GSEE vs. BKEM

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

GSEE (Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF) and BKEM (BNY Mellon Emerging Markets Equity ETF) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds - GSEE tracks the Solactive GBS Emerging Markets Large & Mid Cap Index while BKEM tracks the Morningstar Emerging Markets Large Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GSEE returned 7.00%/yr vs 6.77%/yr for BKEM. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. GSEE charges 0.36%/yr vs 0.11%/yr for BKEM.

Performance

GSEE vs. BKEM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF (GSEE) and BNY Mellon Emerging Markets Equity ETF (BKEM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GSEE achieves a 23.34% return, which is significantly lower than BKEM's 24.97% return.

GSEE

• 1D: -5.32%
• 1M: 2.31%
• YTD: 23.34%
• 6M: 23.87%
• 1Y: 45.47%
• 3Y*: 22.27%
• 5Y*: 7.00%
• 10Y*: —

BKEM

• 1D: -5.37%
• 1M: 2.20%
• YTD: 24.97%
• 6M: 25.93%
• 1Y: 47.05%
• 3Y*: 22.54%
• 5Y*: 6.77%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GSEE vs. BKEM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
GSEE Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF	23.34%	33.38%	4.94%	11.03%	-19.57%	-2.61%	43.54%
BKEM BNY Mellon Emerging Markets Equity ETF	24.97%	30.55%	7.53%	8.68%	-19.43%	-3.91%	43.02%

Correlation

The correlation between GSEE and BKEM is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.94
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.96
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.97
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 15, 2020	0.97

The correlation between GSEE and BKEM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

GSEE vs. BKEM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	GSEE	BKEM
Technology	43.0%	43.0%
Financial Services	17.1%	16.9%
Consumer Cyclical	8.7%	8.7%
Industrials	8.0%	8.1%
Communication Services	5.8%	5.8%
Basic Materials	5.6%	5.7%
Energy	3.4%	3.4%
Healthcare	2.8%	2.7%
Consumer Defensive	2.5%	2.6%
Utilities	2.1%	2.0%
Real Estate	1.1%	1.1%

Return for Risk

GSEE vs. BKEM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GSEE

GSEE Risk / Return Rank: 69
GSEE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
GSEE Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
GSEE Omega Ratio Rank: 70
GSEE Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
GSEE Martin Ratio Rank: 73

BKEM

BKEM Risk / Return Rank: 71
BKEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
BKEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
BKEM Omega Ratio Rank: 72
BKEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
BKEM Martin Ratio Rank: 74

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GSEE vs. BKEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF (GSEE) and BNY Mellon Emerging Markets Equity ETF (BKEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GSEE	BKEM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.06	2.14	-0.08
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.68	2.71	-0.03
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	1.40	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.50	3.61	-0.11
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.71	13.18	-0.47

GSEE vs. BKEM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GSEE Sharpe Ratio is 2.06, which is comparable to the BKEM Sharpe Ratio of 2.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSEE and BKEM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GSEE vs. BKEM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSEE drawdown since its inception was -37.51%, roughly equal to the maximum BKEM drawdown of -39.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSEE and BKEM.

Drawdown Indicators

	GSEE	BKEM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-37.51%	-39.48%	+1.97%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.05%	-13.11%	+0.06%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.39%	-18.38%	+0.99%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-34.89%	-36.20%	+1.31%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.32%	-5.37%	+0.05%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.63%	-15.89%	+1.26%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.59%	3.58%	+0.01%

Volatility

GSEE vs. BKEM - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF (GSEE) and BNY Mellon Emerging Markets Equity ETF (BKEM) have volatilities of 12.17% and 12.30%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GSEE	BKEM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.17%	12.30%	-0.13%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.00%	20.07%	-0.07%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.20%	22.13%	+0.07%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.86%	19.35%	-0.49%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.83%	19.55%	-0.72%

GSEE vs. BKEM - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSEE has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is higher than BKEM's 0.11% expense ratio.

Dividends

GSEE vs. BKEM - Dividend Comparison

GSEE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.05%, more than BKEM's 1.51% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
BKEM BNY Mellon Emerging Markets Equity ETF	1.51%	2.25%	2.76%	3.02%	3.15%	2.22%	1.78%
GSEE Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF	2.05%	2.53%	2.79%	3.07%	3.05%	6.10%	2.41%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GSEE and BKEM in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.94, GSEE and BKEM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, GSEE or BKEM?

BKEM has higher volatility (12.30%) compared to GSEE (12.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSEE dropped -37.51% vs BKEM's -39.48%.

Which ETF is better, GSEE or BKEM?

On 5-year performance, GSEE leads with 7.00% vs 6.77% for BKEM. On fees, BKEM is cheaper at 0.11% per year. On volatility, GSEE has been the lower-risk option at 12.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, GSEE or BKEM?

Over the 5-year period, GSEE has performed better with a 7.00% return vs 6.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, GSEE or BKEM?

BKEM is cheaper with a 0.11% expense ratio, compared with 0.36% for GSEE.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GSEE or BKEM?

GSEE has the higher dividend yield at 2.05%, compared with 1.51% for BKEM.

What is the main difference between GSEE and BKEM?

GSEE tracks Solactive GBS Emerging Markets Large & Mid Cap Index, while BKEM tracks Morningstar Emerging Markets Large Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and BNY Mellon. Their fees differ too: 0.36% for GSEE and 0.11% for BKEM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BKEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.14 vs 2.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.