PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BDVL vs. VT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BDVL vs. VT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Disciplined Volatility Equity Active ETF (BDVL) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BDVL achieves a 6.70% return, which is significantly lower than VT's 11.15% return.


BDVL

1D
0.14%
1M
0.66%
6M
4.88%
YTD
6.70%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*

VT

1D
0.26%
1M
-0.20%
6M
7.80%
YTD
11.15%
1Y
23.51%
3Y*
18.19%
5Y*
10.58%
10Y*
12.39%
ALL TIME*
8.81%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$4.62M$5.40M$7.08M
$425.08M$369.63M$481.55M

BDVL vs. VT - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between BDVL and VT is 0.85, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2025

0.85

BDVL vs. VT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BDVL
VT

Technology

26.2%
31.2%

Industrials

15.9%
11.7%

Financial Services

13.5%
15.7%

Healthcare

10.5%
8.3%

Consumer Cyclical

9.2%
9.0%

Communication Services

8.8%
7.4%

Consumer Defensive

5.3%
4.5%

Utilities

4.5%
2.5%

Basic Materials

3.0%
3.8%

Energy

2.2%
3.6%

Real Estate

1.1%
2.3%

Technology

BDVL
26.2%
VT
31.2%

Industrials

BDVL
15.9%
VT
11.7%

Financial Services

BDVL
13.5%
VT
15.7%

Healthcare

BDVL
10.5%
VT
8.3%

Consumer Cyclical

BDVL
9.2%
VT
9.0%

Communication Services

BDVL
8.8%
VT
7.4%

Consumer Defensive

BDVL
5.3%
VT
4.5%

Utilities

BDVL
4.5%
VT
2.5%

Basic Materials

BDVL
3.0%
VT
3.8%

Energy

BDVL
2.2%
VT
3.6%

Real Estate

BDVL
1.1%
VT
2.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BDVL vs. VT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BDVL

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


VT
VT Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
VT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
VT Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
VT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
VT Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BDVL vs. VT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Disciplined Volatility Equity Active ETF (BDVL) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BDVLVTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.54

BDVL vs. VT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BDVL vs. VT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BDVL drawdown since its inception was -7.71%, smaller than the maximum VT drawdown of -50.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BDVL and VT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BDVLVTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-7.71%

-50.27%

+42.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.84%

+1.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.13%

-6.97%

+5.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.32%

Volatility

BDVL vs. VT - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BDVLVTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.44%

13.96%

-4.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.44%

16.22%

-6.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.44%

17.18%

-7.74%

BDVL vs. VT - Expense Ratio Comparison

BDVL has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than VT's 0.06% expense ratio.


Dividends

BDVL vs. VT - Dividend Comparison

BDVL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.49%, more than VT's 1.59% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BDVL
iShares Disciplined Volatility Equity Active ETF
3.49%2.79%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VT
Vanguard Total World Stock ETF
1.59%1.82%1.95%2.08%2.20%1.82%1.66%2.32%2.53%2.11%2.39%2.45%

Frequently Asked Questions


BDVL and VT have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VT is cheaper at 0.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VT is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for BDVL.

BDVL has the higher dividend yield at 3.49%, compared with 1.59% for VT.

BDVL tracks MSCI ACWI Minimum Volatility Index, while VT tracks FTSE Global All Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for BDVL and 0.06% for VT.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BDVL and VT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer