PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GSEW vs. IUSG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GSEW vs. IUSG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (GSEW) and iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF (IUSG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GSEW achieves a 10.61% return, which is significantly lower than IUSG's 14.00% return.


GSEW

1D
0.99%
1M
3.38%
YTD
10.61%
6M
10.52%
1Y
19.76%
3Y*
17.95%
5Y*
8.84%
10Y*

IUSG

1D
-0.07%
1M
6.40%
YTD
14.00%
6M
13.31%
1Y
33.47%
3Y*
27.62%
5Y*
15.67%
10Y*
17.82%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GSEW vs. IUSG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GSEW
Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF
10.61%11.97%16.89%17.80%-17.54%25.43%16.28%31.04%-8.11%7.67%
IUSG
iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF
14.00%21.23%34.70%29.28%-28.81%31.26%32.65%30.62%-0.79%7.44%

Correlation

The correlation between GSEW and IUSG is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.70

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2017

0.82

The correlation between GSEW and IUSG shifts across timeframes, from 0.64 (1 year) to 0.82 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

GSEW vs. IUSG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GSEW
IUSG

Technology

20.9%
48.0%

Industrials

15.6%
7.5%

Financial Services

14.3%
8.8%

Healthcare

11.3%
6.2%

Consumer Cyclical

9.1%
9.3%

Utilities

5.8%
0.5%

Consumer Defensive

5.7%
1.0%

Energy

4.9%
0.2%

Basic Materials

4.6%
0.5%

Real Estate

4.0%
0.9%

Communication Services

3.5%
17.1%

Technology

GSEW
20.9%
IUSG
48.0%

Industrials

GSEW
15.6%
IUSG
7.5%

Financial Services

GSEW
14.3%
IUSG
8.8%

Healthcare

GSEW
11.3%
IUSG
6.2%

Consumer Cyclical

GSEW
9.1%
IUSG
9.3%

Utilities

GSEW
5.8%
IUSG
0.5%

Consumer Defensive

GSEW
5.7%
IUSG
1.0%

Energy

GSEW
4.9%
IUSG
0.2%

Basic Materials

GSEW
4.6%
IUSG
0.5%

Real Estate

GSEW
4.0%
IUSG
0.9%

Communication Services

GSEW
3.5%
IUSG
17.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GSEW vs. IUSG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GSEW
GSEW Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
GSEW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSEW Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSEW Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
GSEW Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSEW Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

IUSG
IUSG Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
IUSG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IUSG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
IUSG Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
IUSG Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
IUSG Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GSEW vs. IUSG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (GSEW) and iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF (IUSG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GSEWIUSGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.56

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.37

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.57

2.57

0.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.83

10.95

-1.12

GSEW vs. IUSG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GSEW Sharpe Ratio is 1.64, which is comparable to the IUSG Sharpe Ratio of 2.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSEW and IUSG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GSEWIUSGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.64

2.14

-0.50

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

0.75

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.62

0.38

+0.24

Drawdowns

GSEW vs. IUSG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSEW drawdown since its inception was -38.65%, smaller than the maximum IUSG drawdown of -63.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSEW and IUSG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GSEWIUSGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.65%

-63.41%

+24.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.72%

-13.07%

+5.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.18%

-22.28%

+4.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.74%

-32.21%

+6.47%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.05%

+1.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.89%

-21.44%

+15.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.02%

3.06%

-1.04%

Volatility

GSEW vs. IUSG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (GSEW) is 2.82%, while iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF (IUSG) has a volatility of 4.22%. This indicates that GSEW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IUSG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GSEWIUSGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.82%

4.22%

-1.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.09%

12.23%

-3.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.13%

15.71%

-3.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.92%

20.86%

-3.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.19%

20.40%

-1.21%

GSEW vs. IUSG - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSEW has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is higher than IUSG's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

GSEW vs. IUSG - Dividend Comparison

GSEW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.41%, more than IUSG's 0.47% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GSEW
Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF
1.41%1.52%1.46%1.64%1.74%1.34%1.53%1.66%1.56%0.54%0.00%0.00%
IUSG
iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF
0.47%0.53%0.59%1.12%1.07%0.59%0.93%1.64%1.32%1.28%1.48%1.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


GSEW and IUSG have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IUSG has higher volatility (4.22%) compared to GSEW (2.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSEW dropped -38.65% vs IUSG's -63.41%.

On 5-year performance, IUSG leads with 15.67% vs 8.84% for GSEW. On fees, IUSG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, GSEW has been the lower-risk option at 2.82%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, IUSG has performed better with a 15.67% return vs 8.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IUSG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for GSEW.

GSEW has the higher dividend yield at 1.41%, compared with 0.47% for IUSG.

GSEW tracks Solactive US Large Cap Equal Weight Index, while IUSG tracks Russell 3000 Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for GSEW and 0.04% for IUSG.

IUSG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.14 vs 1.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GSEW and IUSG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer