GSEE vs. BKEM
Compare and contrast key facts about Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF (GSEE) and BNY Mellon Emerging Markets Equity ETF (BKEM).
GSEE and BKEM are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GSEE is a passively managed fund by Goldman Sachs that tracks the performance of the Solactive GBS Emerging Markets Large & Mid Cap Index. It was launched on May 12, 2020. BKEM is a passively managed fund by The Bank of New York Mellon Corp. that tracks the performance of the Morningstar Emerging Markets Large Cap Index. It was launched on Apr 24, 2020. Both GSEE and BKEM are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: GSEE or BKEM.
Correlation
The correlation between GSEE and BKEM is 0.98, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
GSEE vs. BKEM - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
GSEE:
0.70
BKEM:
0.79
GSEE:
1.07
BKEM:
1.19
GSEE:
1.13
BKEM:
1.15
GSEE:
0.38
BKEM:
0.40
GSEE:
2.33
BKEM:
2.67
GSEE:
4.43%
BKEM:
4.45%
GSEE:
14.64%
BKEM:
15.08%
GSEE:
-37.51%
BKEM:
-39.48%
GSEE:
-18.41%
BKEM:
-20.26%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GSEE achieves a 0.58% return, which is significantly higher than BKEM's -0.37% return.
GSEE
0.58%
-2.64%
-2.03%
11.93%
N/A
N/A
BKEM
-0.37%
-2.77%
-1.37%
13.62%
N/A
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GSEE vs. BKEM - Expense Ratio Comparison
GSEE has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is higher than BKEM's 0.11% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
GSEE vs. BKEM — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
GSEE
BKEM
GSEE vs. BKEM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF (GSEE) and BNY Mellon Emerging Markets Equity ETF (BKEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
GSEE vs. BKEM - Dividend Comparison
GSEE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.77%, which matches BKEM's 2.77% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSEE Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF | 2.77% | 2.79% | 3.08% | 3.05% | 6.10% | 2.41% |
BKEM BNY Mellon Emerging Markets Equity ETF | 2.77% | 2.76% | 3.02% | 3.15% | 2.22% | 1.78% |
Drawdowns
GSEE vs. BKEM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GSEE drawdown since its inception was -37.51%, roughly equal to the maximum BKEM drawdown of -39.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSEE and BKEM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
GSEE vs. BKEM - Volatility Comparison
Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF (GSEE) and BNY Mellon Emerging Markets Equity ETF (BKEM) have volatilities of 4.01% and 3.91%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.