GSLC vs. GSUS
GSLC (Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF) and GSUS (Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. Equity ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds from Goldman Sachs - GSLC tracks the Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity Index while GSUS tracks the Solactive GBS United States Large & Mid Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GSLC returned 12.17%/yr vs 13.20%/yr for GSUS. With a 0.98 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. GSLC charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for GSUS.
Performance
GSLC vs. GSUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GSLC achieves a 7.16% return, which is significantly lower than GSUS's 9.54% return.
GSLC
- 1D
- -0.30%
- 1M
- -0.07%
- YTD
- 7.16%
- 6M
- 6.55%
- 1Y
- 22.11%
- 3Y*
- 19.74%
- 5Y*
- 12.17%
- 10Y*
- 14.79%
GSUS
- 1D
- -0.32%
- 1M
- 0.22%
- YTD
- 9.54%
- 6M
- 9.09%
- 1Y
- 26.52%
- 3Y*
- 21.69%
- 5Y*
- 13.20%
- 10Y*
- —
GSLC vs. GSUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSLC Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF | 7.16% | 16.17% | 24.21% | 25.09% | -18.71% | 27.17% | 32.38% |
GSUS Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. Equity ETF | 9.54% | 18.11% | 25.25% | 27.74% | -19.82% | 27.13% | 34.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between GSLC and GSUS is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 15, 2020 | 0.98 |
The correlation between GSLC and GSUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.
GSLC vs. GSUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GSLC
GSUS
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Technology
GSLC
GSUS
Financial Services
GSLC
GSUS
Consumer Cyclical
GSLC
GSUS
Communication Services
GSLC
GSUS
Healthcare
GSLC
GSUS
Industrials
GSLC
GSUS
Consumer Defensive
GSLC
GSUS
Energy
GSLC
GSUS
Utilities
GSLC
GSUS
Basic Materials
GSLC
GSUS
Real Estate
GSLC
GSUS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GSLC vs. GSUS — Risk / Return Rank
GSLC
GSUS
GSLC vs. GSUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (GSLC) and Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. Equity ETF (GSUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GSLC | GSUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.36 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.38 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.34 | 2.88 | -0.54 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.16 | 12.68 | -2.52 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GSLC vs. GSUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GSLC drawdown since its inception was -33.69%, which is greater than GSUS's maximum drawdown of -25.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSLC and GSUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GSLC | GSUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.69% | -25.62% | -8.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.49% | -9.24% | -0.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.66% | -19.07% | +0.41% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.90% | -25.62% | +0.72% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.69% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.89% | -1.76% | -0.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.38% | -5.25% | +0.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.18% | 2.10% | +0.08% |
Volatility
GSLC vs. GSUS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (GSLC) is 4.43%, while Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. Equity ETF (GSUS) has a volatility of 4.81%. This indicates that GSLC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GSUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GSLC | GSUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.43% | 4.81% | -0.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.60% | 9.94% | -0.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.23% | 12.64% | -0.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.70% | 17.15% | -0.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.73% | 17.09% | +0.64% |
GSLC vs. GSUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
GSLC has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is higher than GSUS's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
GSLC vs. GSUS - Dividend Comparison
GSLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.94%, less than GSUS's 0.99% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSLC Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF | 0.94% | 1.00% | 1.11% | 1.38% | 1.61% | 1.06% | 1.35% | 1.54% | 1.89% | 1.69% | 1.69% | 0.36% |
GSUS Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. Equity ETF | 0.99% | 1.04% | 1.19% | 1.32% | 1.51% | 1.13% | 0.78% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.98, GSLC and GSUS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
GSUS has higher volatility (4.81%) compared to GSLC (4.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSLC dropped -33.69% vs GSUS's -25.62%.
On 5-year performance, GSUS leads with 13.20% vs 12.17% for GSLC. On fees, GSUS is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, GSLC has been the lower-risk option at 4.43%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, GSUS has performed better with a 13.20% return vs 12.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GSUS is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for GSLC.
GSUS has the higher dividend yield at 0.99%, compared with 0.94% for GSLC.
GSLC tracks Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity Index, while GSUS tracks Solactive GBS United States Large & Mid Cap Index. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for GSLC and 0.07% for GSUS.
GSUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.11 vs 1.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GSLC and GSUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer