PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IUSG vs. VUG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IUSG vs. VUG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF (IUSG) and Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IUSG achieves a 15.36% return, which is significantly higher than VUG's 9.81% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IUSG having a 17.47% annualized return and VUG not far ahead at 17.79%.


IUSG

1D
2.35%
1M
4.31%
6M
15.91%
YTD
15.36%
1Y
24.84%
3Y*
26.32%
5Y*
13.72%
10Y*
17.47%
ALL TIME*
8.28%

VUG

1D
2.31%
1M
4.20%
6M
13.15%
YTD
9.81%
1Y
18.35%
3Y*
24.22%
5Y*
12.88%
10Y*
17.79%
ALL TIME*
12.30%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$105.58M$92.91M$100.13M
$557.36M$649.80M$660.09M

IUSG vs. VUG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IUSG
iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF
15.36%21.23%34.70%29.28%-28.81%31.26%32.65%30.62%-0.79%27.02%
VUG
Vanguard Growth ETF
9.81%19.40%32.69%46.83%-33.16%27.35%40.25%37.03%-3.32%27.72%

Correlation

The correlation between IUSG and VUG is 0.98 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.98

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2004

0.97

The correlation between IUSG and VUG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

IUSG vs. VUG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IUSG
VUG

Technology

50.9%
56.2%

Communication Services

14.9%
15.4%

Financial Services

8.6%
3.8%

Consumer Cyclical

8.5%
11.5%

Industrials

7.7%
5.3%

Healthcare

6.5%
4.7%

Consumer Defensive

1.0%
1.4%

Real Estate

0.8%
1.0%

Basic Materials

0.5%
0.5%

Utilities

0.4%
0.7%

Energy

0.2%
0.3%

Technology

IUSG
50.9%
VUG
56.2%

Communication Services

IUSG
14.9%
VUG
15.4%

Financial Services

IUSG
8.6%
VUG
3.8%

Consumer Cyclical

IUSG
8.5%
VUG
11.5%

Industrials

IUSG
7.7%
VUG
5.3%

Healthcare

IUSG
6.5%
VUG
4.7%

Consumer Defensive

IUSG
1.0%
VUG
1.4%

Real Estate

IUSG
0.8%
VUG
1.0%

Basic Materials

IUSG
0.5%
VUG
0.5%

Utilities

IUSG
0.4%
VUG
0.7%

Energy

IUSG
0.2%
VUG
0.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IUSG vs. VUG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

IUSG
IUSG Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
IUSG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IUSG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
IUSG Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
IUSG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
IUSG Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

VUG
VUG Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
VUG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VUG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
VUG Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
VUG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
VUG Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

IUSG vs. VUG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF (IUSG) and Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IUSGVUGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.19

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.91

1.12

+0.79

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.08

3.54

+3.54

IUSG vs. VUG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IUSG Sharpe Ratio is 1.40, which is higher than the VUG Sharpe Ratio of 1.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IUSG and VUG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IUSG vs. VUG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IUSG drawdown since its inception was -63.41%, which is greater than VUG's maximum drawdown of -50.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IUSG and VUG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IUSGVUGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.41%

-50.68%

-12.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.07%

-16.53%

+3.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.28%

-22.85%

+0.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.21%

-35.61%

+3.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.35%

-35.61%

+3.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.22%

+1.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.32%

-7.08%

-14.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.52%

5.20%

-1.68%

Volatility

IUSG vs. VUG - Volatility Comparison

iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF (IUSG) and Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG) have volatilities of 6.53% and 6.22%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IUSGVUGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.53%

6.22%

+0.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.85%

14.55%

+0.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.94%

17.86%

+0.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.24%

22.55%

-1.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.57%

21.58%

-1.01%

IUSG vs. VUG - Expense Ratio Comparison

IUSG has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is higher than VUG's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IUSG vs. VUG - Dividend Comparison

IUSG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.48%, more than VUG's 0.38% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IUSG
iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF
0.48%0.53%0.59%1.12%1.07%0.59%0.93%1.64%1.32%1.28%1.48%1.29%
VUG
Vanguard Growth ETF
0.38%0.41%0.47%0.58%0.70%0.48%0.66%0.95%1.32%1.14%1.39%1.30%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, IUSG and VUG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

IUSG has higher volatility (6.53%) compared to VUG (6.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IUSG dropped -63.41% vs VUG's -50.68%.

On 10-year performance, VUG leads with 17.79% vs 17.47% for IUSG. On fees, VUG is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VUG has been the lower-risk option at 6.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VUG has performed better with a 17.79% return vs 17.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VUG is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.04% for IUSG.

IUSG has the higher dividend yield at 0.48%, compared with 0.38% for VUG.

IUSG tracks S&P 900 Growth Index, while VUG tracks CRSP US Large Cap Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for IUSG and 0.03% for VUG.

IUSG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.40 vs 1.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IUSG and VUG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer