GUMI vs. GSIE
GUMI (Goldman Sachs Ultra Short Municipal Income ETF) and GSIE (Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GUMI is a Municipal Bonds fund actively managed by Goldman Sachs, while GSIE is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity Index. GUMI is actively managed, while GSIE is passively managed. Over the past year, GUMI returned 3.18% vs 19.35% for GSIE. At a 0.02 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GUMI charges 0.16%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for GSIE.
Performance
GUMI vs. GSIE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GUMI achieves a 1.06% return, which is significantly lower than GSIE's 6.51% return.
GUMI
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 0.23%
- YTD
- 1.06%
- 6M
- 1.20%
- 1Y
- 3.18%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GSIE
- 1D
- -0.83%
- 1M
- 2.22%
- YTD
- 6.51%
- 6M
- 9.50%
- 1Y
- 19.35%
- 3Y*
- 16.74%
- 5Y*
- 8.04%
- 10Y*
- 9.08%
GUMI vs. GSIE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
GUMI Goldman Sachs Ultra Short Municipal Income ETF | 1.06% | 3.39% | 1.52% |
GSIE Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity ETF | 6.51% | 32.53% | -0.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between GUMI and GSIE is 0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.00 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2024 | 0.02 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GUMI vs. GSIE — Risk / Return Rank
GUMI
GSIE
GUMI vs. GSIE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Ultra Short Municipal Income ETF (GUMI) and Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity ETF (GSIE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GUMI | GSIE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.54 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.71 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.64 | 1.25 | +0.39 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 8.93 | 1.81 | +7.13 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 37.83 | 6.87 | +30.95 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GUMI | GSIE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.92 | 1.38 | +1.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.50 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.54 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 3.29 | 0.52 | +2.77 |
Drawdowns
GUMI vs. GSIE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GUMI drawdown since its inception was -0.48%, smaller than the maximum GSIE drawdown of -34.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GUMI and GSIE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GUMI | GSIE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.48% | -34.63% | +34.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.36% | -10.76% | +10.40% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -13.07% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -29.97% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.63% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.04% | -2.19% | +2.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.05% | -6.06% | +6.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.08% | 2.82% | -2.74% |
Volatility
GUMI vs. GSIE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Goldman Sachs Ultra Short Municipal Income ETF (GUMI) is 0.25%, while Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity ETF (GSIE) has a volatility of 4.38%. This indicates that GUMI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GSIE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GUMI | GSIE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.25% | 4.38% | -4.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.55% | 11.60% | -11.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.09% | 14.15% | -13.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.99% | 16.04% | -15.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.99% | 16.75% | -15.76% |
GUMI vs. GSIE - Expense Ratio Comparison
GUMI has a 0.16% expense ratio, which is lower than GSIE's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
GUMI vs. GSIE - Dividend Comparison
GUMI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.77%, more than GSIE's 2.52% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSIE Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity ETF | 2.52% | 2.65% | 3.11% | 2.87% | 3.01% | 2.40% | 1.60% | 2.80% | 2.68% | 2.31% | 2.15% | 0.13% |
GUMI Goldman Sachs Ultra Short Municipal Income ETF | 2.77% | 2.95% | 1.37% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GUMI and GSIE have a correlation of 0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GSIE has higher volatility (4.38%) compared to GUMI (0.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GUMI dropped -0.48% vs GSIE's -34.63%.
On 1-year performance, GSIE leads with 19.35% vs 3.18% for GUMI. On fees, GUMI is cheaper at 0.16% per year. On volatility, GUMI has been the lower-risk option at 0.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, GSIE has performed better with a 19.35% return vs 3.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GUMI is cheaper with a 0.16% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for GSIE.
GUMI has the higher dividend yield at 2.77%, compared with 2.52% for GSIE.
GUMI is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while GSIE is Foreign Large Cap Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.16% for GUMI and 0.25% for GSIE.
GUMI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.92 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GUMI and GSIE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer