PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GSEW vs. IQM
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

GSEW vs. IQM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (GSEW) and Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF (IQM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

GSEW vs. IQM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
GSEW
Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF
0.15%11.97%16.89%17.80%-17.54%25.43%25.86%
IQM
Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF
3.20%30.76%31.03%41.06%-33.36%25.18%78.48%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GSEW achieves a 0.15% return, which is significantly lower than IQM's 3.20% return.


GSEW

1D
0.38%
1M
-5.12%
YTD
0.15%
6M
0.69%
1Y
13.18%
3Y*
14.03%
5Y*
7.88%
10Y*

IQM

1D
1.99%
1M
-3.98%
YTD
3.20%
6M
2.05%
1Y
57.05%
3Y*
26.96%
5Y*
15.40%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


GSEW vs. IQM - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSEW has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than IQM's 0.50% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

GSEW vs. IQM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GSEW
GSEW Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
GSEW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSEW Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSEW Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
GSEW Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSEW Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

IQM
IQM Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
IQM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IQM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
IQM Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
IQM Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
IQM Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GSEW vs. IQM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (GSEW) and Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF (IQM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GSEWIQMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.75

1.72

-0.97

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.16

2.33

-1.17

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.33

-0.16

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.06

4.00

-2.94

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.86

12.47

-7.60

GSEW vs. IQM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GSEW Sharpe Ratio is 0.75, which is lower than the IQM Sharpe Ratio of 1.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSEW and IQM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GSEWIQMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

1.72

-0.97

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

0.54

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

0.78

-0.22

Correlation

The correlation between GSEW and IQM is 0.76, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

GSEW vs. IQM - Dividend Comparison

GSEW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.55%, while IQM has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
GSEW
Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF
1.55%1.52%1.46%1.64%1.74%1.34%1.53%1.66%1.56%0.54%
IQM
Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.17%0.01%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

GSEW vs. IQM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSEW drawdown since its inception was -38.65%, smaller than the maximum IQM drawdown of -44.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSEW and IQM.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


GSEWIQMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.65%

-44.91%

+6.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.71%

-14.71%

+2.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.74%

-44.91%

+19.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.14%

-6.86%

+1.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.99%

-12.55%

+6.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.78%

4.72%

-1.94%

Volatility

GSEW vs. IQM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (GSEW) is 4.87%, while Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF (IQM) has a volatility of 12.71%. This indicates that GSEW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IQM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


GSEWIQMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.87%

12.71%

-7.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.59%

23.53%

-13.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.69%

33.40%

-15.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.91%

28.67%

-11.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.32%

30.73%

-11.41%