PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPXM vs. SPD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPXM vs. SPD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF (SPXM) and Simplify US Equity PLUS Downside Convexity ETF (SPD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


SPXM

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
6M
0.00%
YTD
0.00%
1Y
8.67%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SPD

1D
0.34%
1M
1.62%
6M
5.27%
YTD
7.12%
1Y
11.80%
3Y*
16.79%
5Y*
7.78%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPXM vs. SPD - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between SPXM and SPD is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 8, 2025

0.56

The correlation between SPXM and SPD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPXM vs. SPD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPXM
SPXM Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
SPXM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPXM Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPXM Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
SPXM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPXM Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

SPD
SPD Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
SPD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPD Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPD Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
SPD Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPD Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPXM vs. SPD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF (SPXM) and Simplify US Equity PLUS Downside Convexity ETF (SPD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SPXMSPDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.63

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.15

+0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.01

0.90

+1.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.42

2.87

+6.56

SPXM vs. SPD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPXM Sharpe Ratio is 1.33, which is higher than the SPD Sharpe Ratio of 0.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPXM and SPD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SPXM vs. SPD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPXM drawdown since its inception was -5.08%, smaller than the maximum SPD drawdown of -27.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPXM and SPD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPXMSPDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.08%

-27.38%

+22.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.08%

-11.90%

+6.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.75%

-0.30%

-0.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.78%

-7.62%

+6.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.75%

Volatility

SPXM vs. SPD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF (SPXM) is 0.00%, while Simplify US Equity PLUS Downside Convexity ETF (SPD) has a volatility of 4.21%. This indicates that SPXM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPXMSPDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.00%

4.21%

-4.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.13%

9.36%

-5.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.68%

13.02%

-5.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.66%

16.14%

-8.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.66%

15.97%

-8.31%

SPXM vs. SPD - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPXM has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is lower than SPD's 0.53% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPXM vs. SPD - Dividend Comparison

SPXM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.24%, less than SPD's 0.96% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
SPD
Simplify US Equity PLUS Downside Convexity ETF
0.96%0.97%1.14%1.91%1.64%0.88%0.43%
SPXM
Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF
0.24%0.24%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPXM and SPD have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPD has higher volatility (4.21%) compared to SPXM (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPXM dropped -5.08% vs SPD's -27.38%.

On 1-year performance, SPD leads with 11.80% vs 8.67% for SPXM. On fees, SPXM is cheaper at 0.47% per year. On volatility, SPXM has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SPD has performed better with a 11.80% return vs 8.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPXM is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.53% for SPD.

SPD has the higher dividend yield at 0.96%, compared with 0.24% for SPXM.

They also come from different issuers: Azoria and Simplify. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for SPXM and 0.53% for SPD.

SPXM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.33 vs 0.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPXM and SPD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer