GSEE vs. SPEM
Compare and contrast key facts about Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF (GSEE) and SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF (SPEM).
GSEE and SPEM are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GSEE is a passively managed fund by Goldman Sachs that tracks the performance of the Solactive GBS Emerging Markets Large & Mid Cap Index. It was launched on May 12, 2020. SPEM is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the S&P Emerging Markets BMI. It was launched on Mar 19, 2007. Both GSEE and SPEM are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: GSEE or SPEM.
Key characteristics
GSEE | SPEM | |
---|---|---|
YTD Return | 7.67% | 9.23% |
1Y Return | 15.62% | 17.48% |
3Y Return (Ann) | -3.09% | -1.10% |
Sharpe Ratio | 1.12 | 1.28 |
Daily Std Dev | 14.02% | 13.60% |
Max Drawdown | -37.51% | -64.41% |
Current Drawdown | -16.77% | -10.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between GSEE and SPEM is 0.98, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
GSEE vs. SPEM - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, GSEE achieves a 7.67% return, which is significantly lower than SPEM's 9.23% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GSEE vs. SPEM - Expense Ratio Comparison
GSEE has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is higher than SPEM's 0.11% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
GSEE vs. SPEM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF (GSEE) and SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF (SPEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
GSEE vs. SPEM - Dividend Comparison
GSEE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.55%, less than SPEM's 2.57% yield.
TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF | 1.55% | 3.07% | 3.05% | 6.10% | 2.41% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF | 2.57% | 2.80% | 3.38% | 3.14% | 1.92% | 2.94% | 2.34% | 1.12% | 1.51% | 2.40% | 2.26% | 1.91% |
Drawdowns
GSEE vs. SPEM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GSEE drawdown since its inception was -37.51%, smaller than the maximum SPEM drawdown of -64.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSEE and SPEM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
GSEE vs. SPEM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF (GSEE) is 3.06%, while SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF (SPEM) has a volatility of 3.38%. This indicates that GSEE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.