PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GXPT vs. ARMH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GXPT vs. ARMH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X PureCap MSCI Information Technology ETF (GXPT) and Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF (ARMH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


GXPT

1D
-1.60%
1M
17.05%
YTD
25.98%
6M
24.94%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ARMH

1D
2.87%
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GXPT vs. ARMH - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between GXPT and ARMH is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026

0.80

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GXPT vs. ARMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X PureCap MSCI Information Technology ETF (GXPT) and Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF (ARMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

GXPT vs. ARMH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GXPTARMHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.23

471,500.14

-471,497.91

Drawdowns

GXPT vs. ARMH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GXPT drawdown since its inception was -18.74%, which is greater than ARMH's maximum drawdown of -1.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GXPT and ARMH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GXPTARMHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.74%

-1.61%

-17.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.60%

0.00%

-1.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.93%

-0.40%

-4.53%

Volatility

GXPT vs. ARMH - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GXPTARMHDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.22%

113.00%

-91.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.22%

113.00%

-91.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.22%

113.00%

-91.78%

GXPT vs. ARMH - Expense Ratio Comparison

GXPT has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than ARMH's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

GXPT vs. ARMH - Dividend Comparison

GXPT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.11%, while ARMH has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


GXPT and ARMH have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GXPT is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GXPT is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for ARMH.

GXPT has the higher dividend yield at 0.11%, compared with 0.00% for ARMH.

They also come from different issuers: Global X and Precidian. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for GXPT and 0.19% for ARMH.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GXPT and ARMH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer