GPIQ vs. QQQI

Last updated Jun 12, 2026

GPIQ (Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF) and QQQI (NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF) are both Nasdaq-100 funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, GPIQ returned 32.48% vs 25.21% for QQQI. With a 0.98 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. GPIQ charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for QQQI.

Performance

GPIQ vs. QQQI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF (GPIQ) and NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GPIQ achieves a 14.91% return, which is significantly higher than QQQI's 9.81% return.

GPIQ

• 1D: 3.02%
• 1M: 1.39%
• YTD: 14.91%
• 6M: 13.80%
• 1Y: 32.48%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QQQI

• 1D: 2.90%
• 1M: 0.16%
• YTD: 9.81%
• 6M: 8.76%
• 1Y: 25.21%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GPIQ vs. QQQI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
GPIQ Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF	14.91%	19.77%	18.78%
QQQI NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF	9.81%	18.62%	19.44%

Correlation

The correlation between GPIQ and QQQI is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.99
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2024	0.98

The correlation between GPIQ and QQQI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

GPIQ vs. QQQI - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	GPIQ	QQQI
Technology	53.8%	53.3%
Communication Services	15.8%	15.7%
Consumer Cyclical	12.3%	12.1%
Consumer Defensive	7.7%	7.7%
Healthcare	4.2%	4.3%
Industrials	2.9%	3.3%
Utilities	1.4%	1.5%
Basic Materials	1.1%	1.2%
Energy	0.6%	0.7%
Financial Services	0.2%	0.3%
Real Estate	0.1%	0.1%

Return for Risk

GPIQ vs. QQQI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GPIQ

GPIQ Risk / Return Rank: 82
GPIQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
GPIQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
GPIQ Omega Ratio Rank: 83
GPIQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
GPIQ Martin Ratio Rank: 85

QQQI

QQQI Risk / Return Rank: 67
QQQI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
QQQI Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
QQQI Omega Ratio Rank: 69
QQQI Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
QQQI Martin Ratio Rank: 74

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GPIQ vs. QQQI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF (GPIQ) and NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GPIQ	QQQI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.25	1.80	+0.45
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.95	2.38	+0.57
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	1.34	+0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.43	2.64	+0.79
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.59	11.36	+3.23

GPIQ vs. QQQI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GPIQ Sharpe Ratio is 2.25, which is comparable to the QQQI Sharpe Ratio of 1.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GPIQ and QQQI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GPIQ vs. QQQI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GPIQ drawdown since its inception was -21.06%, which is greater than QQQI's maximum drawdown of -20.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GPIQ and QQQI.

Drawdown Indicators

	GPIQ	QQQI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.06%	-20.00%	-1.06%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.51%	-9.61%	+0.10%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.04%	-3.36%	+0.32%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.28%	-2.21%	-0.07%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.23%	2.22%	+0.01%

Volatility

GPIQ vs. QQQI - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF (GPIQ) has a higher volatility of 6.43% compared to NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI) at 6.09%. This indicates that GPIQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GPIQ	QQQI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.43%	6.09%	+0.34%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.91%	11.33%	+0.58%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.52%	14.09%	+0.43%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.73%	17.35%	+0.38%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.73%	17.35%	+0.38%

GPIQ vs. QQQI - Expense Ratio Comparison

GPIQ has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than QQQI's 0.68% expense ratio.

Dividends

GPIQ vs. QQQI - Dividend Comparison

GPIQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.60%, less than QQQI's 13.63% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
GPIQ Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF	9.60%	9.81%	9.18%	1.74%
QQQI NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF	13.63%	13.82%	12.85%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GPIQ and QQQI in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.99, GPIQ and QQQI move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, GPIQ or QQQI?

GPIQ has higher volatility (6.43%) compared to QQQI (6.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GPIQ dropped -21.06% vs QQQI's -20.00%.

Which ETF is better, GPIQ or QQQI?

On 1-year performance, GPIQ leads with 32.48% vs 25.21% for QQQI. On fees, GPIQ is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, QQQI has been the lower-risk option at 6.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, GPIQ or QQQI?

Over the 1-year period, GPIQ has performed better with a 32.48% return vs 25.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, GPIQ or QQQI?

GPIQ is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for QQQI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GPIQ or QQQI?

QQQI has the higher dividend yield at 13.63%, compared with 9.60% for GPIQ.

What is the main difference between GPIQ and QQQI?

They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and Neos. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for GPIQ and 0.68% for QQQI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GPIQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.25 vs 1.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.