GSEW vs. SPTM
GSEW (Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF) and SPTM (SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - GSEW tracks the Solactive US Large Cap Equal Weight Index while SPTM tracks the S&P Composite 1500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GSEW returned 8.95%/yr vs 13.07%/yr for SPTM. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GSEW charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SPTM.
Performance
GSEW vs. SPTM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with GSEW having a 11.74% return and SPTM slightly lower at 11.65%.
GSEW
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- 0.19%
- 6M
- 7.85%
- YTD
- 11.74%
- 1Y
- 17.49%
- 3Y*
- 15.98%
- 5Y*
- 8.95%
- 10Y*
- —
SPTM
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- 0.25%
- 6M
- 9.95%
- YTD
- 11.65%
- 1Y
- 22.88%
- 3Y*
- 19.92%
- 5Y*
- 13.07%
- 10Y*
- 14.97%
GSEW vs. SPTM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSEW Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF | 11.74% | 11.97% | 16.89% | 17.80% | -17.54% | 25.43% | 16.28% | 31.04% | -8.11% | 7.72% |
SPTM SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF | 11.65% | 16.93% | 23.87% | 25.55% | -17.75% | 28.58% | 17.94% | 31.34% | -5.30% | 7.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between GSEW and SPTM is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 14, 2017 | 0.92 |
The correlation between GSEW and SPTM shifts across timeframes, from 0.80 (1 year) to 0.92 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
GSEW vs. SPTM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GSEW
SPTM
Technology
Industrials
Financial Services
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Communication Services
Technology
GSEW
SPTM
Industrials
GSEW
SPTM
Financial Services
GSEW
SPTM
Healthcare
GSEW
SPTM
Consumer Cyclical
GSEW
SPTM
Utilities
GSEW
SPTM
Consumer Defensive
GSEW
SPTM
Energy
GSEW
SPTM
Basic Materials
GSEW
SPTM
Real Estate
GSEW
SPTM
Communication Services
GSEW
SPTM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GSEW vs. SPTM — Risk / Return Rank
GSEW
SPTM
GSEW vs. SPTM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (GSEW) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF (SPTM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GSEW | SPTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.41 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.47 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.33 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.28 | 2.65 | -0.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.63 | 11.71 | -3.07 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GSEW vs. SPTM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GSEW drawdown since its inception was -38.65%, smaller than the maximum SPTM drawdown of -54.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSEW and SPTM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GSEW | SPTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.65% | -54.80% | +16.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.72% | -8.68% | +0.96% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.18% | -18.87% | +0.69% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.74% | -24.14% | -1.60% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.66% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.06% | -0.18% | -0.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.82% | -9.02% | +3.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.03% | 1.96% | +0.07% |
Volatility
GSEW vs. SPTM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (GSEW) is 2.57%, while SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF (SPTM) has a volatility of 3.59%. This indicates that GSEW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPTM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GSEW | SPTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.57% | 3.59% | -1.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.24% | 9.89% | -0.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.34% | 12.51% | -0.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.95% | 16.97% | -0.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.12% | 18.02% | +1.10% |
GSEW vs. SPTM - Expense Ratio Comparison
GSEW has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is higher than SPTM's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
GSEW vs. SPTM - Dividend Comparison
GSEW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.38%, more than SPTM's 1.05% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSEW Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF | 1.38% | 1.52% | 1.46% | 1.64% | 1.74% | 1.34% | 1.53% | 1.66% | 1.56% | 0.54% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPTM SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF | 1.05% | 1.13% | 1.28% | 1.44% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.56% | 1.72% | 1.90% | 1.66% | 1.91% | 1.92% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GSEW and SPTM have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPTM has higher volatility (3.59%) compared to GSEW (2.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSEW dropped -38.65% vs SPTM's -54.80%.
On 5-year performance, SPTM leads with 13.07% vs 8.95% for GSEW. On fees, SPTM is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, GSEW has been the lower-risk option at 2.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SPTM has performed better with a 13.07% return vs 8.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPTM is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for GSEW.
GSEW has the higher dividend yield at 1.38%, compared with 1.05% for SPTM.
GSEW tracks Solactive US Large Cap Equal Weight Index, while SPTM tracks S&P Composite 1500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for GSEW and 0.03% for SPTM.
SPTM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GSEW and SPTM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer