GSIG vs. JAAA
Compare and contrast key facts about Goldman Sachs Access Investment Grade Corporate 1-5 Year Bond ETF (GSIG) and Janus Henderson AAA CLO ETF (JAAA).
GSIG and JAAA are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GSIG is a passively managed fund by Goldman Sachs that tracks the performance of the FTSE Goldman Sachs US Investment-Grade Corporate Bond 1-5 Years Index. It was launched on Jul 7, 2020. JAAA is an actively managed fund by Janus Henderson. It was launched on Oct 16, 2020.
Performance
GSIG vs. JAAA - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GSIG vs. JAAA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSIG Goldman Sachs Access Investment Grade Corporate 1-5 Year Bond ETF | 0.08% | 6.69% | 4.72% | 6.06% | -5.80% | -0.81% | 0.80% |
JAAA Janus Henderson AAA CLO ETF | 0.73% | 5.16% | 7.43% | 8.59% | 0.49% | 1.39% | 0.79% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GSIG achieves a 0.08% return, which is significantly lower than JAAA's 0.73% return.
GSIG
- 1D
- 0.24%
- 1M
- -0.90%
- YTD
- 0.08%
- 6M
- 1.32%
- 1Y
- 4.78%
- 3Y*
- 5.18%
- 5Y*
- 2.20%
- 10Y*
- —
JAAA
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- 0.38%
- YTD
- 0.73%
- 6M
- 2.11%
- 1Y
- 5.05%
- 3Y*
- 6.82%
- 5Y*
- 4.57%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GSIG vs. JAAA - Expense Ratio Comparison
GSIG has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than JAAA's 0.21% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
GSIG vs. JAAA — Risk / Return Rank
GSIG
JAAA
GSIG vs. JAAA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Access Investment Grade Corporate 1-5 Year Bond ETF (GSIG) and Janus Henderson AAA CLO ETF (JAAA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GSIG | JAAA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.25 | 2.80 | -0.55 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.34 | 3.60 | -0.26 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.91 | -0.44 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.29 | 3.54 | -0.25 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.82 | 24.70 | -10.89 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GSIG | JAAA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.25 | 2.80 | -0.55 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 | 2.71 | -1.95 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.77 | 2.70 | -1.93 |
Correlation
The correlation between GSIG and JAAA is 0.07, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
GSIG vs. JAAA - Dividend Comparison
GSIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.51%, less than JAAA's 5.62% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSIG Goldman Sachs Access Investment Grade Corporate 1-5 Year Bond ETF | 4.51% | 4.61% | 4.59% | 3.51% | 2.21% | 1.04% | 0.45% |
JAAA Janus Henderson AAA CLO ETF | 5.62% | 5.30% | 6.35% | 6.11% | 2.74% | 1.21% | 0.26% |
Drawdowns
GSIG vs. JAAA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GSIG drawdown since its inception was -9.57%, which is greater than JAAA's maximum drawdown of -2.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSIG and JAAA.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GSIG | JAAA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.57% | -2.64% | -6.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.46% | -1.46% | 0.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -9.57% | -2.64% | -6.93% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.90% | -0.03% | -0.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.15% | -0.26% | -1.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.35% | 0.21% | +0.14% |
Volatility
GSIG vs. JAAA - Volatility Comparison
Goldman Sachs Access Investment Grade Corporate 1-5 Year Bond ETF (GSIG) has a higher volatility of 0.87% compared to Janus Henderson AAA CLO ETF (JAAA) at 0.41%. This indicates that GSIG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JAAA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GSIG | JAAA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.87% | 0.41% | +0.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.20% | 0.68% | +0.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.13% | 1.81% | +0.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.87% | 1.69% | +1.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.73% | 1.67% | +1.06% |