PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GSLC vs. VTI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GSLC vs. VTI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (GSLC) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GSLC achieves a 7.16% return, which is significantly lower than VTI's 10.35% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with GSLC having a 14.79% annualized return and VTI not far ahead at 15.31%.


GSLC

1D
-0.30%
1M
-0.07%
YTD
7.16%
6M
6.55%
1Y
22.11%
3Y*
19.74%
5Y*
12.17%
10Y*
14.79%

VTI

1D
-0.32%
1M
0.55%
YTD
10.35%
6M
9.59%
1Y
27.18%
3Y*
21.19%
5Y*
12.36%
10Y*
15.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GSLC vs. VTI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GSLC
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF
7.16%16.17%24.21%25.09%-18.71%27.17%19.02%30.74%-4.07%22.49%
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
10.35%17.10%23.81%26.05%-19.52%25.68%21.08%30.67%-5.23%21.21%

Correlation

The correlation between GSLC and VTI is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.99

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 21, 2015

0.98

The correlation between GSLC and VTI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

GSLC vs. VTI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GSLC
VTI

Technology

37.5%
37.0%

Financial Services

10.8%
11.3%

Consumer Cyclical

10.4%
9.7%

Communication Services

10.0%
9.8%

Healthcare

8.8%
9.0%

Industrials

8.3%
9.4%

Consumer Defensive

5.7%
4.3%

Energy

3.3%
3.3%

Utilities

2.4%
2.1%

Basic Materials

1.4%
1.9%

Real Estate

1.2%
2.3%

Technology

GSLC
37.5%
VTI
37.0%

Financial Services

GSLC
10.8%
VTI
11.3%

Consumer Cyclical

GSLC
10.4%
VTI
9.7%

Communication Services

GSLC
10.0%
VTI
9.8%

Healthcare

GSLC
8.8%
VTI
9.0%

Industrials

GSLC
8.3%
VTI
9.4%

Consumer Defensive

GSLC
5.7%
VTI
4.3%

Energy

GSLC
3.3%
VTI
3.3%

Utilities

GSLC
2.4%
VTI
2.1%

Basic Materials

GSLC
1.4%
VTI
1.9%

Real Estate

GSLC
1.2%
VTI
2.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GSLC vs. VTI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GSLC
GSLC Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
GSLC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSLC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSLC Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
GSLC Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSLC Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

VTI
VTI Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
VTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTI Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
VTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTI Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GSLC vs. VTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (GSLC) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GSLCVTIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.38

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.34

3.06

-0.72

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.16

13.68

-3.52

GSLC vs. VTI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GSLC Sharpe Ratio is 1.82, which is comparable to the VTI Sharpe Ratio of 2.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSLC and VTI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GSLC vs. VTI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSLC drawdown since its inception was -33.69%, smaller than the maximum VTI drawdown of -55.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSLC and VTI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GSLCVTIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.69%

-55.45%

+21.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.49%

-8.92%

-0.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.66%

-19.30%

+0.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.90%

-25.36%

+0.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.69%

-35.00%

+1.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.89%

-1.48%

-0.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.38%

-8.01%

+3.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.18%

1.99%

+0.19%

Volatility

GSLC vs. VTI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (GSLC) is 4.43%, while Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) has a volatility of 4.74%. This indicates that GSLC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VTI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GSLCVTIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.43%

4.74%

-0.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.60%

9.96%

-0.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.23%

12.76%

-0.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.70%

17.49%

-0.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.73%

18.35%

-0.62%

GSLC vs. VTI - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSLC has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is higher than VTI's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

GSLC vs. VTI - Dividend Comparison

GSLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.94%, less than VTI's 1.02% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GSLC
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF
0.94%1.00%1.11%1.38%1.61%1.06%1.35%1.54%1.89%1.69%1.69%0.36%
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
1.02%1.12%1.27%1.44%1.66%1.21%1.42%1.78%2.04%1.71%1.92%1.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, GSLC and VTI move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VTI has higher volatility (4.74%) compared to GSLC (4.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSLC dropped -33.69% vs VTI's -55.45%.

On 10-year performance, VTI leads with 15.31% vs 14.79% for GSLC. On fees, VTI is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, GSLC has been the lower-risk option at 4.43%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VTI has performed better with a 15.31% return vs 14.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VTI is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for GSLC.

VTI has the higher dividend yield at 1.02%, compared with 0.94% for GSLC.

GSLC is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while VTI is Large Cap Blend Equities. GSLC tracks Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity Index, while VTI tracks CRSP US Total Market Index. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for GSLC and 0.03% for VTI.

VTI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.14 vs 1.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GSLC and VTI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer