PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GSEE vs. GSEW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GSEE vs. GSEW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF (GSEE) and Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (GSEW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GSEE achieves a 27.44% return, which is significantly higher than GSEW's 9.52% return.


GSEE

1D
-1.36%
1M
8.70%
YTD
27.44%
6M
30.18%
1Y
54.30%
3Y*
23.60%
5Y*
7.49%
10Y*

GSEW

1D
-0.66%
1M
3.19%
YTD
9.52%
6M
9.82%
1Y
18.80%
3Y*
17.43%
5Y*
8.63%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GSEE vs. GSEW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
GSEE
Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF
27.44%33.38%4.94%11.03%-19.57%-2.61%43.54%
GSEW
Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF
9.52%11.97%16.89%17.80%-17.54%25.43%39.18%

Correlation

The correlation between GSEE and GSEW is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.59

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 18, 2020

0.62

The correlation between GSEE and GSEW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.

GSEE vs. GSEW - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GSEE
GSEW

Technology

36.0%
20.9%

Financial Services

18.8%
14.3%

Consumer Cyclical

9.7%
9.1%

Industrials

9.0%
15.6%

Communication Services

6.6%
3.5%

Basic Materials

6.3%
4.6%

Energy

4.0%
4.9%

Healthcare

3.1%
11.3%

Consumer Defensive

3.0%
5.7%

Utilities

2.3%
5.8%

Real Estate

1.2%
4.0%

Technology

GSEE
36.0%
GSEW
20.9%

Financial Services

GSEE
18.8%
GSEW
14.3%

Consumer Cyclical

GSEE
9.7%
GSEW
9.1%

Industrials

GSEE
9.0%
GSEW
15.6%

Communication Services

GSEE
6.6%
GSEW
3.5%

Basic Materials

GSEE
6.3%
GSEW
4.6%

Energy

GSEE
4.0%
GSEW
4.9%

Healthcare

GSEE
3.1%
GSEW
11.3%

Consumer Defensive

GSEE
3.0%
GSEW
5.7%

Utilities

GSEE
2.3%
GSEW
5.8%

Real Estate

GSEE
1.2%
GSEW
4.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GSEE vs. GSEW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GSEE
GSEE Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
GSEE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSEE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSEE Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
GSEE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSEE Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

GSEW
GSEW Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
GSEW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSEW Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSEW Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
GSEW Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSEW Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GSEE vs. GSEW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF (GSEE) and Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (GSEW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GSEEGSEWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.27

+0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.18

2.45

+1.73

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.02

9.35

+6.67

GSEE vs. GSEW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GSEE Sharpe Ratio is 2.80, which is higher than the GSEW Sharpe Ratio of 1.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSEE and GSEW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GSEEGSEWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.80

1.56

+1.23

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

0.51

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.77

0.61

+0.16

Drawdowns

GSEE vs. GSEW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSEE drawdown since its inception was -37.51%, roughly equal to the maximum GSEW drawdown of -38.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSEE and GSEW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GSEEGSEWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.51%

-38.65%

+1.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.05%

-7.72%

-5.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.39%

-18.18%

+0.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.97%

-25.74%

-9.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.36%

-0.66%

-0.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.73%

-5.89%

-8.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.40%

2.02%

+1.38%

Volatility

GSEE vs. GSEW - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF (GSEE) has a higher volatility of 8.68% compared to Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (GSEW) at 2.76%. This indicates that GSEE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GSEW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GSEEGSEWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.68%

2.76%

+5.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.80%

9.05%

+7.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.52%

12.12%

+7.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.24%

16.91%

+1.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.39%

19.20%

-0.81%

GSEE vs. GSEW - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSEE has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is higher than GSEW's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

GSEE vs. GSEW - Dividend Comparison

GSEE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.98%, more than GSEW's 1.42% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
GSEE
Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF
1.98%2.53%2.79%3.07%3.05%6.10%2.41%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GSEW
Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF
1.42%1.52%1.46%1.64%1.74%1.34%1.53%1.66%1.56%0.54%

Frequently Asked Questions


GSEE and GSEW have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GSEE has higher volatility (8.68%) compared to GSEW (2.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSEE dropped -37.51% vs GSEW's -38.65%.

On 5-year performance, GSEW leads with 8.63% vs 7.49% for GSEE. On fees, GSEW is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, GSEW has been the lower-risk option at 2.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, GSEW has performed better with a 8.63% return vs 7.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GSEW is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.36% for GSEE.

GSEE has the higher dividend yield at 1.98%, compared with 1.42% for GSEW.

GSEE is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while GSEW is Large Cap Growth Equities. GSEE tracks Solactive GBS Emerging Markets Large & Mid Cap Index, while GSEW tracks Solactive US Large Cap Equal Weight Index. Their fees differ too: 0.36% for GSEE and 0.09% for GSEW.

GSEE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.80 vs 1.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GSEE and GSEW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer