GXTG vs. BDVL
GXTG (Global X Thematic Growth ETF) and BDVL (iShares Disciplined Volatility Equity Active ETF) are both Global Equities funds - GXTG tracks the Solactive Thematic Growth Index while BDVL tracks the MSCI ACWI Minimum Volatility Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GXTG charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for BDVL.
Performance
GXTG vs. BDVL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GXTG achieves a 25.21% return, which is significantly higher than BDVL's 4.71% return.
GXTG
- 1D
- -2.35%
- 1M
- 8.75%
- YTD
- 25.21%
- 6M
- 20.12%
- 1Y
- 22.25%
- 3Y*
- 6.51%
- 5Y*
- -7.87%
- 10Y*
- —
BDVL
- 1D
- -0.44%
- 1M
- 0.91%
- YTD
- 4.71%
- 6M
- 5.43%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GXTG vs. BDVL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GXTG Global X Thematic Growth ETF | 25.21% | -11.35% |
BDVL iShares Disciplined Volatility Equity Active ETF | 4.71% | 1.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between GXTG and BDVL is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2025 | 0.64 |
GXTG vs. BDVL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GXTG
BDVL
Technology
Basic Materials
Utilities
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Real Estate
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Technology
GXTG
BDVL
Basic Materials
GXTG
BDVL
Utilities
GXTG
BDVL
Communication Services
GXTG
BDVL
Consumer Cyclical
GXTG
BDVL
Healthcare
GXTG
BDVL
Industrials
GXTG
BDVL
Real Estate
GXTG
BDVL
Financial Services
GXTG
BDVL
Consumer Defensive
GXTG
-
BDVL
Energy
GXTG
-
BDVL
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GXTG vs. BDVL — Risk / Return Rank
GXTG
BDVL
GXTG vs. BDVL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Thematic Growth ETF (GXTG) and iShares Disciplined Volatility Equity Active ETF (BDVL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GXTG | BDVL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.91 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.15 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GXTG | BDVL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.29 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.12 | 1.01 | -0.90 |
Drawdowns
GXTG vs. BDVL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GXTG drawdown since its inception was -67.81%, which is greater than BDVL's maximum drawdown of -7.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GXTG and BDVL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GXTG | BDVL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.81% | -7.71% | -60.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.65% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.89% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -61.17% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -50.50% | -0.95% | -49.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -43.09% | -1.19% | -41.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.35% | — | — |
Volatility
GXTG vs. BDVL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GXTG | BDVL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.21% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.97% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.52% | 9.49% | +16.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.63% | 9.49% | +18.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.59% | 9.49% | +20.10% |
GXTG vs. BDVL - Expense Ratio Comparison
GXTG has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than BDVL's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
GXTG vs. BDVL - Dividend Comparison
GXTG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.12%, less than BDVL's 2.66% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BDVL iShares Disciplined Volatility Equity Active ETF | 2.66% | 2.79% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GXTG Global X Thematic Growth ETF | 1.12% | 1.40% | 1.08% | 1.99% | 1.48% | 1.56% | 0.48% | 0.31% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GXTG and BDVL have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BDVL is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BDVL is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for GXTG.
BDVL has the higher dividend yield at 2.66%, compared with 1.12% for GXTG.
GXTG tracks Solactive Thematic Growth Index, while BDVL tracks MSCI ACWI Minimum Volatility Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for GXTG and 0.40% for BDVL.
Find the right allocation for GXTG and BDVL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer