PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GSEW vs. SPTM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GSEW vs. SPTM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (GSEW) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF (SPTM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with GSEW having a 11.74% return and SPTM slightly lower at 11.65%.


GSEW

1D
-0.28%
1M
0.19%
6M
7.85%
YTD
11.74%
1Y
17.49%
3Y*
15.98%
5Y*
8.95%
10Y*

SPTM

1D
0.34%
1M
0.25%
6M
9.95%
YTD
11.65%
1Y
22.88%
3Y*
19.92%
5Y*
13.07%
10Y*
14.97%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GSEW vs. SPTM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GSEW
Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF
11.74%11.97%16.89%17.80%-17.54%25.43%16.28%31.04%-8.11%7.72%
SPTM
SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF
11.65%16.93%23.87%25.55%-17.75%28.58%17.94%31.34%-5.30%7.83%

Correlation

The correlation between GSEW and SPTM is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 14, 2017

0.92

The correlation between GSEW and SPTM shifts across timeframes, from 0.80 (1 year) to 0.92 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

GSEW vs. SPTM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GSEW
SPTM

Technology

21.5%
37.4%

Industrials

15.5%
8.9%

Financial Services

14.1%
11.4%

Healthcare

11.3%
8.4%

Consumer Cyclical

9.4%
10.1%

Utilities

5.6%
2.1%

Consumer Defensive

5.5%
4.4%

Energy

4.6%
3.3%

Basic Materials

4.4%
1.9%

Real Estate

4.2%
2.2%

Communication Services

4.0%
10.0%

Technology

GSEW
21.5%
SPTM
37.4%

Industrials

GSEW
15.5%
SPTM
8.9%

Financial Services

GSEW
14.1%
SPTM
11.4%

Healthcare

GSEW
11.3%
SPTM
8.4%

Consumer Cyclical

GSEW
9.4%
SPTM
10.1%

Utilities

GSEW
5.6%
SPTM
2.1%

Consumer Defensive

GSEW
5.5%
SPTM
4.4%

Energy

GSEW
4.6%
SPTM
3.3%

Basic Materials

GSEW
4.4%
SPTM
1.9%

Real Estate

GSEW
4.2%
SPTM
2.2%

Communication Services

GSEW
4.0%
SPTM
10.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GSEW vs. SPTM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GSEW
GSEW Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
GSEW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSEW Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSEW Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
GSEW Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSEW Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

SPTM
SPTM Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
SPTM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPTM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPTM Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
SPTM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPTM Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GSEW vs. SPTM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (GSEW) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF (SPTM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GSEWSPTMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.33

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.28

2.65

-0.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.63

11.71

-3.07

GSEW vs. SPTM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GSEW Sharpe Ratio is 1.43, which is comparable to the SPTM Sharpe Ratio of 1.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSEW and SPTM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GSEW vs. SPTM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSEW drawdown since its inception was -38.65%, smaller than the maximum SPTM drawdown of -54.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSEW and SPTM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GSEWSPTMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.65%

-54.80%

+16.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.72%

-8.68%

+0.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.18%

-18.87%

+0.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.74%

-24.14%

-1.60%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.06%

-0.18%

-0.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.82%

-9.02%

+3.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.03%

1.96%

+0.07%

Volatility

GSEW vs. SPTM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (GSEW) is 2.57%, while SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF (SPTM) has a volatility of 3.59%. This indicates that GSEW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPTM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GSEWSPTMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.57%

3.59%

-1.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.24%

9.89%

-0.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.34%

12.51%

-0.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.95%

16.97%

-0.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.12%

18.02%

+1.10%

GSEW vs. SPTM - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSEW has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is higher than SPTM's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

GSEW vs. SPTM - Dividend Comparison

GSEW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.38%, more than SPTM's 1.05% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GSEW
Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF
1.38%1.52%1.46%1.64%1.74%1.34%1.53%1.66%1.56%0.54%0.00%0.00%
SPTM
SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF
1.05%1.13%1.28%1.44%1.69%1.25%1.56%1.72%1.90%1.66%1.91%1.92%

Frequently Asked Questions


GSEW and SPTM have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPTM has higher volatility (3.59%) compared to GSEW (2.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSEW dropped -38.65% vs SPTM's -54.80%.

On 5-year performance, SPTM leads with 13.07% vs 8.95% for GSEW. On fees, SPTM is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, GSEW has been the lower-risk option at 2.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, SPTM has performed better with a 13.07% return vs 8.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPTM is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for GSEW.

GSEW has the higher dividend yield at 1.38%, compared with 1.05% for SPTM.

GSEW tracks Solactive US Large Cap Equal Weight Index, while SPTM tracks S&P Composite 1500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for GSEW and 0.03% for SPTM.

SPTM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GSEW and SPTM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer