GSEW vs. SPXM

Last updated Jul 16, 2026

GSEW (Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF) and SPXM (Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. GSEW is passively managed, while SPXM is actively managed. Over the past year, GSEW returned 17.49% vs 8.99% for SPXM. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GSEW charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.47%/yr for SPXM.

Performance

GSEW vs. SPXM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (GSEW) and Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF (SPXM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

GSEW

• 1D: -0.28%
• 1M: 0.19%
• 6M: 7.85%
• YTD: 11.74%
• 1Y: 17.49%
• 3Y*: 15.98%
• 5Y*: 8.95%
• 10Y*: —

SPXM

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• 6M: 0.00%
• YTD: 0.00%
• 1Y: 8.99%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GSEW vs. SPXM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
GSEW Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF	11.74%	4.11%
SPXM Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF	0.00%	9.27%

Correlation

The correlation between GSEW and SPXM is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.43
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 8, 2025	0.44

Return for Risk

GSEW vs. SPXM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GSEW

GSEW Risk / Return Rank: 53
GSEW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
GSEW Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
GSEW Omega Ratio Rank: 48
GSEW Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
GSEW Martin Ratio Rank: 61

SPXM

SPXM Risk / Return Rank: 61
SPXM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
SPXM Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
SPXM Omega Ratio Rank: 84
SPXM Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
SPXM Martin Ratio Rank: 70

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GSEW vs. SPXM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (GSEW) and Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF (SPXM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GSEW	SPXM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.43	1.44	-0.01
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.06	2.04	+0.02
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.40	-0.15
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.28	2.18	+0.10
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.63	10.19	-1.56

GSEW vs. SPXM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GSEW Sharpe Ratio is 1.43, which is comparable to the SPXM Sharpe Ratio of 1.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSEW and SPXM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GSEW vs. SPXM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSEW drawdown since its inception was -38.65%, which is greater than SPXM's maximum drawdown of -5.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSEW and SPXM.

Drawdown Indicators

	GSEW	SPXM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-38.65%	-5.08%	-33.57%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.72%	-5.08%	-2.64%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.18%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.74%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.06%	-0.75%	-0.31%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.82%	-0.78%	-5.04%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.03%	—	—

Volatility

GSEW vs. SPXM - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (GSEW) has a higher volatility of 2.57% compared to Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF (SPXM) at 0.00%. This indicates that GSEW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPXM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GSEW	SPXM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.57%	0.00%	+2.57%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.24%	3.78%	+5.46%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.34%	7.66%	+4.68%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.95%	7.61%	+9.34%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.12%	7.61%	+11.51%

GSEW vs. SPXM - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSEW has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than SPXM's 0.47% expense ratio.

Dividends

GSEW vs. SPXM - Dividend Comparison

GSEW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.38%, more than SPXM's 0.24% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GSEW Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF	1.38%	1.52%	1.46%	1.64%	1.74%	1.34%	1.53%	1.66%	1.56%	0.54%
SPXM Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF	0.24%	0.24%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GSEW and SPXM in my portfolio?

GSEW and SPXM have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GSEW or SPXM?

GSEW has higher volatility (2.57%) compared to SPXM (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSEW dropped -38.65% vs SPXM's -5.08%.

Which ETF is better, GSEW or SPXM?

On 1-year performance, GSEW leads with 17.49% vs 8.99% for SPXM. On fees, GSEW is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, SPXM has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, GSEW or SPXM?

Over the 1-year period, GSEW has performed better with a 17.49% return vs 8.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, GSEW or SPXM?

GSEW is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for SPXM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GSEW or SPXM?

GSEW has the higher dividend yield at 1.38%, compared with 0.24% for SPXM.

What is the main difference between GSEW and SPXM?

They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and Azoria. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for GSEW and 0.47% for SPXM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SPXM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.44 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.