PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GQGU vs. PBUS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GQGU vs. PBUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GQG US Equity ETF (GQGU) and Invesco PureBeta MSCI USA ETF (PBUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GQGU achieves a 6.80% return, which is significantly lower than PBUS's 10.03% return.


GQGU

1D
0.85%
1M
1.17%
6M
2.86%
YTD
6.80%
1Y
7.17%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
5.35%

PBUS

1D
0.70%
1M
0.20%
6M
8.62%
YTD
10.03%
1Y
21.08%
3Y*
19.43%
5Y*
12.30%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
14.93%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$4.04M$3.49M$3.46M
$18.29M$14.70M$26.21M

GQGU vs. PBUS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
GQGU
GQG US Equity ETF
6.80%-1.12%
PBUS
Invesco PureBeta MSCI USA ETF
10.03%9.83%

Correlation

The correlation between GQGU and PBUS is -0.13, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2025

-0.13

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GQGU vs. PBUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GQGU
GQGU Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
GQGU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GQGU Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
GQGU Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
GQGU Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
GQGU Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

PBUS
PBUS Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
PBUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PBUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
PBUS Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
PBUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
PBUS Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GQGU vs. PBUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GQG US Equity ETF (GQGU) and Invesco PureBeta MSCI USA ETF (PBUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GQGUPBUSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.81

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.26

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.83

2.13

-1.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.92

8.92

-7.00

GQGU vs. PBUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GQGU Sharpe Ratio is 0.66, which is lower than the PBUS Sharpe Ratio of 1.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GQGU and PBUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GQGU vs. PBUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GQGU drawdown since its inception was -8.41%, smaller than the maximum PBUS drawdown of -33.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GQGU and PBUS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GQGUPBUSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.41%

-33.15%

+24.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.41%

-9.02%

+0.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.47%

-1.36%

-3.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.00%

-5.07%

+2.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.64%

2.15%

+1.49%

Volatility

GQGU vs. PBUS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for GQG US Equity ETF (GQGU) is 2.85%, while Invesco PureBeta MSCI USA ETF (PBUS) has a volatility of 3.57%. This indicates that GQGU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PBUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GQGUPBUSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.85%

3.57%

-0.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.51%

10.28%

-1.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.67%

13.07%

-2.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.58%

17.16%

-6.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.58%

19.26%

-8.68%

GQGU vs. PBUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

GQGU has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than PBUS's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

GQGU vs. PBUS - Dividend Comparison

GQGU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.95%, less than PBUS's 1.02% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
GQGU
GQG US Equity ETF
0.95%1.02%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PBUS
Invesco PureBeta MSCI USA ETF
1.02%1.05%1.20%1.36%1.71%0.98%1.35%1.53%2.33%0.50%

Frequently Asked Questions


GQGU and PBUS have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PBUS has higher volatility (3.57%) compared to GQGU (2.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GQGU dropped -8.41% vs PBUS's -33.15%.

On 1-year performance, PBUS leads with 21.08% vs 7.17% for GQGU. On fees, PBUS is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, GQGU has been the lower-risk option at 2.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, PBUS has performed better with a 21.08% return vs 7.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PBUS is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for GQGU.

PBUS has the higher dividend yield at 1.02%, compared with 0.95% for GQGU.

They also come from different issuers: GQG Partners and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for GQGU and 0.04% for PBUS.

PBUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.47 vs 0.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GQGU and PBUS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer