PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GSLC vs. GSIE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GSLC vs. GSIE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (GSLC) and Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity ETF (GSIE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GSLC achieves a 5.86% return, which is significantly lower than GSIE's 6.75% return. Over the past 10 years, GSLC has outperformed GSIE with an annualized return of 14.65%, while GSIE has yielded a comparatively lower 9.81% annualized return.


GSLC

1D
-1.22%
1M
-1.29%
YTD
5.86%
6M
4.87%
1Y
19.37%
3Y*
19.26%
5Y*
11.78%
10Y*
14.65%

GSIE

1D
-1.48%
1M
0.12%
YTD
6.75%
6M
6.28%
1Y
20.05%
3Y*
16.92%
5Y*
8.20%
10Y*
9.81%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GSLC vs. GSIE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GSLC
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF
5.86%16.17%24.21%25.09%-18.71%27.17%19.02%30.74%-4.07%22.49%
GSIE
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity ETF
6.75%32.53%5.23%16.99%-15.86%13.27%7.45%22.83%-13.40%26.22%

Correlation

The correlation between GSLC and GSIE is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.72

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2015

0.77

The correlation between GSLC and GSIE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.

GSLC vs. GSIE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GSLC
GSIE

Technology

37.5%
9.9%

Financial Services

10.8%
26.4%

Consumer Cyclical

10.4%
8.7%

Communication Services

10.0%
4.1%

Healthcare

8.8%
9.3%

Industrials

8.3%
18.9%

Consumer Defensive

5.7%
7.5%

Energy

3.3%
4.6%

Utilities

2.4%
3.3%

Basic Materials

1.4%
6.2%

Real Estate

1.2%
1.2%

Technology

GSLC
37.5%
GSIE
9.9%

Financial Services

GSLC
10.8%
GSIE
26.4%

Consumer Cyclical

GSLC
10.4%
GSIE
8.7%

Communication Services

GSLC
10.0%
GSIE
4.1%

Healthcare

GSLC
8.8%
GSIE
9.3%

Industrials

GSLC
8.3%
GSIE
18.9%

Consumer Defensive

GSLC
5.7%
GSIE
7.5%

Energy

GSLC
3.3%
GSIE
4.6%

Utilities

GSLC
2.4%
GSIE
3.3%

Basic Materials

GSLC
1.4%
GSIE
6.2%

Real Estate

GSLC
1.2%
GSIE
1.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GSLC vs. GSIE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GSLC
GSLC Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
GSLC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSLC Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSLC Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
GSLC Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSLC Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

GSIE
GSIE Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
GSIE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSIE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSIE Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
GSIE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSIE Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GSLC vs. GSIE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (GSLC) and Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity ETF (GSIE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GSLCGSIEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.25

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.05

1.87

+0.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.86

7.06

+1.80

GSLC vs. GSIE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GSLC Sharpe Ratio is 1.59, which is comparable to the GSIE Sharpe Ratio of 1.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSLC and GSIE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GSLC vs. GSIE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSLC drawdown since its inception was -33.69%, roughly equal to the maximum GSIE drawdown of -34.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSLC and GSIE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GSLCGSIEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.69%

-34.63%

+0.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.49%

-10.76%

+1.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.66%

-13.07%

-5.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.90%

-29.97%

+5.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.69%

-34.63%

+0.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.08%

-1.97%

-1.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.38%

-6.03%

+1.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.19%

2.85%

-0.66%

Volatility

GSLC vs. GSIE - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (GSLC) and Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity ETF (GSIE) have volatilities of 4.60% and 4.57%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GSLCGSIEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.60%

4.57%

+0.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.67%

12.17%

-2.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.28%

14.54%

-2.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.71%

16.12%

+0.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.70%

16.54%

+1.16%

GSLC vs. GSIE - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSLC has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than GSIE's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

GSLC vs. GSIE - Dividend Comparison

GSLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.95%, less than GSIE's 2.52% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GSIE
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity ETF
2.52%2.65%3.11%2.87%3.01%2.40%1.60%2.80%2.68%2.31%2.15%0.13%
GSLC
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF
0.95%1.00%1.11%1.38%1.61%1.06%1.35%1.54%1.89%1.69%1.69%0.36%

Frequently Asked Questions


GSLC and GSIE have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GSLC has higher volatility (4.60%) compared to GSIE (4.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSLC dropped -33.69% vs GSIE's -34.63%.

On 10-year performance, GSLC leads with 14.65% vs 9.81% for GSIE. On fees, GSLC is cheaper at 0.09% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, GSLC has performed better with a 14.65% return vs 9.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GSLC is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for GSIE.

GSIE has the higher dividend yield at 2.52%, compared with 0.95% for GSLC.

GSLC is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while GSIE is Foreign Large Cap Equities. GSLC tracks Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity Index, while GSIE tracks Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity Index. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for GSLC and 0.25% for GSIE.

GSLC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.59 vs 1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GSLC and GSIE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer