GSIG vs. FCSH

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

GSIG (Goldman Sachs Access Investment Grade Corporate 1-5 Year Bond ETF) and FCSH (Federated Hermes Short Duration Corporate ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GSIG is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the FTSE Goldman Sachs US Investment-Grade Corporate Bond 1-5 Years Index, while FCSH is a Short-Term Bond fund actively managed by Federated. GSIG is passively managed, while FCSH is actively managed. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GSIG charges 0.14%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for FCSH.

Performance

GSIG vs. FCSH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Access Investment Grade Corporate 1-5 Year Bond ETF (GSIG) and Federated Hermes Short Duration Corporate ETF (FCSH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

GSIG

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FCSH

• 1D: -0.25%
• 1M: -0.23%
• 6M: 0.32%
• YTD: 0.38%
• 1Y: 3.26%
• 3Y*: 4.99%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GSIG vs. FCSH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
GSIG Goldman Sachs Access Investment Grade Corporate 1-5 Year Bond ETF	0.68%	6.69%	4.72%	6.06%	-5.80%	0.02%
FCSH Federated Hermes Short Duration Corporate ETF	0.38%	6.42%	4.66%	5.45%	-5.87%	0.08%

Correlation

The correlation between GSIG and FCSH is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.78
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.90
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 17, 2021	0.92

The correlation between GSIG and FCSH shifts across timeframes, from 0.78 (1 year) to 0.92 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

GSIG vs. FCSH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GSIG

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

FCSH

FCSH Risk / Return Rank: 65
FCSH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
FCSH Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
FCSH Omega Ratio Rank: 66
FCSH Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
FCSH Martin Ratio Rank: 60

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GSIG vs. FCSH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Access Investment Grade Corporate 1-5 Year Bond ETF (GSIG) and Federated Hermes Short Duration Corporate ETF (FCSH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GSIG	FCSH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.65	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.51	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.32	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	2.63	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	8.34	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	GSIG	FCSH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-8.47%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-1.24%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-1.32%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-0.76%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-2.17%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.39%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	GSIG	FCSH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	0.61%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	1.62%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.99%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	2.88%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	2.88%	—

GSIG vs. FCSH - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSIG has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than FCSH's 0.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

GSIG vs. FCSH - Dividend Comparison

GSIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.00%, less than FCSH's 4.09% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
FCSH Federated Hermes Short Duration Corporate ETF	4.09%	4.14%	4.44%	2.31%	1.76%	0.04%	0.00%
GSIG Goldman Sachs Access Investment Grade Corporate 1-5 Year Bond ETF	4.00%	4.61%	4.59%	3.51%	2.21%	1.04%	0.45%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GSIG and FCSH in my portfolio?

GSIG and FCSH have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, GSIG or FCSH?

On fees, GSIG is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, GSIG or FCSH?

GSIG is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for FCSH.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GSIG or FCSH?

FCSH has the higher dividend yield at 4.09%, compared with 4.00% for GSIG.

What is the main difference between GSIG and FCSH?

GSIG is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while FCSH is Short-Term Bond. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and Federated. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for GSIG and 0.30% for FCSH.