IQM vs. BOTZ
Compare and contrast key facts about Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF (IQM) and Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ).
IQM and BOTZ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IQM is an actively managed fund by Franklin Templeton. It was launched on Feb 25, 2020. BOTZ is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the Indxx Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic Index. It was launched on Sep 12, 2016.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: IQM or BOTZ.
Key characteristics
IQM | BOTZ | |
---|---|---|
YTD Return | 31.86% | 16.94% |
1Y Return | 47.63% | 35.44% |
3Y Return (Ann) | 6.13% | -4.55% |
Sharpe Ratio | 1.95 | 1.66 |
Sortino Ratio | 2.51 | 2.25 |
Omega Ratio | 1.34 | 1.29 |
Calmar Ratio | 2.26 | 0.94 |
Martin Ratio | 8.38 | 6.75 |
Ulcer Index | 5.72% | 5.28% |
Daily Std Dev | 24.66% | 21.50% |
Max Drawdown | -44.91% | -55.54% |
Current Drawdown | -0.86% | -15.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between IQM and BOTZ is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
IQM vs. BOTZ - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, IQM achieves a 31.86% return, which is significantly higher than BOTZ's 16.94% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IQM vs. BOTZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
IQM has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than BOTZ's 0.68% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
IQM vs. BOTZ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF (IQM) and Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
IQM vs. BOTZ - Dividend Comparison
IQM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BOTZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%.
TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.17% | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF | 0.14% | 0.20% | 0.23% | 0.16% | 0.19% | 0.83% | 1.44% | 0.01% | 0.06% |
Drawdowns
IQM vs. BOTZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IQM drawdown since its inception was -44.91%, smaller than the maximum BOTZ drawdown of -55.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IQM and BOTZ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
IQM vs. BOTZ - Volatility Comparison
Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF (IQM) has a higher volatility of 7.28% compared to Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ) at 5.90%. This indicates that IQM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BOTZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.