GSIG vs. FLTR

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

GSIG (Goldman Sachs Access Investment Grade Corporate 1-5 Year Bond ETF) and FLTR (VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF) are both Corporate Bonds funds - GSIG tracks the FTSE Goldman Sachs US Investment-Grade Corporate Bond 1-5 Years Index while FLTR tracks the MVIS US Investment Grade Floating Rate Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.14% expense ratio.

Performance

GSIG vs. FLTR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Access Investment Grade Corporate 1-5 Year Bond ETF (GSIG) and VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF (FLTR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

GSIG

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FLTR

• 1D: 0.04%
• 1M: 0.50%
• 6M: 2.50%
• YTD: 2.54%
• 1Y: 5.21%
• 3Y*: 6.11%
• 5Y*: 4.60%
• 10Y*: 3.53%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GSIG vs. FLTR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
GSIG Goldman Sachs Access Investment Grade Corporate 1-5 Year Bond ETF	0.68%	6.69%	4.72%	6.06%	-5.80%	-0.81%	1.59%
FLTR VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF	2.54%	5.22%	7.38%	7.41%	0.74%	0.55%	1.31%

Correlation

The correlation between GSIG and FLTR is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.06
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.08
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.12
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2020	0.11

Return for Risk

GSIG vs. FLTR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GSIG

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

FLTR

FLTR Risk / Return Rank: 99
FLTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
FLTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
FLTR Omega Ratio Rank: 99
FLTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
FLTR Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GSIG vs. FLTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Access Investment Grade Corporate 1-5 Year Bond ETF (GSIG) and VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF (FLTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GSIG	FLTR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	6.57	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	12.13	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	3.05	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	16.68	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	97.84	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	GSIG	FLTR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-17.84%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-0.31%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-1.93%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-3.06%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-17.84%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	0.00%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-0.67%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.05%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	GSIG	FLTR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	0.25%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	0.64%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	0.80%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	2.13%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	5.00%	—

GSIG vs. FLTR - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both GSIG and FLTR have an expense ratio of 0.14%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

GSIG vs. FLTR - Dividend Comparison

GSIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.00%, less than FLTR's 4.63% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FLTR VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF	4.63%	4.97%	5.93%	6.07%	2.29%	0.63%	1.49%	3.05%	2.67%	1.69%	1.16%	0.71%
GSIG Goldman Sachs Access Investment Grade Corporate 1-5 Year Bond ETF	4.00%	4.61%	4.59%	3.51%	2.21%	1.04%	0.45%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GSIG and FLTR in my portfolio?

GSIG and FLTR have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, GSIG or FLTR?

Both ETFs have the same 0.14% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, GSIG or FLTR?

GSIG and FLTR have the same expense ratio: 0.14% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GSIG or FLTR?

FLTR has the higher dividend yield at 4.63%, compared with 4.00% for GSIG.

What is the main difference between GSIG and FLTR?

GSIG tracks FTSE Goldman Sachs US Investment-Grade Corporate Bond 1-5 Years Index, while FLTR tracks MVIS US Investment Grade Floating Rate Index. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and VanEck.