PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GQGU vs. BCHP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GQGU vs. BCHP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GQG US Equity ETF (GQGU) and Principal Focused Blue Chip ETF (BCHP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GQGU achieves a 6.60% return, which is significantly higher than BCHP's -0.40% return.


GQGU

1D
-1.06%
1M
-1.65%
YTD
6.60%
6M
7.16%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BCHP

1D
-2.07%
1M
0.66%
YTD
-0.40%
6M
-0.96%
1Y
5.90%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GQGU vs. BCHP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
GQGU
GQG US Equity ETF
6.60%-1.14%
BCHP
Principal Focused Blue Chip ETF
-0.40%1.57%

Correlation

The correlation between GQGU and BCHP is -0.13, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2025

-0.13

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GQGU vs. BCHP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GQGU

BCHP
BCHP Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
BCHP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BCHP Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
BCHP Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
BCHP Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
BCHP Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GQGU vs. BCHP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GQG US Equity ETF (GQGU) and Principal Focused Blue Chip ETF (BCHP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

GQGU vs. BCHP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GQGUBCHPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.60

0.89

-0.29

Drawdowns

GQGU vs. BCHP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GQGU drawdown since its inception was -6.65%, smaller than the maximum BCHP drawdown of -18.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GQGU and BCHP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GQGUBCHPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.65%

-18.56%

+11.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.66%

-3.24%

-1.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.54%

-2.97%

+0.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.64%

Volatility

GQGU vs. BCHP - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GQGUBCHPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.14%

15.91%

-5.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.14%

16.86%

-6.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.14%

16.86%

-6.72%

GQGU vs. BCHP - Expense Ratio Comparison

GQGU has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than BCHP's 0.58% expense ratio.


Dividends

GQGU vs. BCHP - Dividend Comparison

GQGU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.96%, while BCHP has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023
BCHP
Principal Focused Blue Chip ETF
0.00%0.00%1.02%0.19%
GQGU
GQG US Equity ETF
0.96%1.02%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GQGU and BCHP have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GQGU is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GQGU is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for BCHP.

GQGU has the higher dividend yield at 0.96%, compared with 0.00% for BCHP.

They also come from different issuers: GQG Partners and Principal. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for GQGU and 0.58% for BCHP.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GQGU and BCHP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer