PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IUSG vs. IUSV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IUSG vs. IUSV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF (IUSG) and iShares Core S&P U.S. Value ETF (IUSV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IUSG achieves a 9.76% return, which is significantly higher than IUSV's 7.35% return. Over the past 10 years, IUSG has outperformed IUSV with an annualized return of 17.37%, while IUSV has yielded a comparatively lower 11.89% annualized return.


IUSG

1D
-3.72%
1M
0.19%
YTD
9.76%
6M
8.82%
1Y
29.45%
3Y*
25.99%
5Y*
14.80%
10Y*
17.37%

IUSV

1D
-1.15%
1M
0.63%
YTD
7.35%
6M
7.84%
1Y
21.53%
3Y*
15.41%
5Y*
10.42%
10Y*
11.89%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IUSG vs. IUSV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IUSG
iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF
9.76%21.23%34.70%29.28%-28.81%31.26%32.65%30.62%-0.79%27.02%
IUSV
iShares Core S&P U.S. Value ETF
7.35%12.85%12.18%21.73%-5.40%25.22%1.56%31.47%-9.21%15.09%

Correlation

The correlation between IUSG and IUSV is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.58

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 7, 2000

0.79

Over the past year, the correlation between IUSG and IUSV has dropped to 0.54 - well below their long-term average of 0.79, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

IUSG vs. IUSV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IUSG
IUSV

Technology

48.0%
20.8%

Communication Services

17.1%
3.1%

Consumer Cyclical

9.3%
11.1%

Financial Services

8.8%
15.0%

Industrials

7.5%
11.2%

Healthcare

6.2%
11.0%

Consumer Defensive

1.0%
8.8%

Real Estate

0.9%
3.7%

Basic Materials

0.5%
3.6%

Utilities

0.5%
4.3%

Energy

0.2%
7.2%

Technology

IUSG
48.0%
IUSV
20.8%

Communication Services

IUSG
17.1%
IUSV
3.1%

Consumer Cyclical

IUSG
9.3%
IUSV
11.1%

Financial Services

IUSG
8.8%
IUSV
15.0%

Industrials

IUSG
7.5%
IUSV
11.2%

Healthcare

IUSG
6.2%
IUSV
11.0%

Consumer Defensive

IUSG
1.0%
IUSV
8.8%

Real Estate

IUSG
0.9%
IUSV
3.7%

Basic Materials

IUSG
0.5%
IUSV
3.6%

Utilities

IUSG
0.5%
IUSV
4.3%

Energy

IUSG
0.2%
IUSV
7.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IUSG vs. IUSV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IUSG
IUSG Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
IUSG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IUSG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
IUSG Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
IUSG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
IUSG Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

IUSV
IUSV Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
IUSV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IUSV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
IUSV Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
IUSV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
IUSV Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IUSG vs. IUSV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF (IUSG) and iShares Core S&P U.S. Value ETF (IUSV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IUSGIUSVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.55

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.38

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.26

3.40

-1.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.59

13.00

-3.41

IUSG vs. IUSV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IUSG Sharpe Ratio is 1.83, which is comparable to the IUSV Sharpe Ratio of 2.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IUSG and IUSV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IUSGIUSVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.83

2.15

-0.32

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

0.72

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

0.70

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.38

0.60

-0.23

Drawdowns

IUSG vs. IUSV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IUSG drawdown since its inception was -63.41%, which is greater than IUSV's maximum drawdown of -56.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IUSG and IUSV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IUSGIUSVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.41%

-56.88%

-6.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.07%

-6.36%

-6.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.28%

-17.76%

-4.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.21%

-17.95%

-14.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.35%

-37.54%

+5.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.73%

-1.15%

-3.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.43%

-6.29%

-15.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.08%

1.66%

+1.42%

Volatility

IUSG vs. IUSV - Volatility Comparison

iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF (IUSG) has a higher volatility of 5.45% compared to iShares Core S&P U.S. Value ETF (IUSV) at 2.45%. This indicates that IUSG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IUSV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IUSGIUSVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.45%

2.45%

+3.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.84%

7.28%

+5.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.18%

10.07%

+6.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.92%

14.56%

+6.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.44%

17.07%

+3.37%

IUSG vs. IUSV - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both IUSG and IUSV have an expense ratio of 0.04%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IUSG vs. IUSV - Dividend Comparison

IUSG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.49%, less than IUSV's 1.68% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IUSG
iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF
0.49%0.53%0.59%1.12%1.07%0.59%0.93%1.64%1.32%1.28%1.48%1.29%
IUSV
iShares Core S&P U.S. Value ETF
1.68%1.78%2.15%1.75%2.22%1.87%2.40%2.19%2.67%1.93%4.44%7.63%

Frequently Asked Questions


IUSG and IUSV have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IUSG has higher volatility (5.45%) compared to IUSV (2.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IUSG dropped -63.41% vs IUSV's -56.88%.

On 10-year performance, IUSG leads with 17.37% vs 11.89% for IUSV. Both ETFs have the same 0.04% expense ratio. On volatility, IUSV has been the lower-risk option at 2.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IUSG has performed better with a 17.37% return vs 11.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IUSG and IUSV have the same expense ratio: 0.04% per year.

IUSV has the higher dividend yield at 1.68%, compared with 0.49% for IUSG.

IUSG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while IUSV is Large Cap Value Equities. IUSG tracks Russell 3000 Growth Index, while IUSV tracks S&P 900 Value Index.

IUSV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 1.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IUSG and IUSV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer