GSIG vs. FLTR
GSIG (Goldman Sachs Access Investment Grade Corporate 1-5 Year Bond ETF) and FLTR (VanEck Vectors Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF) are both Corporate Bonds funds - GSIG tracks the FTSE Goldman Sachs US Investment-Grade Corporate Bond 1-5 Years Index while FLTR tracks the MVIS US Investment Grade Floating Rate Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GSIG returned 2.21%/yr vs 4.49%/yr for FLTR. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.14% expense ratio.
Performance
GSIG vs. FLTR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GSIG achieves a 0.67% return, which is significantly lower than FLTR's 1.95% return.
GSIG
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.03%
- YTD
- 0.67%
- 6M
- 1.10%
- 1Y
- 4.55%
- 3Y*
- 5.39%
- 5Y*
- 2.21%
- 10Y*
- —
FLTR
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.54%
- YTD
- 1.95%
- 6M
- 2.44%
- 1Y
- 5.34%
- 3Y*
- 6.12%
- 5Y*
- 4.49%
- 10Y*
- 3.51%
GSIG vs. FLTR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSIG Goldman Sachs Access Investment Grade Corporate 1-5 Year Bond ETF | 0.67% | 6.69% | 4.72% | 6.06% | -5.80% | -0.81% | 1.59% |
FLTR VanEck Vectors Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF | 1.95% | 5.22% | 7.38% | 7.41% | 0.74% | 0.55% | 1.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between GSIG and FLTR is 0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2020 | 0.11 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GSIG vs. FLTR — Risk / Return Rank
GSIG
FLTR
GSIG vs. FLTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Access Investment Grade Corporate 1-5 Year Bond ETF (GSIG) and VanEck Vectors Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF (FLTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GSIG | FLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.48 | 6.84 | -4.36 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.83 | 12.94 | -9.10 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.50 | 3.20 | -1.70 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.08 | 17.53 | -14.44 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.63 | 104.93 | -92.30 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GSIG | FLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.48 | 6.84 | -4.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 | 2.11 | -1.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.70 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.79 | 0.53 | +0.26 |
Drawdowns
GSIG vs. FLTR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GSIG drawdown since its inception was -9.57%, smaller than the maximum FLTR drawdown of -17.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSIG and FLTR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GSIG | FLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.57% | -17.84% | +8.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.46% | -0.31% | -1.15% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -1.46% | -1.93% | +0.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -9.57% | -3.06% | -6.51% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -17.84% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.32% | 0.00% | -0.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.10% | -0.67% | -1.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.36% | 0.05% | +0.31% |
Volatility
GSIG vs. FLTR - Volatility Comparison
Goldman Sachs Access Investment Grade Corporate 1-5 Year Bond ETF (GSIG) has a higher volatility of 0.62% compared to VanEck Vectors Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF (FLTR) at 0.24%. This indicates that GSIG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GSIG | FLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.62% | 0.24% | +0.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.36% | 0.62% | +0.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.84% | 0.79% | +1.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.89% | 2.13% | +0.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.71% | 5.00% | -2.29% |
GSIG vs. FLTR - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both GSIG and FLTR have an expense ratio of 0.14%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
GSIG vs. FLTR - Dividend Comparison
GSIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.34%, less than FLTR's 4.73% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLTR VanEck Vectors Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF | 4.73% | 4.97% | 5.93% | 6.07% | 2.29% | 0.63% | 1.49% | 3.05% | 2.67% | 1.69% | 1.16% | 0.71% |
GSIG Goldman Sachs Access Investment Grade Corporate 1-5 Year Bond ETF | 4.34% | 4.61% | 4.59% | 3.51% | 2.21% | 1.04% | 0.45% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GSIG and FLTR have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GSIG has higher volatility (0.62%) compared to FLTR (0.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSIG dropped -9.57% vs FLTR's -17.84%.
On 5-year performance, FLTR leads with 4.49% vs 2.21% for GSIG. Both ETFs have the same 0.14% expense ratio. On volatility, FLTR has been the lower-risk option at 0.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FLTR has performed better with a 4.49% return vs 2.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GSIG and FLTR have the same expense ratio: 0.14% per year.
FLTR has the higher dividend yield at 4.73%, compared with 4.34% for GSIG.
GSIG tracks FTSE Goldman Sachs US Investment-Grade Corporate Bond 1-5 Years Index, while FLTR tracks MVIS US Investment Grade Floating Rate Index. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and VanEck.
FLTR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.84 vs 2.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GSIG and FLTR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer