PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GSEE vs. IDMO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GSEE vs. IDMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF (GSEE) and Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF (IDMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GSEE achieves a 27.44% return, which is significantly higher than IDMO's 7.74% return.


GSEE

1D
-1.36%
1M
8.70%
YTD
27.44%
6M
30.18%
1Y
54.30%
3Y*
23.60%
5Y*
7.49%
10Y*

IDMO

1D
-1.16%
1M
2.20%
YTD
7.74%
6M
12.22%
1Y
23.09%
3Y*
25.70%
5Y*
15.53%
10Y*
12.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GSEE vs. IDMO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
GSEE
Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF
27.44%33.38%4.94%11.03%-19.57%-2.61%43.54%
IDMO
Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF
7.74%42.17%12.79%20.16%-12.03%14.31%35.33%

Correlation

The correlation between GSEE and IDMO is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.64

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 18, 2020

0.69

The correlation between GSEE and IDMO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.

GSEE vs. IDMO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GSEE
IDMO

Technology

36.0%
5.3%

Financial Services

18.8%
42.4%

Consumer Cyclical

9.7%
1.4%

Industrials

9.0%
22.6%

Communication Services

6.6%
2.2%

Basic Materials

6.3%
10.2%

Energy

4.0%
1.9%

Healthcare

3.1%
1.2%

Consumer Defensive

3.0%
2.5%

Utilities

2.3%
8.4%

Real Estate

1.2%
2.0%

Technology

GSEE
36.0%
IDMO
5.3%

Financial Services

GSEE
18.8%
IDMO
42.4%

Consumer Cyclical

GSEE
9.7%
IDMO
1.4%

Industrials

GSEE
9.0%
IDMO
22.6%

Communication Services

GSEE
6.6%
IDMO
2.2%

Basic Materials

GSEE
6.3%
IDMO
10.2%

Energy

GSEE
4.0%
IDMO
1.9%

Healthcare

GSEE
3.1%
IDMO
1.2%

Consumer Defensive

GSEE
3.0%
IDMO
2.5%

Utilities

GSEE
2.3%
IDMO
8.4%

Real Estate

GSEE
1.2%
IDMO
2.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GSEE vs. IDMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GSEE
GSEE Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
GSEE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSEE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSEE Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
GSEE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSEE Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

IDMO
IDMO Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
IDMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IDMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
IDMO Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
IDMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
IDMO Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GSEE vs. IDMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF (GSEE) and Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF (IDMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GSEEIDMODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.80

1.37

+1.42

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.63

2.03

+1.60

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.25

+0.25

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.18

1.88

+2.30

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

16.02

7.84

+8.18

GSEE vs. IDMO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GSEE Sharpe Ratio is 2.80, which is higher than the IDMO Sharpe Ratio of 1.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSEE and IDMO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GSEEIDMODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.80

1.37

+1.42

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

0.88

-0.46

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.67

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.77

0.45

+0.32

Drawdowns

GSEE vs. IDMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSEE drawdown since its inception was -37.51%, roughly equal to the maximum IDMO drawdown of -39.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSEE and IDMO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GSEEIDMODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.51%

-39.38%

+1.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.05%

-12.31%

-0.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.39%

-12.65%

-4.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.97%

-27.07%

-7.90%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.36%

-2.31%

+0.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.73%

-9.76%

-4.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.40%

2.95%

+0.45%

Volatility

GSEE vs. IDMO - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF (GSEE) has a higher volatility of 8.68% compared to Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF (IDMO) at 6.43%. This indicates that GSEE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IDMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GSEEIDMODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.68%

6.43%

+2.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.80%

14.91%

+1.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.52%

16.89%

+2.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.24%

17.84%

+0.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.39%

18.12%

+0.27%

GSEE vs. IDMO - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSEE has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is higher than IDMO's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

GSEE vs. IDMO - Dividend Comparison

GSEE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.98%, less than IDMO's 3.53% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GSEE
Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF
1.98%2.53%2.79%3.07%3.05%6.10%2.41%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IDMO
Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF
3.53%3.71%2.24%2.89%3.66%1.81%1.63%2.78%3.27%3.08%2.18%2.52%

Frequently Asked Questions


GSEE and IDMO have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GSEE has higher volatility (8.68%) compared to IDMO (6.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSEE dropped -37.51% vs IDMO's -39.38%.

On 5-year performance, IDMO leads with 15.53% vs 7.49% for GSEE. On fees, IDMO is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, IDMO has been the lower-risk option at 6.43%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, IDMO has performed better with a 15.53% return vs 7.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IDMO is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.36% for GSEE.

IDMO has the higher dividend yield at 3.53%, compared with 1.98% for GSEE.

GSEE is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while IDMO is Momentum. GSEE tracks Solactive GBS Emerging Markets Large & Mid Cap Index, while IDMO tracks S&P Momentum Developed ex U.S. & South Korea LargeMidCap Index. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.36% for GSEE and 0.25% for IDMO.

GSEE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.80 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GSEE and IDMO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer