PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GUMI vs. JMST
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

GUMI vs. JMST - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Ultra Short Municipal Income ETF (GUMI) and JPMorgan Ultra-Short Municipal Income ETF (JMST). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

GUMI vs. JMST - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GUMI achieves a 0.72% return, which is significantly higher than JMST's 0.50% return.


GUMI

1D
0.08%
1M
0.17%
YTD
0.72%
6M
1.40%
1Y
3.34%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

JMST

1D
0.02%
1M
-0.07%
YTD
0.50%
6M
1.20%
1Y
3.07%
3Y*
3.25%
5Y*
2.20%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


GUMI vs. JMST - Expense Ratio Comparison

GUMI has a 0.16% expense ratio, which is lower than JMST's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

GUMI vs. JMST — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GUMI
GUMI Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
GUMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GUMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
GUMI Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
GUMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
GUMI Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

JMST
JMST Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
JMST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JMST Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
JMST Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
JMST Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
JMST Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GUMI vs. JMST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Ultra Short Municipal Income ETF (GUMI) and JPMorgan Ultra-Short Municipal Income ETF (JMST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GUMIJMSTDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.92

3.81

-0.89

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.55

5.54

-1.00

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.65

2.23

-0.58

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

6.94

4.43

+2.51

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

29.66

23.50

+6.15

GUMI vs. JMST - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GUMI Sharpe Ratio is 2.92, which is comparable to the JMST Sharpe Ratio of 3.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GUMI and JMST, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GUMIJMSTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.92

3.81

-0.89

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

2.68

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

3.35

1.86

+1.49

Correlation

The correlation between GUMI and JMST is 0.15, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

GUMI vs. JMST - Dividend Comparison

GUMI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.85%, more than JMST's 2.77% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018
GUMI
Goldman Sachs Ultra Short Municipal Income ETF
2.85%2.95%1.37%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
JMST
JPMorgan Ultra-Short Municipal Income ETF
2.77%2.84%3.32%3.09%1.10%0.27%0.87%1.63%0.28%

Drawdowns

GUMI vs. JMST - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GUMI drawdown since its inception was -0.48%, smaller than the maximum JMST drawdown of -2.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GUMI and JMST.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


GUMIJMSTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.48%

-2.41%

+1.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.48%

-0.71%

+0.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-1.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.14%

+0.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.05%

-0.13%

+0.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.11%

0.13%

-0.02%

Volatility

GUMI vs. JMST - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs Ultra Short Municipal Income ETF (GUMI) and JPMorgan Ultra-Short Municipal Income ETF (JMST) have volatilities of 0.18% and 0.18%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


GUMIJMSTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.18%

0.18%

0.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.75%

0.47%

+0.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.15%

0.81%

+0.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.01%

0.82%

+0.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.01%

1.15%

-0.14%