GSIG vs. FLTR
GSIG (Goldman Sachs Access Investment Grade Corporate 1-5 Year Bond ETF) and FLTR (VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF) are both Corporate Bonds funds - GSIG tracks the FTSE Goldman Sachs US Investment-Grade Corporate Bond 1-5 Years Index while FLTR tracks the MVIS US Investment Grade Floating Rate Index. Both are passively managed. Their 0.11 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. Both charge a 0.14% expense ratio.
Performance
GSIG vs. FLTR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
GSIG
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
FLTR
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 0.27%
- 6M
- 2.30%
- YTD
- 2.70%
- 1Y
- 5.01%
- 3Y*
- 5.95%
- 5Y*
- 4.63%
- 10Y*
- 3.52%
- ALL TIME*
- 2.56%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $35.76M | $33.35M | $28.52M |
GSIG vs. FLTR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSIG Goldman Sachs Access Investment Grade Corporate 1-5 Year Bond ETF | 0.68% | 6.69% | 4.72% | 6.06% | -5.80% | -0.81% | 1.59% |
FLTR VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF | 2.70% | 5.22% | 7.38% | 7.41% | 0.74% | 0.55% | 1.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between GSIG and FLTR is 0.06, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.08 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2020 | 0.11 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GSIG vs. FLTR — Risk / Return Rank
GSIG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FLTR
GSIG vs. FLTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Access Investment Grade Corporate 1-5 Year Bond ETF (GSIG) and VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF (FLTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GSIG | FLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 2.96 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 16.15 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 95.31 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GSIG vs. FLTR - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GSIG | FLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -17.84% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.31% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -1.93% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -3.06% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -17.84% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | 0.00% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -0.67% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.05% | — |
Volatility
GSIG vs. FLTR - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GSIG | FLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.17% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 0.65% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.80% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 2.13% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 5.00% | — |
GSIG vs. FLTR - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both GSIG and FLTR have an expense ratio of 0.14%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
GSIG vs. FLTR - Dividend Comparison
GSIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.00%, less than FLTR's 4.63% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLTR VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF | 4.21% | 4.97% | 5.93% | 6.07% | 2.29% | 0.63% | 1.49% | 3.05% | 2.67% | 1.69% | 1.16% | 0.71% |
GSIG Goldman Sachs Access Investment Grade Corporate 1-5 Year Bond ETF | 3.60% | 4.61% | 4.59% | 3.51% | 2.21% | 1.04% | 0.45% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GSIG and FLTR have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.14% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GSIG and FLTR have the same expense ratio: 0.14% per year.
FLTR has the higher dividend yield at 4.21%, compared with 3.60% for GSIG.
GSIG tracks FTSE Goldman Sachs US Investment-Grade Corporate Bond 1-5 Years Index, while FLTR tracks MVIS US Investment Grade Floating Rate Index. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and VanEck.
Find the right allocation for GSIG and FLTR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer