BDVL vs. PAWZ
BDVL (iShares Disciplined Volatility Equity Active ETF) and PAWZ (ProShares Pet Care ETF) are both Global Equities funds - BDVL tracks the MSCI ACWI Minimum Volatility Index while PAWZ tracks the FactSet Pet Care Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BDVL charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for PAWZ.
Performance
BDVL vs. PAWZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BDVL achieves a 5.94% return, which is significantly higher than PAWZ's -10.13% return.
BDVL
- 1D
- -0.63%
- 1M
- 0.48%
- 6M
- 4.59%
- YTD
- 5.94%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PAWZ
- 1D
- 0.72%
- 1M
- 2.14%
- 6M
- -12.58%
- YTD
- -10.13%
- 1Y
- -13.74%
- 3Y*
- -0.91%
- 5Y*
- -9.16%
- 10Y*
- —
BDVL vs. PAWZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BDVL iShares Disciplined Volatility Equity Active ETF | 5.94% | 2.20% |
PAWZ ProShares Pet Care ETF | -10.13% | -2.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between BDVL and PAWZ is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2025 | 0.55 |
BDVL vs. PAWZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BDVL
PAWZ
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
-
Healthcare
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
-
Energy
-
Basic Materials
Real Estate
-
Technology
BDVL
PAWZ
Financial Services
BDVL
PAWZ
Industrials
BDVL
PAWZ
-
Healthcare
BDVL
PAWZ
Communication Services
BDVL
PAWZ
-
Consumer Cyclical
BDVL
PAWZ
Consumer Defensive
BDVL
PAWZ
Utilities
BDVL
PAWZ
-
Energy
BDVL
PAWZ
-
Basic Materials
BDVL
PAWZ
Real Estate
BDVL
PAWZ
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BDVL vs. PAWZ — Risk / Return Rank
BDVL
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
PAWZ
BDVL vs. PAWZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Disciplined Volatility Equity Active ETF (BDVL) and ProShares Pet Care ETF (PAWZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BDVL | PAWZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 0.88 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.65 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -1.38 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BDVL vs. PAWZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BDVL drawdown since its inception was -7.71%, smaller than the maximum PAWZ drawdown of -50.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BDVL and PAWZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BDVL | PAWZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.71% | -50.07% | +42.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -21.10% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -23.12% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -50.07% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.63% | -40.21% | +39.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.15% | -22.81% | +21.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 9.97% | — |
Volatility
BDVL vs. PAWZ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BDVL | PAWZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.14% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 12.30% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.54% | 16.98% | -7.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.54% | 20.27% | -10.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.54% | 21.62% | -12.08% |
BDVL vs. PAWZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
BDVL has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than PAWZ's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
BDVL vs. PAWZ - Dividend Comparison
BDVL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.51%, more than PAWZ's 0.71% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BDVL iShares Disciplined Volatility Equity Active ETF | 3.51% | 2.79% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PAWZ ProShares Pet Care ETF | 0.71% | 0.81% | 0.63% | 0.44% | 0.54% | 0.18% | 0.14% | 0.35% | 0.07% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BDVL and PAWZ have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BDVL is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BDVL is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for PAWZ.
BDVL has the higher dividend yield at 3.51%, compared with 0.71% for PAWZ.
BDVL tracks MSCI ACWI Minimum Volatility Index, while PAWZ tracks FactSet Pet Care Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for BDVL and 0.50% for PAWZ.
Find the right allocation for BDVL and PAWZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer