GPIQ vs. SCHD

Last updated Jun 20, 2026

GPIQ (Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF) and SCHD (Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GPIQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by Goldman Sachs, while SCHD is a Dividend fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. GPIQ is actively managed, while SCHD is passively managed. Over the past year, GPIQ returned 36.95% vs 24.22% for SCHD. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GPIQ charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for SCHD.

Performance

GPIQ vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF (GPIQ) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GPIQ achieves a 18.40% return, which is significantly higher than SCHD's 17.13% return.

GPIQ

• 1D: 2.03%
• 1M: 3.69%
• YTD: 18.40%
• 6M: 18.25%
• 1Y: 36.95%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SCHD

• 1D: -0.22%
• 1M: -0.81%
• YTD: 17.13%
• 6M: 17.00%
• 1Y: 24.22%
• 3Y*: 13.38%
• 5Y*: 9.07%
• 10Y*: 12.48%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GPIQ vs. SCHD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
GPIQ Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF	18.40%	19.77%	23.22%	15.17%
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF	17.13%	4.34%	11.66%	12.21%

Correlation

The correlation between GPIQ and SCHD is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.18
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 26, 2023	0.31

The correlation between GPIQ and SCHD shifts across timeframes, from 0.18 (1 year) to 0.31 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

GPIQ vs. SCHD - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	GPIQ	SCHD
Technology	58.7%	19.4%
Communication Services	14.1%	6.0%
Consumer Cyclical	11.6%	6.7%
Consumer Defensive	6.4%	18.5%
Healthcare	3.6%	18.4%
Industrials	2.6%	7.4%
Utilities	1.3%	0.0%
Basic Materials	1.0%	1.2%
Energy	0.5%	14.6%
Financial Services	0.2%	9.1%
Real Estate	0.1%	-

Return for Risk

GPIQ vs. SCHD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GPIQ

GPIQ Risk / Return Rank: 81
GPIQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
GPIQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
GPIQ Omega Ratio Rank: 81
GPIQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
GPIQ Martin Ratio Rank: 84

SCHD

SCHD Risk / Return Rank: 77
SCHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
SCHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
SCHD Omega Ratio Rank: 70
SCHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
SCHD Martin Ratio Rank: 72

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GPIQ vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF (GPIQ) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GPIQ	SCHD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.50	2.20	+0.30
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.27	3.36	-0.08
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.45	1.39	+0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.90	5.27	-1.37
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	16.54	12.86	+3.68

GPIQ vs. SCHD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GPIQ Sharpe Ratio is 2.50, which is comparable to the SCHD Sharpe Ratio of 2.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GPIQ and SCHD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GPIQ vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GPIQ drawdown since its inception was -21.06%, smaller than the maximum SCHD drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GPIQ and SCHD.

Drawdown Indicators

	GPIQ	SCHD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.06%	-33.37%	+12.31%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.51%	-4.61%	-4.90%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-16.13%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-16.85%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-33.37%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.22%	-2.95%	+2.73%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.27%	-3.31%	+1.04%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.24%	1.89%	+0.35%

Volatility

GPIQ vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF (GPIQ) has a higher volatility of 7.18% compared to Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) at 3.58%. This indicates that GPIQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GPIQ	SCHD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.18%	3.58%	+3.60%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.32%	7.75%	+4.57%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.86%	11.07%	+3.79%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.80%	14.38%	+3.42%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.80%	16.73%	+1.07%

GPIQ vs. SCHD - Expense Ratio Comparison

GPIQ has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHD's 0.06% expense ratio.

Dividends

GPIQ vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison

GPIQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.32%, more than SCHD's 3.31% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GPIQ Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF	9.32%	9.81%	9.18%	1.74%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF	3.31%	3.82%	3.64%	3.49%	3.39%	2.78%	3.16%	2.98%	3.06%	2.63%	2.89%	2.97%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GPIQ and SCHD in my portfolio?

GPIQ and SCHD have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GPIQ or SCHD?

GPIQ has higher volatility (7.18%) compared to SCHD (3.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GPIQ dropped -21.06% vs SCHD's -33.37%.

Which ETF is better, GPIQ or SCHD?

On 1-year performance, GPIQ leads with 36.95% vs 24.22% for SCHD. On fees, SCHD is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, SCHD has been the lower-risk option at 3.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, GPIQ or SCHD?

Over the 1-year period, GPIQ has performed better with a 36.95% return vs 24.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, GPIQ or SCHD?

SCHD is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for GPIQ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GPIQ or SCHD?

GPIQ has the higher dividend yield at 9.32%, compared with 3.31% for SCHD.

What is the main difference between GPIQ and SCHD?

GPIQ is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while SCHD is Dividend. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for GPIQ and 0.06% for SCHD.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GPIQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.50 vs 2.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.