GSIG vs. IIGD
GSIG (Goldman Sachs Access Investment Grade Corporate 1-5 Year Bond ETF) and IIGD (Invesco Investment Grade Defensive ETF) are both Corporate Bonds funds - GSIG tracks the FTSE Goldman Sachs US Investment-Grade Corporate Bond 1-5 Years Index while IIGD tracks the Invesco Investment Grade Defensive Index. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GSIG charges 0.14%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for IIGD.
Performance
GSIG vs. IIGD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
GSIG
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IIGD
- 1D
- -0.21%
- 1M
- -0.24%
- 6M
- 0.13%
- YTD
- 0.11%
- 1Y
- 3.28%
- 3Y*
- 5.02%
- 5Y*
- 1.57%
- 10Y*
- —
GSIG vs. IIGD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSIG Goldman Sachs Access Investment Grade Corporate 1-5 Year Bond ETF | 0.68% | 6.69% | 4.72% | 6.06% | -5.80% | -0.81% | 1.59% |
IIGD Invesco Investment Grade Defensive ETF | 0.11% | 7.11% | 3.90% | 5.71% | -7.27% | -1.42% | 0.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between GSIG and IIGD is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2020 | 0.91 |
The correlation between GSIG and IIGD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GSIG vs. IIGD — Risk / Return Rank
GSIG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
IIGD
GSIG vs. IIGD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Access Investment Grade Corporate 1-5 Year Bond ETF (GSIG) and Invesco Investment Grade Defensive ETF (IIGD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GSIG | IIGD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.26 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.98 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 6.32 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GSIG vs. IIGD - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GSIG | IIGD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -11.43% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -1.67% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -1.97% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -11.43% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -0.94% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -2.39% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.52% | — |
Volatility
GSIG vs. IIGD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GSIG | IIGD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.83% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 1.83% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.34% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 3.67% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 3.69% | — |
GSIG vs. IIGD - Expense Ratio Comparison
GSIG has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is higher than IIGD's 0.13% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
GSIG vs. IIGD - Dividend Comparison
GSIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.00%, less than IIGD's 4.27% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSIG Goldman Sachs Access Investment Grade Corporate 1-5 Year Bond ETF | 4.00% | 4.61% | 4.59% | 3.51% | 2.21% | 1.04% | 0.45% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IIGD Invesco Investment Grade Defensive ETF | 4.27% | 4.25% | 4.13% | 3.74% | 1.73% | 1.77% | 3.21% | 2.44% | 1.23% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GSIG and IIGD have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IIGD is cheaper at 0.13% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IIGD is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.14% for GSIG.
IIGD has the higher dividend yield at 4.27%, compared with 4.00% for GSIG.
GSIG tracks FTSE Goldman Sachs US Investment-Grade Corporate Bond 1-5 Years Index, while IIGD tracks Invesco Investment Grade Defensive Index. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for GSIG and 0.13% for IIGD.
Find the right allocation for GSIG and IIGD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer