PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GUMI vs. TAXX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GUMI vs. TAXX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Ultra Short Municipal Income ETF (GUMI) and Bondbloxx IR+M Tax-Aware Short Duration ETF (TAXX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with GUMI having a 1.10% return and TAXX slightly lower at 1.07%.


GUMI

1D
0.02%
1M
0.27%
YTD
1.10%
6M
1.28%
1Y
3.24%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TAXX

1D
-0.03%
1M
0.39%
YTD
1.07%
6M
1.62%
1Y
3.94%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GUMI vs. TAXX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between GUMI and TAXX is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.12

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2024

0.25

The correlation between GUMI and TAXX shifts across timeframes, from 0.12 (1 year) to 0.25 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GUMI vs. TAXX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GUMI
GUMI Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
GUMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GUMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
GUMI Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
GUMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
GUMI Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

TAXX
TAXX Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
TAXX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TAXX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
TAXX Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
TAXX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
TAXX Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GUMI vs. TAXX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Ultra Short Municipal Income ETF (GUMI) and Bondbloxx IR+M Tax-Aware Short Duration ETF (TAXX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GUMITAXXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.98

2.34

+0.64

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.80

3.46

+1.34

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.66

1.60

+0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

9.03

4.53

+4.50

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

38.31

13.79

+24.51

GUMI vs. TAXX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GUMI Sharpe Ratio is 2.98, which is comparable to the TAXX Sharpe Ratio of 2.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GUMI and TAXX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GUMITAXXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.98

2.34

+0.64

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

3.32

2.60

+0.72

Drawdowns

GUMI vs. TAXX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GUMI drawdown since its inception was -0.48%, smaller than the maximum TAXX drawdown of -0.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GUMI and TAXX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GUMITAXXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.48%

-0.91%

+0.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.36%

-0.88%

+0.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.03%

+0.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.05%

-0.17%

+0.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.08%

0.29%

-0.21%

Volatility

GUMI vs. TAXX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Goldman Sachs Ultra Short Municipal Income ETF (GUMI) is 0.24%, while Bondbloxx IR+M Tax-Aware Short Duration ETF (TAXX) has a volatility of 0.34%. This indicates that GUMI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TAXX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GUMITAXXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.24%

0.34%

-0.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.55%

0.84%

-0.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.09%

1.69%

-0.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.99%

1.59%

-0.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.99%

1.59%

-0.60%

GUMI vs. TAXX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GUMI has a 0.16% expense ratio, which is lower than TAXX's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

GUMI vs. TAXX - Dividend Comparison

GUMI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.77%, less than TAXX's 3.50% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


GUMI and TAXX have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TAXX has higher volatility (0.34%) compared to GUMI (0.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GUMI dropped -0.48% vs TAXX's -0.91%.

On 1-year performance, TAXX leads with 3.94% vs 3.24% for GUMI. On fees, GUMI is cheaper at 0.16% per year. On volatility, GUMI has been the lower-risk option at 0.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, TAXX has performed better with a 3.94% return vs 3.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GUMI is cheaper with a 0.16% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for TAXX.

TAXX has the higher dividend yield at 3.50%, compared with 2.77% for GUMI.

They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and BondBloxx. Their fees differ too: 0.16% for GUMI and 0.35% for TAXX.

GUMI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.98 vs 2.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GUMI and TAXX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer