SPXM vs. SPTM
SPXM (Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF) and SPTM (SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. SPXM is actively managed, while SPTM is passively managed. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SPXM charges 0.47%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SPTM.
Performance
SPXM vs. SPTM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
SPXM
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 0.00%
- 6M
- 0.32%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPTM
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- 5.19%
- YTD
- 11.85%
- 6M
- 12.28%
- 1Y
- 29.60%
- 3Y*
- 22.18%
- 5Y*
- 13.73%
- 10Y*
- 15.29%
SPXM vs. SPTM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SPXM Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF | 0.00% | 9.16% |
SPTM SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF | 11.85% | 10.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPXM and SPTM is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2025 | 0.58 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPXM vs. SPTM — Risk / Return Rank
SPXM
SPTM
SPXM vs. SPTM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF (SPXM) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF (SPTM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SPXM | SPTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.51 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.82 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.85 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.57 | 0.46 | +1.11 |
Drawdowns
SPXM vs. SPTM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPXM drawdown since its inception was -5.08%, smaller than the maximum SPTM drawdown of -54.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPXM and SPTM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPXM | SPTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.08% | -54.80% | +49.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.68% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -18.87% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -24.14% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.66% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.75% | 0.00% | -0.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.79% | -9.05% | +8.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.86% | — |
Volatility
SPXM vs. SPTM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPXM | SPTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.79% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 8.90% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.21% | 11.86% | -3.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.21% | 16.86% | -8.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.21% | 18.04% | -9.83% |
SPXM vs. SPTM - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPXM has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is higher than SPTM's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
SPXM vs. SPTM - Dividend Comparison
SPXM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.24%, less than SPTM's 1.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPTM SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF | 1.03% | 1.13% | 1.28% | 1.44% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.56% | 1.72% | 1.90% | 1.66% | 1.91% | 1.92% |
SPXM Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF | 0.24% | 0.24% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPXM and SPTM have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SPTM is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPTM is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for SPXM.
SPTM has the higher dividend yield at 1.03%, compared with 0.24% for SPXM.
They also come from different issuers: Azoria and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for SPXM and 0.03% for SPTM.
Find the right allocation for SPXM and SPTM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer