PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GXTG vs. USL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GXTG vs. USL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Thematic Growth ETF (GXTG) and United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP (USL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GXTG achieves a 25.21% return, which is significantly lower than USL's 63.07% return.


GXTG

1D
-2.35%
1M
8.75%
YTD
25.21%
6M
20.12%
1Y
22.25%
3Y*
6.51%
5Y*
-7.87%
10Y*

USL

1D
1.55%
1M
-1.61%
YTD
63.07%
6M
59.66%
1Y
57.86%
3Y*
18.42%
5Y*
17.41%
10Y*
10.91%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GXTG vs. USL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
GXTG
Global X Thematic Growth ETF
25.21%3.52%-3.55%10.26%-48.08%3.21%61.07%4.70%
USL
United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP
63.07%-12.37%8.30%-1.11%27.10%62.48%-25.23%7.68%

Correlation

The correlation between GXTG and USL is -0.21, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.01

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2019

0.13

The correlation between GXTG and USL shifts across timeframes, from -0.21 (1 year) to 0.13 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

GXTG vs. USL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GXTG
USL

Technology

22.3%

-

Basic Materials

14.4%

-

Utilities

12.4%

-

Communication Services

11.7%

-

Consumer Cyclical

11.5%

-

Healthcare

10.5%

-

Industrials

8.0%

-

Real Estate

6.9%

-

Financial Services

2.3%
4.5%

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Technology

GXTG
22.3%
USL

-

Basic Materials

GXTG
14.4%
USL

-

Utilities

GXTG
12.4%
USL

-

Communication Services

GXTG
11.7%
USL

-

Consumer Cyclical

GXTG
11.5%
USL

-

Healthcare

GXTG
10.5%
USL

-

Industrials

GXTG
8.0%
USL

-

Real Estate

GXTG
6.9%
USL

-

Financial Services

GXTG
2.3%
USL
4.5%

Consumer Defensive

GXTG

-

USL

-

Energy

GXTG

-

USL

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GXTG vs. USL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GXTG
GXTG Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
GXTG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GXTG Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
GXTG Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
GXTG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
GXTG Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

USL
USL Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
USL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USL Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
USL Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
USL Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
USL Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GXTG vs. USL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Thematic Growth ETF (GXTG) and United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP (USL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GXTGUSLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.34

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.91

3.47

-2.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.15

7.02

-4.86

GXTG vs. USL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GXTG Sharpe Ratio is 0.88, which is lower than the USL Sharpe Ratio of 2.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GXTG and USL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GXTGUSLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

2.04

-1.16

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.29

0.58

-0.87

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.34

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.12

0.01

+0.11

Drawdowns

GXTG vs. USL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GXTG drawdown since its inception was -67.81%, smaller than the maximum USL drawdown of -89.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GXTG and USL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GXTGUSLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.81%

-89.06%

+21.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.65%

-16.76%

-7.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.89%

-23.33%

-8.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-61.17%

-33.82%

-27.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-66.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-50.50%

-38.16%

-12.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-43.09%

-61.46%

+18.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.35%

8.27%

+2.08%

Volatility

GXTG vs. USL - Volatility Comparison

Global X Thematic Growth ETF (GXTG) and United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP (USL) have volatilities of 10.21% and 10.53%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GXTGUSLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.21%

10.53%

-0.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.97%

23.33%

-4.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.52%

28.54%

-3.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.63%

30.08%

-2.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.59%

32.35%

-2.76%

GXTG vs. USL - Expense Ratio Comparison

GXTG has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than USL's 0.88% expense ratio.


Dividends

GXTG vs. USL - Dividend Comparison

GXTG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.12%, while USL has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
GXTG
Global X Thematic Growth ETF
1.12%1.40%1.08%1.99%1.48%1.56%0.48%0.31%
USL
United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GXTG and USL have a correlation of -0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

USL has higher volatility (10.53%) compared to GXTG (10.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GXTG dropped -67.81% vs USL's -89.06%.

On 5-year performance, USL leads with 17.41% vs -7.87% for GXTG. On fees, GXTG is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, GXTG has been the lower-risk option at 10.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, USL has performed better with a 17.41% return vs -7.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GXTG is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.88% for USL.

GXTG has the higher dividend yield at 1.12%, compared with 0.00% for USL.

GXTG is categorized as Global Equities, while USL is Oil & Gas. GXTG tracks Solactive Thematic Growth Index, while USL tracks 12 Month Light Sweet Crude Oil. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Concierge Technologies. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for GXTG and 0.88% for USL.

USL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.04 vs 0.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GXTG and USL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer