PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BDVL vs. IVES
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BDVL vs. IVES - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Disciplined Volatility Equity Active ETF (BDVL) and Dan IVES Wedbush AI Revolution ETF (IVES). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BDVL achieves a 4.73% return, which is significantly lower than IVES's 15.94% return.


BDVL

1D
-0.97%
1M
-0.75%
YTD
4.73%
6M
4.36%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

IVES

1D
-2.42%
1M
-1.61%
YTD
15.94%
6M
13.43%
1Y
40.84%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BDVL vs. IVES - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between BDVL and IVES is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2025

0.54

BDVL vs. IVES - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BDVL
IVES

Technology

27.8%
71.8%

Financial Services

14.3%
1.9%

Industrials

14.2%
3.1%

Communication Services

10.0%
10.9%

Healthcare

8.3%

-

Consumer Cyclical

6.9%
11.0%

Consumer Defensive

5.3%

-

Utilities

4.5%
1.3%

Basic Materials

1.9%

-

Energy

1.6%

-

Real Estate

0.9%

-

Technology

BDVL
27.8%
IVES
71.8%

Financial Services

BDVL
14.3%
IVES
1.9%

Industrials

BDVL
14.2%
IVES
3.1%

Communication Services

BDVL
10.0%
IVES
10.9%

Healthcare

BDVL
8.3%
IVES

-

Consumer Cyclical

BDVL
6.9%
IVES
11.0%

Consumer Defensive

BDVL
5.3%
IVES

-

Utilities

BDVL
4.5%
IVES
1.3%

Basic Materials

BDVL
1.9%
IVES

-

Energy

BDVL
1.6%
IVES

-

Real Estate

BDVL
0.9%
IVES

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BDVL vs. IVES — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BDVL

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


IVES
IVES Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
IVES Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IVES Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
IVES Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
IVES Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
IVES Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BDVL vs. IVES - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Disciplined Volatility Equity Active ETF (BDVL) and Dan IVES Wedbush AI Revolution ETF (IVES). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BDVLIVESDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.94

BDVL vs. IVES - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BDVL vs. IVES - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BDVL drawdown since its inception was -7.71%, smaller than the maximum IVES drawdown of -22.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BDVL and IVES.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BDVLIVESDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-7.71%

-22.64%

+14.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-22.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.41%

-12.17%

+10.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.18%

-5.83%

+4.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.28%

Volatility

BDVL vs. IVES - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BDVLIVESDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.71%

27.10%

-17.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.71%

26.66%

-16.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.71%

26.66%

-16.95%

BDVL vs. IVES - Expense Ratio Comparison

BDVL has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than IVES's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

BDVL vs. IVES - Dividend Comparison

BDVL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.56%, more than IVES's 0.36% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


BDVL and IVES have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BDVL is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BDVL is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for IVES.

BDVL has the higher dividend yield at 3.56%, compared with 0.36% for IVES.

BDVL is categorized as Global Equities, while IVES is Technology Equities. BDVL tracks MSCI ACWI Minimum Volatility Index, while IVES tracks Solactive Wedbush Artificial Intelligence Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Wedbush. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for BDVL and 0.75% for IVES.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BDVL and IVES

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer