PortfoliosLab logo
IQM vs. ^GSPC
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between IQM and ^GSPC is 0.85, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.8

Performance

IQM vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF (IQM) and S&P 500 (^GSPC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

60.00%80.00%100.00%120.00%140.00%160.00%180.00%200.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
147.93%
85.49%
IQM
^GSPC

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

IQM:

0.30

^GSPC:

0.46

Sortino Ratio

IQM:

0.65

^GSPC:

0.77

Omega Ratio

IQM:

1.09

^GSPC:

1.11

Calmar Ratio

IQM:

0.34

^GSPC:

0.47

Martin Ratio

IQM:

1.02

^GSPC:

1.94

Ulcer Index

IQM:

10.13%

^GSPC:

4.61%

Daily Std Dev

IQM:

34.75%

^GSPC:

19.44%

Max Drawdown

IQM:

-44.91%

^GSPC:

-56.78%

Current Drawdown

IQM:

-16.85%

^GSPC:

-10.07%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IQM achieves a -9.91% return, which is significantly lower than ^GSPC's -6.06% return.


IQM

YTD

-9.91%

1M

5.34%

6M

-5.87%

1Y

6.61%

5Y*

20.48%

10Y*

N/A

^GSPC

YTD

-6.06%

1M

-1.00%

6M

-4.87%

1Y

8.34%

5Y*

14.11%

10Y*

10.27%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

IQM vs. ^GSPC — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IQM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of IQM is 4747
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of IQM is 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of IQM is 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of IQM is 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of IQM is 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of IQM is 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

^GSPC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ^GSPC is 6969
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

IQM vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF (IQM) and S&P 500 (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The chart of Sharpe ratio for IQM, currently valued at 0.30, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.00
IQM: 0.30
^GSPC: 0.46
The chart of Sortino ratio for IQM, currently valued at 0.65, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.00
IQM: 0.65
^GSPC: 0.77
The chart of Omega ratio for IQM, currently valued at 1.09, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.00
IQM: 1.09
^GSPC: 1.11
The chart of Calmar ratio for IQM, currently valued at 0.34, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.00
IQM: 0.34
^GSPC: 0.47
The chart of Martin ratio for IQM, currently valued at 1.02, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.00
IQM: 1.02
^GSPC: 1.94

The current IQM Sharpe Ratio is 0.30, which is lower than the ^GSPC Sharpe Ratio of 0.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IQM and ^GSPC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.00NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
0.30
0.46
IQM
^GSPC

Drawdowns

IQM vs. ^GSPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IQM drawdown since its inception was -44.91%, smaller than the maximum ^GSPC drawdown of -56.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IQM and ^GSPC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-35.00%-30.00%-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-16.85%
-10.07%
IQM
^GSPC

Volatility

IQM vs. ^GSPC - Volatility Comparison

Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF (IQM) has a higher volatility of 20.69% compared to S&P 500 (^GSPC) at 14.23%. This indicates that IQM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ^GSPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
20.69%
14.23%
IQM
^GSPC