GRN vs. ATMP
Compare and contrast key facts about iPath Series B Carbon ETN (GRN) and Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN (ATMP).
GRN and ATMP are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GRN is a passively managed fund by Barclays Capital that tracks the performance of the Barclays Global Carbon II Index. It was launched on Sep 10, 2019. ATMP is a passively managed fund by Barclays Capital that tracks the performance of the CIBC Atlas Select MLP VWAP. It was launched on Mar 13, 2013. Both GRN and ATMP are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
GRN vs. ATMP - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GRN vs. ATMP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GRN iPath Series B Carbon ETN | -16.12% | 20.33% | -7.34% | -2.99% | -0.07% | 147.21% | 30.47% | -8.41% |
ATMP Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN | 21.01% | 6.99% | 38.74% | 21.58% | 27.47% | 41.34% | -28.67% | -1.63% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GRN achieves a -16.12% return, which is significantly lower than ATMP's 21.01% return.
GRN
- 1D
- 1.04%
- 1M
- 4.57%
- YTD
- -16.12%
- 6M
- -4.84%
- 1Y
- 7.43%
- 3Y*
- -7.04%
- 5Y*
- 11.37%
- 10Y*
- —
ATMP
- 1D
- -1.49%
- 1M
- 2.80%
- YTD
- 21.01%
- 6M
- 22.57%
- 1Y
- 18.18%
- 3Y*
- 29.03%
- 5Y*
- 26.63%
- 10Y*
- 13.49%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GRN vs. ATMP - Expense Ratio Comparison
GRN has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than ATMP's 0.95% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GRN vs. ATMP — Risk / Return Rank
GRN
ATMP
GRN vs. ATMP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iPath Series B Carbon ETN (GRN) and Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN (ATMP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GRN | ATMP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.25 | 0.99 | -0.74 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.55 | 1.33 | -0.79 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.21 | -0.14 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.22 | 1.22 | -1.00 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.71 | 3.18 | -2.48 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GRN | ATMP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.25 | 0.99 | -0.74 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 | 1.21 | -0.93 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.49 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.39 | 0.30 | +0.09 |
Correlation
The correlation between GRN and ATMP is 0.16, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
GRN vs. ATMP - Dividend Comparison
GRN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ATMP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.51%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GRN iPath Series B Carbon ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ATMP Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN | 4.51% | 5.14% | 4.72% | 5.62% | 5.50% | 5.89% | 8.71% | 6.86% | 6.51% | 5.56% | 5.47% | 6.30% |
Drawdowns
GRN vs. ATMP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GRN drawdown since its inception was -47.96%, smaller than the maximum ATMP drawdown of -73.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GRN and ATMP.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GRN | ATMP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.96% | -73.72% | +25.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.39% | -15.11% | -15.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.96% | -22.98% | -24.98% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -70.30% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -26.34% | -2.41% | -23.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.38% | -17.50% | +0.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.46% | 5.80% | +3.66% |
Volatility
GRN vs. ATMP - Volatility Comparison
iPath Series B Carbon ETN (GRN) has a higher volatility of 13.05% compared to Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN (ATMP) at 3.96%. This indicates that GRN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ATMP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GRN | ATMP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.05% | 3.96% | +9.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.68% | 9.43% | +14.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.63% | 18.40% | +11.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 40.22% | 22.06% | +18.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 42.32% | 27.57% | +14.75% |