PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GSEW vs. GPIQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GSEW vs. GPIQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (GSEW) and Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF (GPIQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GSEW achieves a 15.21% return, which is significantly lower than GPIQ's 16.20% return.


GSEW

1D
1.65%
1M
2.30%
6M
12.31%
YTD
15.21%
1Y
19.63%
3Y*
17.29%
5Y*
8.94%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
12.15%

GPIQ

1D
2.67%
1M
1.10%
6M
15.14%
YTD
16.20%
1Y
27.26%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
27.82%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$93.95M$83.10M$83.77M
$8.92M$6.80M$6.46M

GSEW vs. GPIQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
GSEW
Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF
15.21%11.97%16.89%17.84%
GPIQ
Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF
16.20%19.77%23.22%15.17%

Correlation

The correlation between GSEW and GPIQ is 0.61, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.61

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 26, 2023

0.66

The correlation between GSEW and GPIQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.

GSEW vs. GPIQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GSEW
GPIQ

Technology

18.3%
60.7%

Industrials

16.4%
4.2%

Financial Services

15.1%
0.2%

Healthcare

12.0%
3.7%

Consumer Cyclical

9.9%
10.1%

Utilities

5.9%
1.4%

Consumer Defensive

5.7%
6.4%

Real Estate

4.3%
0.1%

Basic Materials

4.3%
1.1%

Energy

4.2%
0.5%

Communication Services

3.9%
11.8%

Technology

GSEW
18.3%
GPIQ
60.7%

Industrials

GSEW
16.4%
GPIQ
4.2%

Financial Services

GSEW
15.1%
GPIQ
0.2%

Healthcare

GSEW
12.0%
GPIQ
3.7%

Consumer Cyclical

GSEW
9.9%
GPIQ
10.1%

Utilities

GSEW
5.9%
GPIQ
1.4%

Consumer Defensive

GSEW
5.7%
GPIQ
6.4%

Real Estate

GSEW
4.3%
GPIQ
0.1%

Basic Materials

GSEW
4.3%
GPIQ
1.1%

Energy

GSEW
4.2%
GPIQ
0.5%

Communication Services

GSEW
3.9%
GPIQ
11.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GSEW vs. GPIQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GSEW
GSEW Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
GSEW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSEW Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSEW Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
GSEW Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSEW Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

GPIQ
GPIQ Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
GPIQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GPIQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
GPIQ Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
GPIQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
GPIQ Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GSEW vs. GPIQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (GSEW) and Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF (GPIQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GSEWGPIQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.29

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.55

2.88

-0.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.88

10.14

-0.27

GSEW vs. GPIQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GSEW Sharpe Ratio is 1.60, which is comparable to the GPIQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSEW and GPIQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GSEW vs. GPIQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSEW drawdown since its inception was -38.65%, which is greater than GPIQ's maximum drawdown of -21.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSEW and GPIQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GSEWGPIQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.65%

-21.06%

-17.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.72%

-9.51%

+1.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-2.07%

+2.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.79%

-2.34%

-3.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.99%

2.69%

-0.70%

Volatility

GSEW vs. GPIQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (GSEW) is 3.13%, while Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF (GPIQ) has a volatility of 6.84%. This indicates that GSEW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GPIQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GSEWGPIQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.13%

6.84%

-3.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.34%

14.33%

-4.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.36%

16.84%

-4.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.94%

18.12%

-1.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.08%

18.12%

+0.96%

GSEW vs. GPIQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSEW has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than GPIQ's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

GSEW vs. GPIQ - Dividend Comparison

GSEW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.34%, less than GPIQ's 9.88% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
GPIQ
Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF
9.88%9.81%9.18%1.74%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GSEW
Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF
1.34%1.52%1.46%1.64%1.74%1.34%1.53%1.66%1.56%0.54%

Frequently Asked Questions


GSEW and GPIQ have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GPIQ has higher volatility (6.84%) compared to GSEW (3.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSEW dropped -38.65% vs GPIQ's -21.06%.

On 1-year performance, GPIQ leads with 27.26% vs 19.63% for GSEW. On fees, GSEW is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, GSEW has been the lower-risk option at 3.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, GPIQ has performed better with a 27.26% return vs 19.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GSEW is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for GPIQ.

GPIQ has the higher dividend yield at 9.88%, compared with 1.34% for GSEW.

GSEW is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while GPIQ is Nasdaq-100. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for GSEW and 0.29% for GPIQ.

GPIQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.63 vs 1.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GSEW and GPIQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer