SPXM vs. XOEX
SPXM (Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF) and XOEX (Xtrackers S&P 100 Ex Top 20 ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. SPXM is actively managed, while XOEX is passively managed. Over the past year, SPXM returned 8.67% vs 24.01% for XOEX. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SPXM charges 0.47%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for XOEX.
Performance
SPXM vs. XOEX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
SPXM
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- 6M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 0.00%
- 1Y
- 8.67%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XOEX
- 1D
- 0.29%
- 1M
- 1.03%
- 6M
- 8.94%
- YTD
- 11.33%
- 1Y
- 24.01%
- 3Y*
- 17.21%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPXM vs. XOEX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SPXM Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF | 0.00% | 9.27% |
XOEX Xtrackers S&P 100 Ex Top 20 ETF | 11.33% | 11.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPXM and XOEX is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 8, 2025 | 0.46 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPXM vs. XOEX — Risk / Return Rank
SPXM
XOEX
SPXM vs. XOEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF (SPXM) and Xtrackers S&P 100 Ex Top 20 ETF (XOEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SPXM | XOEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.76 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.37 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.01 | 3.22 | -1.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.42 | 12.68 | -3.26 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SPXM vs. XOEX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPXM drawdown since its inception was -5.08%, smaller than the maximum XOEX drawdown of -14.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPXM and XOEX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPXM | XOEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.08% | -14.68% | +9.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.08% | -7.31% | +2.23% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -14.68% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.75% | -0.75% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.78% | -2.59% | +1.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.86% | — |
Volatility
SPXM vs. XOEX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF (SPXM) is 0.00%, while Xtrackers S&P 100 Ex Top 20 ETF (XOEX) has a volatility of 3.38%. This indicates that SPXM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XOEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPXM | XOEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.00% | 3.38% | -3.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.13% | 8.85% | -4.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.68% | 11.29% | -3.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.66% | 13.40% | -5.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.66% | 13.40% | -5.74% |
SPXM vs. XOEX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPXM has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is higher than XOEX's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
SPXM vs. XOEX - Dividend Comparison
SPXM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.24%, less than XOEX's 1.45% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPXM Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF | 0.24% | 0.24% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XOEX Xtrackers S&P 100 Ex Top 20 ETF | 1.45% | 1.95% | 2.09% | 1.72% | 0.42% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPXM and XOEX have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XOEX has higher volatility (3.38%) compared to SPXM (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPXM dropped -5.08% vs XOEX's -14.68%.
On 1-year performance, XOEX leads with 24.01% vs 8.67% for SPXM. On fees, XOEX is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, SPXM has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, XOEX has performed better with a 24.01% return vs 8.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XOEX is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for SPXM.
XOEX has the higher dividend yield at 1.45%, compared with 0.24% for SPXM.
They also come from different issuers: Azoria and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for SPXM and 0.15% for XOEX.
XOEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 1.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPXM and XOEX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer