GSLC vs. VTI
GSLC (Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF) and VTI (Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GSLC is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity Index, while VTI is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Total Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, GSLC returned 14.79%/yr vs 15.31%/yr for VTI. With a 0.98 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. GSLC charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VTI.
Performance
GSLC vs. VTI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GSLC achieves a 7.16% return, which is significantly lower than VTI's 10.35% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with GSLC having a 14.79% annualized return and VTI not far ahead at 15.31%.
GSLC
- 1D
- -0.30%
- 1M
- -0.07%
- YTD
- 7.16%
- 6M
- 6.55%
- 1Y
- 22.11%
- 3Y*
- 19.74%
- 5Y*
- 12.17%
- 10Y*
- 14.79%
VTI
- 1D
- -0.32%
- 1M
- 0.55%
- YTD
- 10.35%
- 6M
- 9.59%
- 1Y
- 27.18%
- 3Y*
- 21.19%
- 5Y*
- 12.36%
- 10Y*
- 15.31%
GSLC vs. VTI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSLC Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF | 7.16% | 16.17% | 24.21% | 25.09% | -18.71% | 27.17% | 19.02% | 30.74% | -4.07% | 22.49% |
VTI Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF | 10.35% | 17.10% | 23.81% | 26.05% | -19.52% | 25.68% | 21.08% | 30.67% | -5.23% | 21.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between GSLC and VTI is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 21, 2015 | 0.98 |
The correlation between GSLC and VTI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.
GSLC vs. VTI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GSLC
VTI
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Technology
GSLC
VTI
Financial Services
GSLC
VTI
Consumer Cyclical
GSLC
VTI
Communication Services
GSLC
VTI
Healthcare
GSLC
VTI
Industrials
GSLC
VTI
Consumer Defensive
GSLC
VTI
Energy
GSLC
VTI
Utilities
GSLC
VTI
Basic Materials
GSLC
VTI
Real Estate
GSLC
VTI
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GSLC vs. VTI — Risk / Return Rank
GSLC
VTI
GSLC vs. VTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (GSLC) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GSLC | VTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.32 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.41 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.38 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.34 | 3.06 | -0.72 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.16 | 13.68 | -3.52 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GSLC vs. VTI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GSLC drawdown since its inception was -33.69%, smaller than the maximum VTI drawdown of -55.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSLC and VTI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GSLC | VTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.69% | -55.45% | +21.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.49% | -8.92% | -0.57% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.66% | -19.30% | +0.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.90% | -25.36% | +0.46% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.69% | -35.00% | +1.31% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.89% | -1.48% | -0.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.38% | -8.01% | +3.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.18% | 1.99% | +0.19% |
Volatility
GSLC vs. VTI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (GSLC) is 4.43%, while Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) has a volatility of 4.74%. This indicates that GSLC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VTI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GSLC | VTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.43% | 4.74% | -0.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.60% | 9.96% | -0.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.23% | 12.76% | -0.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.70% | 17.49% | -0.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.73% | 18.35% | -0.62% |
GSLC vs. VTI - Expense Ratio Comparison
GSLC has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is higher than VTI's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
GSLC vs. VTI - Dividend Comparison
GSLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.94%, less than VTI's 1.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSLC Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF | 0.94% | 1.00% | 1.11% | 1.38% | 1.61% | 1.06% | 1.35% | 1.54% | 1.89% | 1.69% | 1.69% | 0.36% |
VTI Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF | 1.02% | 1.12% | 1.27% | 1.44% | 1.66% | 1.21% | 1.42% | 1.78% | 2.04% | 1.71% | 1.92% | 1.98% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.99, GSLC and VTI move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
VTI has higher volatility (4.74%) compared to GSLC (4.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSLC dropped -33.69% vs VTI's -55.45%.
On 10-year performance, VTI leads with 15.31% vs 14.79% for GSLC. On fees, VTI is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, GSLC has been the lower-risk option at 4.43%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VTI has performed better with a 15.31% return vs 14.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VTI is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for GSLC.
VTI has the higher dividend yield at 1.02%, compared with 0.94% for GSLC.
GSLC is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while VTI is Large Cap Blend Equities. GSLC tracks Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity Index, while VTI tracks CRSP US Total Market Index. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for GSLC and 0.03% for VTI.
VTI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.14 vs 1.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GSLC and VTI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer