
- —
USL
- 1D
- 1.55%
- 1M
- -1.61%
- YTD
- 63.07%
- 6M
- 59.66%
- 1Y
- 57.86%
- 3Y*
- 18.42%
- 5Y*
- 17.41%
- 10Y*
- 10.91%
GXTG vs. USL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GXTG Global X Thematic Growth ETF | 25.21% | 3.52% | -3.55% | 10.26% | -48.08% | 3.21% | 61.07% | 4.70% |
USL United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP | 63.07% | -12.37% | 8.30% | -1.11% | 27.10% | 62.48% | -25.23% | 7.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between GXTG and USL is -0.21, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.21 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2019 | 0.13 |
The correlation between GXTG and USL shifts across timeframes, from -0.21 (1 year) to 0.13 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
GXTG vs. USL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GXTG
USL
Technology
-
Basic Materials
-
Utilities
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Technology
GXTG
USL
-
Basic Materials
GXTG
USL
-
Utilities
GXTG
USL
-
Communication Services
GXTG
USL
-
Consumer Cyclical
GXTG
USL
-
Healthcare
GXTG
USL
-
Industrials
GXTG
USL
-
Real Estate
GXTG
USL
-
Financial Services
GXTG
USL
Consumer Defensive
GXTG
-
USL
-
Energy
GXTG
-
USL
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GXTG vs. USL — Risk / Return Rank
GXTG
USL
GXTG vs. USL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Thematic Growth ETF (GXTG) and United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP (USL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GXTG | USL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.34 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.91 | 3.47 | -2.56 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.15 | 7.02 | -4.86 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GXTG | USL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 | 2.04 | -1.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.29 | 0.58 | -0.87 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.34 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.12 | 0.01 | +0.11 |
Drawdowns
GXTG vs. USL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GXTG drawdown since its inception was -67.81%, smaller than the maximum USL drawdown of -89.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GXTG and USL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GXTG | USL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.81% | -89.06% | +21.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.65% | -16.76% | -7.89% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.89% | -23.33% | -8.56% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -61.17% | -33.82% | -27.35% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -66.02% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -50.50% | -38.16% | -12.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -43.09% | -61.46% | +18.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.35% | 8.27% | +2.08% |
Volatility
GXTG vs. USL - Volatility Comparison
Global X Thematic Growth ETF (GXTG) and United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP (USL) have volatilities of 10.21% and 10.53%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GXTG | USL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.21% | 10.53% | -0.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.97% | 23.33% | -4.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.52% | 28.54% | -3.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.63% | 30.08% | -2.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.59% | 32.35% | -2.76% |
GXTG vs. USL - Expense Ratio Comparison
GXTG has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than USL's 0.88% expense ratio.
Dividends
GXTG vs. USL - Dividend Comparison
GXTG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.12%, while USL has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GXTG Global X Thematic Growth ETF | 1.12% | 1.40% | 1.08% | 1.99% | 1.48% | 1.56% | 0.48% | 0.31% |
USL United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GXTG and USL have a correlation of -0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
USL has higher volatility (10.53%) compared to GXTG (10.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GXTG dropped -67.81% vs USL's -89.06%.
On 5-year performance, USL leads with 17.41% vs -7.87% for GXTG. On fees, GXTG is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, GXTG has been the lower-risk option at 10.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, USL has performed better with a 17.41% return vs -7.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GXTG is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.88% for USL.
GXTG has the higher dividend yield at 1.12%, compared with 0.00% for USL.
GXTG is categorized as Global Equities, while USL is Oil & Gas. GXTG tracks Solactive Thematic Growth Index, while USL tracks 12 Month Light Sweet Crude Oil. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Concierge Technologies. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for GXTG and 0.88% for USL.
USL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.04 vs 0.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GXTG and USL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer