GRN vs. QQQ
Compare and contrast key facts about iPath Series B Carbon ETN (GRN) and Invesco QQQ (QQQ).
GRN and QQQ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GRN is a passively managed fund by Barclays Capital that tracks the performance of the Barclays Global Carbon II Index. It was launched on Sep 10, 2019. QQQ is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index. It was launched on Mar 10, 1999. Both GRN and QQQ are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: GRN or QQQ.
Correlation
The correlation between GRN and QQQ is 0.13, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
GRN vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
GRN:
-0.26
QQQ:
1.63
GRN:
-0.14
QQQ:
2.18
GRN:
0.99
QQQ:
1.29
GRN:
-0.12
QQQ:
2.14
GRN:
-0.59
QQQ:
7.71
GRN:
16.27%
QQQ:
3.77%
GRN:
37.04%
QQQ:
17.87%
GRN:
-82.36%
QQQ:
-82.98%
GRN:
-75.86%
QQQ:
-2.69%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GRN achieves a -11.91% return, which is significantly lower than QQQ's 28.44% return.
GRN
-11.91%
-2.07%
2.10%
-10.56%
-12.31%
N/A
QQQ
28.44%
3.54%
10.65%
28.86%
20.62%
18.39%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GRN vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
GRN has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQ's 0.20% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
GRN vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iPath Series B Carbon ETN (GRN) and Invesco QQQ (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
GRN vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison
GRN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.59%.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GRN iPath Series B Carbon ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ | 0.59% | 0.62% | 0.80% | 0.43% | 0.55% | 0.74% | 0.91% | 0.84% | 1.06% | 0.99% | 1.41% | 1.02% |
Drawdowns
GRN vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GRN drawdown since its inception was -82.36%, roughly equal to the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GRN and QQQ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
GRN vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison
iPath Series B Carbon ETN (GRN) has a higher volatility of 9.48% compared to Invesco QQQ (QQQ) at 5.35%. This indicates that GRN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.